Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:53:03.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tutankhamun and the end of the 18th Dynasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

H. W. Fairman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It would be presumption for a non-medical man to comment upon the anatomical findings of Professor Harrison and Dr Abdalla until the facts and the inferences that can be drawn from them have been fully published. This article, then, cannot claim to be more than a commentary and speculation on those facts that are at present available.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 46 , Issue 181 , March 1972 , pp. 15 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We asked Professor H. W. Fairman, Professor of Egyptology in the University of Liverpool, to write for us a brief commentary on the significance of the findings of their re-examination of Tutankhamun's mummy, reported by Professor Harrison and Dr Abdalla on pp. 8–14 of this issue. He says that it is hardly possible to present a final and definitive commentary on the results of the re-examination until they have been fully published and analysed.

References

Aldred, Cyril. 1969. Akhenaten : Pharaoh of Egypt (London).Google Scholar
Černý, J. 1965. Hieratic Inscriptions from the Tomb of Tutankhamun (Oxford).Google Scholar
Derry, Douglas E. 1927. Report upon the Examination of Tut-ankh-Amen’s Mummy, Appendix I in Howard carter, The Tomb of Tut-ankh-Amen, vol. 11 (London).Google Scholar
Derry, Douglas E. 1931. Note on the Skeleton hitherto believed to be that of King Akhenaten, Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Egypte, XXXI, 115–9.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E. S. 1940. The Prudhoe Lions, Liverpool Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology, XXVI, 3–9.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E. S. 1939. Hieroglyphic Texts from Egyptian Stelae etc., VIII. (London: British Museum).Google Scholar
Harrison, R. G. 1966. An anatomical examination of the Pharaonic remains purported to be Akhenaten, J. Egyptian Archaeology, LII, 95–119.10.2307/3855823Google Scholar
Harrison, R. G., Connolly, R. C. and Abdalla, A.. 1969. Kinship of Smenkhkare and Tutankhamun affirmed by serological micromethod, Nature, 224, 325–6.10.1038/224325b0Google Scholar
Hayes, William C. 1951. Inscriptions from the Palace of Amenhotep III, J. Near Eastern Studies, X, 35–56; 82–111; 231–42.10.1086/371010Google Scholar
Roeder, g. 1969. Amarna-Blocke aus Hermopolis (Hildesheim).Google Scholar
Vandier, Jacques. 1967. Toutankhamon et sa famille, son règne, Journal des Savants, April-June, 1967. 65–91.Google Scholar
Varille, Alexandre. 1940. Toutankhamon est-il fils d’Aménophis III et de Satamon? Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Egypte, XL, 651–7.Google Scholar