Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:53:44.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

research-article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Anders Bergquist  and
Timothy Taylor
Anders Bergquist
Affiliation:
40 Kindersley Way, Abbots Langley, Watford WD5 0DQ
Timothy Taylor
Affiliation:
Queen's College/Department of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Late last year, the British Museum showed a new Thracian treasure from Rogozen in Bulgaria (Fol et al. 1986), including over 150 silver-gilt vessels and a superb discovery in itself. Here the evidence of Rogozen is taken as another clue in finding the origin of perhaps the most famed single find from later prehistoric Europe.

Type
Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 231 , March 1987 , pp. 10 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alföldy, G. 1974. Noricum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Allen, D.F. 1968. A hoard of Danubian tetradrachms from England, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte 18: 113–18.Google Scholar
Allen, D.F. 1971. The Sark Hoard, Archaeologia 103: 1–31.Google Scholar
Arbman, H. 1948. Gundestrupkitteln – ett galliskt arbete?, Tor 20: 109–16.Google Scholar
Benner Larsen, E. 1985. The Gundestrup Cauldron identification of tool traces, Iskos 5: 561–74. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on the Application of Scientific Methods in Archaeology, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Berciu, D. 1969. Arta traco-getica. Bucharest: Editura Aacademiei.Google Scholar
Bergquist, A.K. & Taylor, T.F.. 1986. Thrace and Gundestrup reconsidered, in Ellis-Evans, D., Griffith, J.G. and Jope, E.M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Celtic Studies, Oxford, 1983: 268–9. Oxford: D. Ellis Evans.Google Scholar
Bober, P.P. 1951. Cernunnos: origin and transformation of a Celtic divinity, American Journal of Archaeology 55: 13–51.Google Scholar
Crişan, I.H. 1975. La necropole de Fîntînele et son importance pour la problème des Celtes en Europe centrale, in Fitz, J. (ed.). The Celts in central Europe: 185–6. Székesfehérvár: A Fejér Megyei Múzeumok lgazgatósága.Google Scholar
Diacoviciu, H. et al. 1972. Illiri şi Daci. Cluj-Bucharest: I.P. Sibiu.Google Scholar
Domaradski, M. 1984. Keltite na Balkanskiya Poluostrov. Sofia: Nauka i Izkustvo.Google Scholar
Drexel, F. 1915. Über den Silberkessel von Gundestrup, Jahrbuch des Kaiserlichen Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 30: 1–36.Google Scholar
Ebert, M. 1926. Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte IV (1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fetich, N. 1953. Archäologische Beiträge zur Geschichte der sarmatisch-dakischen Beziehungen, Acta Archaeologica Hungarica 3: 127–78.Google Scholar
Fol, A. & Mazarov, I.. 1977. Thrace and the Thracians. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
Fol, A., Nikolov, B. & Hoddinott, R.F.. 1986. The new Thracian treasure from Rogozen, Bulgaria. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Foster, J. 1977. Bronze boar figurines in iron age and Roman Britain. Oxford : BAR. British series 39.Google Scholar
Green, M.J. 1984. The wheel as a cult symbol in the Romano-Celtic world; with special reference to Gaul and Britain. Brussels: Collection Latomus. No. 183.Google Scholar
Grosse, R. 1963. Der Silberkessel von Gundestrup, ein Rätsel keltische Kunst. Dornach: Goetheanum.Google Scholar
Gschwandler, K. 1981. Dakische Schatzfunde und griechisch-Römische Bronzen aus dem Gebiet der sozialistischen Republik Rumänien, in Die Daker: 225–36. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern. Vienna Catalogue.Google Scholar
Hoddinott, R.F. 1981. The Thracians. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Horedt, K. 1967. Zur Herkunft und Datierung des Kessels von Gundestrup, Jahrbuch der Römischgermanischen Zentralmuzeum Mainz 14: 134–43.Google Scholar
Jope, E.M. & Hawkes, C.F.C.. 1984. Celtic studies, Oxford, July 1983, Antiquity 58: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O. 1953. The bronze cauldron from Brå. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications 3.Google Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O. 1959. The Gundestrup bowl – a reassessment, Antiquity 33: 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O. 1961. Gundestrupkedelen. Copenhagen: Nationalmuseet.Google Scholar
Laet, S. J. de & Lambrechts, P.. 1950. Traces du culte de Mithra sur le chaudron de Gundestrup, Actes du troisième Congrès International des sociétés pré- et protohistoriques: 304–6. Zurich: City-Druck.Google Scholar
Manneke, P. 1971. Fornborgen vid Havor i Hablingbo, Gotiändsk Arkiv 43: 104–5.Google Scholar
Mantsevich, A. 1959. Serebryani Sosud Masiuginskogo Kurgana, Acta Archaeologica Hungarica 9: 315–33.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 1970. Art of the European Iron Age. Bath: Adams & Dart.Google Scholar
Meyers, P. 1982. Three silver objects from Thrace: a technical examination, Metropolitan Museum Journal 16 (1981): 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molen, J.R. Ter & Kuyken-Schneider, D.V. (ed.). 1984. Het Goud der Thraciērs. Rotterdam: Museum Boymansvan Beuningen.Google Scholar
Müller, S. 1892. Det store sølvkar fra Gundestrup i Jylland, Nordiske Fortidsminder 1: 35–68.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 1962. Skatten från Havors fornborg, in Hamberg, P.G. (ed.), Proximo Thule: Sverige och Europa i Forntid och Medeitid: 94–112. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 1967. Guldringen från Havor och den stora silverkitteln från Gundestrup, Fornvännen 62: 50–52.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 1968. Gundestrup och den trakiska konsten, Tor 12: 133–73.Google Scholar
Nylén, E. 1970. Der Norden und die Verbindungen mit dem thrakisch-dakischen Raum, in Hagberg, U.E. (ed.), Studia Gotica: die eiseiizeitliche Verbindungen zwischen Schweden und Südosteuropa. Stockholm: Kungl Vitterhets Historie – Och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Odobescu, A. 1900. Le trésor de Pétrossa 1. Paris: J. Rothschild.Google Scholar
Olmsted, G.S. 1976. The Gundestrup version of Táin Bó Cuailnge, Antiquity 50: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmsted, G.S. 1979. The Gundestrup Cauldron. Brussels: Collection Latomus. No. 162.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. 1893. A Gundestrupi edény és a Csórai dombormü, Archeologiai Ertesitö 13 (3): 199–202.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1980. Supplementary notes on the illustrations, in Powell, T.G.E., The Celts, 2nd ed.: 210–17. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Pittioni, R. 1977. Bemerkungen zur religionsgeschichtlichen Interpretation des Verwahrfundes von Letniza, Bezirk Lovec, Bulgarien. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademia der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Pittioni, R. 1984. Wer hat wann und wo den Silberkessel von Gundestrup angefertigt? Veröffentlichungen der keltischen Kommission der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 3. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademia der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Powell, T.G.E. 1971. From Urartu to Gundestrup: the agency of Thracian metal-work, in Boardman, J., Brown, M.A. and Powell, T.G.E. (ed.), The European community in later prehistory: 181–210. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ramskou, T. 1977. Gundestrupterrinen, Skalk, 1977 (no. 4): 32.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1894. À propos du vase de Gundestrup, L’Anthropologie 5: 456–8.Google Scholar
Reinach, S. 1904. Les carnassiers androphages dans l’art gallo-romain, Revue Celtique 25: 207–24.Google Scholar
Reinach, T. 1895. Mithradates Eupator, König von Pontus. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Reinecke, P. 1950. Antremont und Gundestrup, Praehistorische Zeitschrift 34–5 (1): 361–72.Google Scholar
Rostovtzeff, M. 1922. Iranians and Greeks in south Russia. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rusu, M. 1969. Das keltische Fürstengrab von Ciumeşti in Rumänien, Bericht der Hòmisch-germanischen Kommission 50: 267–300.Google Scholar
Rusu, M. & Bandula, O.. 1970. Mormîntul unei căpetenii celtice de la Ciumeşti. Baia Mare: Muzeul Judeţean Maramureş.Google Scholar
Sandars, N.K. 1976. Orient and orientalising: recent thoughts reviewed, in Hawkes, C.F.C. and Duval, P.M. (ed.), Celtic art in ancient Europe: five protohistoric centuries: 41–57. London: Seminar.Google Scholar
Strong, D.E. 1966. Greek and Roman gold and silver plate. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.F. 1987. Flying stags: icons and power in Thracian art, in Hodder, I.H. (ed.), The archaeology of contextual meanings: 117–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.F. forthcoming. Persian style in Thracian precious metalwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Ancient History, revised plates 4.Google Scholar
Venedikov, I. & Gerassimov, T.. 1974. Thracian art treasures. London: Caxton/Bulgarski Houdozhnik.Google Scholar
Villemos, A. 1978. Hvad nyt om Gundestrupkarret?, Fra Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark (1978): 78–84.Google Scholar
Zirra, V. 1981. Latènezeitliche Trensen in Rumànien, Hamburger Beiträge zur Archäologie 8: 115–71.Google Scholar