Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T23:50:30.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory and practice in the study of Mesopotamian domestic space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Paolo Brusasco
Paolo Brusasco*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Turin, via Giolitti 21/E, Turin 10123, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study compares the results of space syntax analysis of houses in Babylonian Ur with similar analyses on modern households in Baghdad and among the Ashanti. The social organisations identified were then compared with the written evidence for Ur surviving on site in cuneiform tablets. This opportunity to examine spatial, ethnographic and documentary evidence together offers a deep reading of Ur society.

Keywords

IraqUr housessocial psychologynetwork chartsethnographyfamily archives
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 78 , Issue 299 , March 2004 , pp. 142 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Azzawi, S.H. 1969. Oriental Houses in Iraq, in Oliver, P. (ed.) Shelter and Society: 91–102. London: Barrie & Jenkins Ltd.Google Scholar
Ardener, S. 1993. Ground Rules and Social Maps for Women: An Introduction, in Ardener, S. (ed.) Women and Space. Ground Rules and Social Maps: 1–30. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. 1965. Eye-contact, Distance, and Affiliation. Sociometry 28 (1): 289–304.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. 1970. Women’s Role in Economic Development. London.Google Scholar
Brusasco, P. 2000. Family Archives and the Social Use of Space in OB Ur. Mesopotamia Monographs, University of Turin.Google Scholar
Canter, D. 1991. Social past and social present: The archaeological dimensions to environmental psychology, in Grøn, O., Engelstad, E. & Lindblom, I. (eds.) Social space — Human Spatial Behaviour in Dwellings and Settlements: 10–16. Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Driver, G.R. & Miles, J.C. 1952. The Babylonian Laws. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Figulla, H.H. & Martin, W.J. 1953. Letters and Documents of the Old–Babylonian Period. Ur Excavations Texts V. London and Bradford: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1976. On the scope and function of hermeneutic reflection, in Linge, D. (ed.) Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Gnivecki, P. 1987. On the Quantitative Derivation of Household Spatial Organisation from Archaeological Residues in Ancient Mesopotamia, in Kent, S. (ed.) Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: an EthnoarchaeologicalApproach: 176–235. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1976. Production and Reproduction. A Comparative Study of the Domestic Domain. Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology 17, Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, D. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hillier, B & Hanson, J. 1984. The social logic of space. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991. Gender Representation and Social Reality, in Walde, D. & Willows, N.D. (eds.) The Archaeology of Gender: 11–16. Calgary: Archaeological Association.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A. 1972. Nonverbal Communication. Chicago and New York: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. 1994. Separation or Seclusion? Towards an Archaeological Approach to investigating women in the Greek Household in the Fifth to Third centuries BC, in Parker Pearson, M. & Richards, C. (eds.) Architecture and Order. Approaches to Social Space: 98–112. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973. Social Archaeology. Southampton.Google Scholar
Sanders, D. 1990. Behavioural conventions and archaeology: methods for the analysis of ancient architecture, in Kent, S. (ed.) Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space: 43–72. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. De. 1960. Course in general linguistics. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
Shanks, M & Hodder, I. 1995. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies, in Hodder, I., Shanks, M., Alexandri, H., Buchli, V, Carman, J., Last, J. & Lucas, G. (eds.) Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past: 3–29. London.Google Scholar
Sommer, R. 1961. Leadership and group geography, Sociometry 24 (1): 99–100.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. (ed.). 1993. Interpretative Archaeology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Woolley, L. & Mallowan, M. (1976). The Old Babylonian Period. Ur Excavations Vol. 7. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar