Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:53:26.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weathering of petroglyphs: direct assessment and implications for dating methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gregory A. Pope
Gregory A. Pope*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth & Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair NJ 07043, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Petroglyphs weather at varying rates, compared tothe unengraved host rock into which they are carved. Most petroglyphs are significantly harder or significantly softer than surrounding rock, depending on the nature of weathering. Variability and intensity of weathering probably introduces error into radiocarbon, rock varnis and micreoerosion dating methods.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 286 , December 2000 , pp. 833 - 843
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bednarik, R.G. 1992. A new method to data petroglyphs, Archaeometry 34(2): 279–91.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995a. The age of the Côa Valley petroglyphs in Portugal, Rock Art Research 12(2): 86–103.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995b. The Côa petroglyphs: an obituary to the stylistic dating of Palaeolithic: rock art, Antiquity 69: 877–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1996. Only time will tell: A review of the methodology of direct art dating, Archaeometry 38: 1–13.Google Scholar
Campbell, I.A. 1991. Classification of rock weathering at Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, Alberta, Canada: a study in applied geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16: 701–11.Google Scholar
Colman, S.M. & Dethier, D. (ed.). 1986. Rates of chemical weathering of rocks and minerals. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Conca, J.L. & Rossman, G.R.. 1982. Case hardening of sandstone, Geology 10: 520–23.Google Scholar
Danin, A. 1985. Paleoclimates in Israel: evidence from weathering patterns of stones in and near archaeological sites, Rullctin of the American Schools for Oriental Research 259: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, M. J. & Connu, A.S.;. 1977. Field assessment of rock hardness using the Schmidt test hammer, British Geomorphological Research Group Technical Bulletin Shorter Technical Methods (II), 18: 19–29.Google Scholar
D’Errico, F., Sacchi, D. & Vanhaeren, M.. In press. L’analyse technique de l’art gravé de Fornols-Haut, Implications pour la datation des représentations de style paléolithiques dans des sites de plein air, in Sacci, D. (ed.), Proceedings, ‘L’Art Paléolithique à l’Air Libre. Le Paysage Modifié par l’Image’, Tautavel 7–9 Octobre 1999. Perpignan: Publications de l’Université de Perpignan.Google Scholar
Dorn, R.I. 1997. Constraining the age of the Côa valley (Portugal) engravings with radiocarbon dating, Antiquity 71: 105–15.Google Scholar
Dorn, R.I. 1998. Rock coatings. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dorn, R.I. 2000. Chronometric techniques: Engravings, in Whitley, D.S. (ed.), Handbook for Rock Art Research: 167–89. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Fleisiier, M., Lui, T. Broeckkr, W.S. & Moore, W. 1999. A clue regarding the origin of rock varnish, Geophysical Research Letters 26(1): 103–6.Google Scholar
Granger, D.E., Kirchner, J.W. & Finkel, R.. 1996. Spatially averaged long-term erosion rates measured from in-situ produced cosmogenic nuclides in alluvial sediment, Journal of Geology 104: 249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinsley, D.H. & Doornkamp, J.C . 1973. Afios of quartz sand surface textures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W.E. & Dyer, B.D.. 1985. This planet is alive - weathering and biology, a multifaceted problem, in Drever, J.I. (ed.), The chemistry of weathering: 143–60. Dordrecht: Reidel D..Google Scholar
Laver, M.E. & Wainwright, I.N.M.. 1995. An investigation of the dissolution of a marble petroglyph site by acid precipitation, Studies in Conservation 40: 265–73.Google Scholar
Meierding, T.C. 1993. Inscription legibility method for estimating rock weathering rates, Geomorphology 6: 273–86.Google Scholar
Olliek, C.D. 1984. Weathering. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Phillips, F.M., Flinsch, M. Elmore, D. & Sharma, P.. 1997. Maximum ages of the Côa valley (Portugal) engravings measured with Chlorine-36, Antiquity 71: 100–104.Google Scholar
Paradise, T.L. 1995. Sandstone weathering thresholds in Petra, Jordan, Physical Geography 16: 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, G.A. 1995. Internal weathering of quartz grains, Physical Geography 16:315–38.Google Scholar
Pope, G.A., Dorn, R.I. & Dixon, J.C.. 1995. A new conceptual model for understanding geographical variations in weathering. Armals of the Association of American Geographers 85(1): 38–64.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, A. & Smith, C.. 1997. Recent developments in radiocarbon and stylistic methods of dating rock art, Antiquity 71: 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, J., Kaluarachchi, W.D. Drummond, L. & Edwards, H.G.M.. 1999. The nature of whewellite-rich rock crusts associated with pictographs in southwestern Texas, Studies in Conservation 44: 91–103.Google Scholar
Steinbring, J. & Callaghan, R.. 1985. Comments on the preparation and weathering of petroglyphs at the mud portage site (Dkkr-4), northwestern Ontario, Manitoba Archaeological Quarterly 9(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Sjüberg, R. 1994. Diagnosis of weathering on rock carving surfaces in northern Bohuslän, southwest Sweden, in Robinson, D.A. & Williams, R.B.G. (ed.), Rock weathering and landform evolution: 223–41. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Vogt, B.J. 1999. The confocal laser microscope as a tool to quantitatively measure stone surface roughness. Abstracts, The Association of American Geographers 95th Annual Meeting, 23–27 March 1999, Honolulu, Hawai’i: 615–16. (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
Wang, Y.X. & Hua, P.D.. 1997. The environment, composition, and protection of Dazu rock inscriptions. Environmental Geology 33(4): 295–8.Google Scholar
Walderhaug, O. 1998. Chemical weathering of rock art sites in western Norway: which mechanisms are active and how can they be retarded? Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walderhaug, O. & Walderhaug, E.M.. 1998. Weathering of Norwegian rock art — a critical review, Norwegian Archaeological Review 31(2): 119–39.Google Scholar
Walston, S. & Dolanski, J.. 1976 Two painted and engraved sandstone sites in Australia, Studies in Conservation 21: 1–17.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1995. Recent petroglyphs, Foz Côa, Portugal, Rock Art Research 12(2): 104–8.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1998. Some observations on the radiocarbon and cosmogenic isotope dating of petroglyphs, Foz Côa, Portugal, Antiquity 72: 197–200.Google Scholar
Watchman, A. 1999. A review of the history of dating rock varnishes. Abstracts, 64th Annual Meeting, Society of American Archaeologists, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Welsh, P.H. & Dorn, R.I.. 1997. Critical analysis of petroglyph radiocarbon ages from Côa, Portugal and Deer Valley, Arizona, American Indian Rock Art 23: 11–24.Google Scholar
Young, G.S. & Wainwright, I.N.M.. 1995. The control of algal biodeterioration of a marble petroglyph site, Studies in Conservation 40: 82–92.Google Scholar
Zilhåo, J. 1995. The age of the Côa Valley (Portugal) rock art: validation of archaeological dating to the Paleolithic and refutation of ‘scientific’ dating to historic or protohistoric times, Antiquity 69: 883–901.Google Scholar
Zilhåo, J. 1999. Archaeologically dated Paleolithic rock art at Fariseu, Côa Valley. Eventos & Notícias, Instituto Português de Arquelogia, Lisboa, http://www.ipa.min-cultura.pt/news/noticias/fariseu/Fariseu_ukGoogle Scholar