Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:13:26.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the archaeological record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jeremy A. Sabloff ,
Lewis R. Binford  and
Patricia A. McAnany
Jeremy A. Sabloff
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
Lewis R. Binford
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Patricia A. McAnany
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45211, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Next year will mark the twentieth birthday of the ‘New Archaeology’, whose founding texts – Binford & Binford's New perspectives in archaeology in the USA and Clarke's Analytical archaeologyin Britain – both appeared in 1968. Nearly two decades on, some fundamentals are not yet resolved, which may indicate – as Lester Embree argued in the last number of ANTIQUITY – that archaeology is a harder science than most.

Type
Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 232 , July 1987 , pp. 203 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.E.W. & Smith, W.D.. 1981. Feudal models for classic Maya civilization, in Ashmore 1981: 335–49.Google Scholar
Ashmore, W. (ed.) 1981. Lowland Maya settlement patterns, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Becker, M. 1979. Priests, peasants, and ceremonial centers: the intellectual history of a model, in Hammond, N. & Willey, G. (ed.), Maya archaeology and ethnohistory: 3–20. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1983. Working at archaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1985. ‘Brand X’ versus the recommended product, American Antiquity 50: 580–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R. & Sabloff, J.A.. 1982. Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research 38: 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, T.H. 1978. Teotihuacan, Tepeapulco, and obsfidian exploitation, Science 200: 1227–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J.E. 1986. From mountains to molehills: a critical review of Teotihuacan’s obsidian industry, in Isaac, B. (ed.), Economic aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico: 23–74. Greenwich, Connecticut: AIP Press.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R.C. 1986. Five decades of American archaeology, in Meltzer, D. et al. (ed.) 1986: 23–49.Google Scholar
Gibson, E.C. 1985. Inferred sociopolitical structure, in Willey, G. & Matthews, P. (ed.), A consideration of the Early Classic period in the Maya Lowlands: 161–74. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1980. Living archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. & Watson, P.J.. 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 355–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, D. 1986. Eoliths, archaeological ambiguity, and the generation of ‘middle range’ research, in Meltzer et al. (ed.) 1986: 77–134.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1983. Lords of the jungle: a prosopography of Maya archaeology, in Leventhal, R. & Kolata, A. (ed.), Civilization in the ancient Americas; essays in honor of Gordon R. Willey: 3–32. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, P.D. & Turner II, B.L.. 1978. Pre-Hispanic Maya agriculture. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Hirth, K.G. 1984. The analysis of prehistoric economic systems: a look to the future, in Hirth, K.G. (ed.), Trade and exchange in early Mesoamerica: 281–302. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, B.L. 1986. Introduction, in Isaac, B. (ed.), Economic aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico: 1–19. Greenwich, Connecticut: AIP Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1983. Lowland Maya archaeology at the crossroads, American Antiquity 48: 454–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcanany, P.A. 1986. Lithic technology and exchange among wetland farmers of the Eastern Maya Lowlands. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D., Fowler, D. & Sabloff, J. (ed.). 1986. American archaeology past and future. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J.A. & Keene, A.S. (ed.). 1983. Archaeological hammers and theories. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morley, S.G., Brainerd, G.W. & Sharer, R.J.. 1983. The ancient Maya.. 4th edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1982. New directions in archaeological methodology: some implications for Mesoamerican archaeology. Paper presented at a meeting of the Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología in Zamora, Mexico Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1983. Classic Maya settlement pattern studies: past problems, future prospects, in Vogt, E. & Leventhal, R. (ed.), Prehistoric settlement pattern studies: retrospect and prospect: 413–22. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. 1986. Interaction among Classic Maya polities: a preliminary examination, in Renfrew, C. and Cherry, J. (ed.), Peer polity interaction and sociopolitical change: 109–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabloff, J.A. & Rathje, W.L.. 1975. The rise of a Maya merchant class, Scientific American 223(4): 77–82.Google Scholar
Sanders, W.T. 1956. The Central Mexican symbiotic region, in Willey, G. (ed.), Prehistoric settlement patterns in the New World: 115–27. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sanders, W.T. 1977. Resource utilization and political evolution in the Teotihuacan Valley, in Hill, J. (ed.), Explanation of prehistoric change. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, W.T. & Price, B.J.. 1968. Mesoamerica: the evolution of a civilization. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Google Scholar
Santley, R.S. 1984. Obsidian exchange, economic stratification, and the evolution of complex society in the Basin of Mexico, in Hirth 1984: 43–86.Google Scholar
Sharer, R.J. & Ashmore, W.. 1979. Fundamentals of archaeology. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar
Spence, M.W. 1984. Craft production and polity in early Teotihuacan, in Hirth 1984: 87–114.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J. 1986. Archaeological interpretation, 1985, in Meltzer et al. (ed.) 1986: 439–58.Google Scholar
Wilk, R.R. 1985. The ancient Maya and the political present, Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, G.R. 1981. Maya lowland settlement patterns: a summary review, in Ashmore 1981: 385–415,Google Scholar
Willey, G.R. 1985. The Early Classic in the Maya Lowlands: an overview in Willey, G. & Matthews, P. (ed.), A consideration of the Early Classic period in the Maya Lowlands: 175–184. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Willey, G.R. & Sabloff, J.A.. 1980. A history of American archaeology. 2nd edition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar