Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:05:34.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Visual competence’ in archaeology: a problem hiding in plain sight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2015

Simon James*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology & Ancient History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK (Email: [email protected])

Extract

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Peter Connolly FSA (1935–2012), illustrator, author, experimental archaeologist and inspiration.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, L. & Adkins, R.. 2009. Archaeological illustration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. 1986. The Roman saddle. Britannia 17: 353–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/526559 Google Scholar
Connolly, P. 1988. Tiberius Claudius Maximus the cavalryman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, P. & van Driel-Murray, C.. 1991. The Roman cavalry saddle. Britannia 22: 3350. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/526629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cookson, M.B. 1954. Photography for archaeologists. London: Parrish.Google Scholar
Curle, J. 1911. A Roman frontier post and its people. The fort at Newstead. Glasgow: J. Maclehose.Google Scholar
von Freeden, U. & von Schnurbein, S. (ed.). 2002. Spuren der Jahrtausende: Archäologie und Geschichte in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Theiss.Google Scholar
Hattwig, D., Burgess, J., Bussert, K. & Medaille, A.. 2011. ACRL visual literacy competency standards for higher education. Association of College and Research Libraries. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy (accessed 16 April 2015).Google Scholar
Hattwig, D., Bussert, K., Medaille, A. & Burgess, J.. 2013. Visual literacy standards in higher education: new opportunities for libraries and student learning. Libraries and the Academy 13: 6189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B. 1965. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice part II: ends and means. Antiquity 40: 107–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00032270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B. 1966. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice part III: lines of communication. Antiquity 41: 181–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00033214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Taylor, B. 1977. Yeavering: an Anglo-British centre of early Northumbria. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. 1979. The discovery of Dura-Europos. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hug, T. 2012. Media competence and visual literacy—towards considerations beyond literacies. Social and Management Sciences 20: 115–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2012-2.06 Google Scholar
Hunter, F. & Keppie, L. (ed.). 2012. A Roman frontier post and its people: Newstead 1911–2011. Edinburgh: NMSE Publishing.Google Scholar
James, S.T. 1997. Drawing inferences: visual reconstructions in theory and practice, in Molyneaux, B. (ed.) The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology: 2248. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McFadyen, L. 2011. Practice drawing writing object, in Ingold, T. (ed.) Redrawing anthropology: materials, movements, lines: 3344. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, N. 2006. On visuality. Journal of Visual Culture 5: 5379.Google Scholar
Mirzoeff, N. 2011. The right to look: a counterhistory of visuality. Durham (NC): Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470412906062285 Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1992. The visual language of archaeology: a case study of Neanderthals. Antiquity 66: 831–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×0004477X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, S. 2001. Archaeological representation: the visual conventions for constructing knowledge about the past, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Archaeological theory today: 262–83. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Moser, S. 2014. Making expert knowledge through the image: connections between antiquarian and early modern scientific illustration. Isis 105: 5899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675551 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, M.G. 2008. Visual competence: a new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences? Visual Studies 23: 101–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276248 Google Scholar
Pauwels, L. 2008. An integrated model for conceptualising visual competence in scientific research and communication. Visual Studies 23: 147–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14725860802276305 Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1958. The excavation of the West Kennet long barrow: 1955–1956. Antiquity 32: 235–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00027253 Google Scholar
Moser, S. 1965. Archaeological draughtsmanship: principles and practice, part I: principles and retrospect. Antiquity 39: 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00031823 Google Scholar
Quality Assurance Agency. 2007. Subject benchmark statement: archaeology. Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/Archaeology.pdf (accessed 16 April 2015).Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1938. Dura-Europos and its art. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1997. Photography and archaeology, in Molyneaux, B. (ed.) The cultural life of images: visual representation in archaeology: 73107. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Svabo, C.. 2013. Archaeology and photography—a pragmatology, in González-Ruibal, A. (ed.) Reclaiming archaeology: beyond the tropes of modernity: 89102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smiles, S. & Moser, S. (ed.). 2005. Envisioning the past: archaeology & image. Oxford: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1922. The Segontium excavations, 1922. Part 1. Archaeologia Cambrensis 77: 258326.Google Scholar