Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:48:55.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tula Adze: manufacture and purpose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Mark W. Moore
Mark W. Moore*
Affiliation:
University of New England, Department of Human and Environmental Studies, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Toolmakers in Queensland Australia used ingenious knapping techniques to produce an implement with a large bulb of percussion and a gouge-shaped cutting edge: the “gull-wing tula adze”. The author concludes that the tool results from a unique compromise between an inefficient knapping technique and a peculiar – but in this case desirable – phenomenon of fracture mechanics

Keywords

LithicsAustraliaQueensland
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 299 , March 2004 , pp. 61 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahler, S.A. & Geib, P.R. 2000. Why flute? Folsom point design and adaptation. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 799–820.Google Scholar
Aikens, C.M. & Higuchi, T. 1982. Prehistory of Japan. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aiston, G. 1928. Chipped stone tools of the Aboriginal tribes east and north-east of Lake Eyre, South Australia. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania: 123–31.Google Scholar
Aiston, G. 1929. Method of mounting stone tools on koondi, tribes east and north-east of Lake Eyre. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania: 44–6.Google Scholar
Amick, D.S. (ed.). 1999. Folsom lithic technology: explorations in structure and variation. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 12.Google Scholar
Amick, D.S. 1999. New approaches to understanding Folsom lithic technology, in Amick, D.S. (ed.): 1–11.Google Scholar
Austin, R.J. 1986. The experimental reproduction and archaeological occurrence of biface notching flakes. Lithic Technology 15: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961. Typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Bordeaux: Institut de Préhistoire, Université de Bordeaux, Mémoire 1.Google Scholar
Bradley, B.A. 1993. Paleo-Indian flaked stone technology in the North American high plains, in Soffer, O. and Praslov, N.D. (ed.), From Kostenki to Clovis: Upper Paleolithic- Paleo-Indian adaptations: 251–262. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flenniken, J.J. & White, J.P. 1985. Australian flaked stone tools: a technological perspective. Records of the Australian Museum 36: 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, G.C. & Bradley, B.A. 1982 Fluting of Folsom projectile points, in Frison, G.C. and Stanford, D.J. (ed.), The Agate Basin Site: a record of the Paleoindian occupation of the northwestern high plains: 209–12. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A.J.H. & Van Riet Lowe, C. 1929. The stone age cultures of South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 27.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. 1978. The anthropology of human residues. American Anthropologist 80: 815–35.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A. Koster, D.A. & Sontz, A.H.L. 1971. The lithic assemblage of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia. American Antiquity 36: 149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, B. 1979. Palaeolithic reflections: lithic technology and ethnographic excavations among Australian Aborigines. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Horne, G. & Aiston, G. 1924. Savage life in Central Australia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ingbar, E.E. & Hoffman, J.L.. 1999. Folsom fluting fallacies. In Amick, D.S. (ed.): 98–110.Google Scholar
Inizan, M.-L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H. & Tixier, J.. 1999. Technology and terminology of knapped stone. Nanterre: Cercle de Recherches et d’Etudes Préhistoriques, Préhistoire de la Pierre Taillée 5.Google Scholar
Kamminga, J. 1982. Over the edge: functional analysis of Australian stone tools. St Lucia: Anthropology Museum, University of Queensland, Occasional Papers in Anthropology 12.Google Scholar
Kamminga, J. 1985 The pirri graver. Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 2–25.Google Scholar
Mccarthy, F.D. 1976. Australian Aboriginal stone implements, second edition. Sydney: Australian Museum Trust, Sydney.Google Scholar
Moore, M.W. 2000. Lithic technology in Tasmania. Archaeology in Oceania 35: 57–73.Google Scholar
Moore, M.W. 2003a. Australian Aboriginal biface reduction techniques on the Georgina River, Camooweal, Queensland. Australian Archaeology 56: 22–34 Google Scholar
Moore, M.W. 2003b. The flexibility of stone tool manufacturing methods on the Georgina River, Camooweal, Queensland. Archaeology in Oceania 38: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.W. 2003c. Australian Aboriginal blade production methods on the Georgina River, Camooweal, Queensland. Lithic Technology 28: 35–63.Google Scholar
Mountford, C.P. 1941. An unrecorded method of manufacturing wooden implements by simple stone tools. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 65: 312–16.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, J. & Kamminga, J. 1999. Prehistory of Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Murray, T. & White, J.P. 1981. Cambridge in the bush? Archaeology in Australia and New Guinea. World Archaeology 13: 255–63.Google Scholar
Roth, W.E. 1904. Domestic implements, arts, and manufactures. Brisbane: The Home Secretary’s Department, Department of Public Lands, North Queensland Ethnography Bulletin No. 7.Google Scholar
Sheridan, G. 1979. Tulas and Triodia. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Prehistory and Anthropology, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Takashi, I. 1987. The Palaeolithic Age, in Kiyotari, T. (ed.) Recent archaeological discoveries in Japan: 5–23. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.F. 1964. Some wood and stone implements of the Bindibu tribe of central Western Australia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 17: 400–22.Google Scholar
Tindale, N.B. 1965. Stone implement making among the Nakako, Ngadadjara, and Pitjandjara of the Great Western Desert. Records of the South Australian Museum 15: 131–64.Google Scholar
Titmus, G.L. 1985. Some aspects of stone tool notching, in Plew, M.G., Woods, J.C. & Pavesic, M.G. (ed.), Stone tool analysis: 243–63. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Van Peer, P. 1992. The Levallois reduction strategy. Madison: Prehistory Press, Monographs in World Archaeology 13.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J.C. 1994. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar