Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:16:55.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toggle Pins in Cyprus (Plate II)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

James R. Stewart
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and News
Information
Antiquity , Volume 14 , Issue 54 , June 1940 , pp. 204 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quarterly of the Dept. of Antiquities in Palestine, 1936–7, vol. VI, 173.

2 Ibid. p. 181, fig. 7.

3 Ibid. p. 177, fig. 5b.

4 Ibid. p. 178, fig. 6e.

5 Ibid. p. 183, fig. 8.

6 Engberg and Shipton, ‘Notes on the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Pottery of Megiddo’, p. 76, fig. 20 A, B. Guy and Engberg, ‘Megiddo Tombs’, p. 169, nos. 2 and 3; plate 102, nos. 9 and 10. But the best illustration is that used by Madame Henschel-Simon, cf. D.A.P. vi, pl. LXVII, no. 1.

7 Annual of the American Schools of Oriental Research, xin, p. 98; corrected in the text to include 1 and H only.

8 Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, no. 71, p. 32.

9 Byblos et L’Egypt, p. 123, pl. LXIX. But the type is commoner than Madame Simon supposes :—Syria, X, pl. XXXVII; Dunand, ‘Fouilles de Byblos,’ pl. LXIX and CIV.

10 AASOR. XVII, p. 25.

11 Liverpool Annals of Archaeology, VI, 87 ff, pl. XXI.

12 Q.D.A.P. VI, p. 183.

13 Excavations at Tepe Gawra, I, 114.

14 Iraq, IV, 132, no. 5, fig. 12, no. 5.

15 Schmidt : Schliemanns Sammlung, no. 6411, p. 254. Dörpfeld : ‘Troja und Ilion’, I, p. 357, fig, 295.

16 American Journal of Archaeology, 1934, p. 230.

17 The Alishar Hüyük; seasons of 1928 and 1929, I, p. 60, fig. 69, no. b512.

18 Megiddo Tombs, p. 169.

19 The Alishar Hüyük; seasons of 1930–32, II, 258, fig. 283.

20 Eurasia Septentrionalis, VII, 113 ff.

21 Also illustrated by Hubert, Syria, VI, 24, fig. 7.

22 Q.D.A.P. VI, 180.

23 Swedish Cyprus Expedition, I, p. 93, pl. XXIII.

24 Palestine Exploration Quarterly, op. cit.

25 Myres, Handbook of Cesnola Collection, p. 475.

26 Tomb 318, no. 24, S.C.E. I, p. 127, pl. XXII and CXLIV (no. 4).

27 As assumed in Megiddo Tombs, p. 169.

28 Troja and Ilion, I, op. cit.

29 The similar pin from Alaca Höyük (Türk Tarih Kurumu, Belleten, 1937, I, 238, fig. 5, no. 28, and Alaca Höyük Hafriyati, 1935, pl. LXI, 28), appears to have had the hole drilled after casting. The period would appear to be of the Hittite Empires.