Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:06:58.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Through the looking glass: nationalism, archaeology and the politics of identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Yannis Hamilakis
Yannis Hamilakis*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Wales Lampeter, Lampeter, Ceredigion SA48 7ED, Wales. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 270 , December 1996 , pp. 975 - 978
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, V. 1991, Imagined communities. London: Vorso.Google Scholar
Fabian, J. 1991. Dilemmas of critical anthropology, in Fabian, J., Time and the work of anthropology: critical essays 1971-1991: 245-64. Chur: Harwood.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 1992a. The past in the future: history and the politics of identity, American Anthropologist 94(4):837-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J. 1992b. Myth, history and political identity, Cultural Anthropology 7:194-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves-Brown, P., Jones, S. & Gamble, C. (ed.). 1996. Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. B. 1996. Recuperating masculinity: Hindu nationalism, violence and the exorcism of the Muslim ‘other’, Critique of Anthropology 16(2):137–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. D. 1992. Contested pasts and the practice of anthropology, American Anthropologist 94(4): 809–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapferer, B. 1988. Legends of people, myths of State. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kohl, P. 1993. Limits to a post-processual archaeology or the dangers of a new scholasticism, in Yoffee, N. & Shcrratt, A. (ed.), Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda?: 13–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, K., Hung, F. & Crawford, H.. 1995. Prehistory as propaganda, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 6: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosse, G. L. 1988 [1985]. Nationalism and sexuality: middle class morality and sexual norms in modern Europe. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nash, C. 1993. ‘Embodying the nation’ — the west of Ireland landscape and Irish identity, in Cronin, M. & Connor, B.O' (od.), Tourism and Ireland: a critical analysis: 86–114. Cork: Cork University Press.Google Scholar
Pluciennik, M. 1996. Comment on MacDonald et al., Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 7: 5–7.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1994. The politics of identity in archaeology, in Bond, G. C. & Gilliam, A. (ed.), The social construction of the past: representation as power: 129-43. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuel, R. 1994. Theatres of memory 1: past and present in contemporary culture. London: Vorso.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C.. 1992. Re-constructing archaeology. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. 1994. Colonialism's culture: anthropology, travel and government. Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar
Woods, J. 1996. Battle sites, The Scotsman 27 July 1996: 16.Google Scholar