Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:09:54.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sourcing African ivory in Chalcolithic Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Thomas X. Schuhmacher ,
João Luís Cardoso  and
Arun Banerjee
Thomas X. Schuhmacher
Affiliation:
German Archaeological Institute Madrid, Serrano 159, E-28002 Madrid, Spain; Professur für Ur- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie, Otto-Friedrich Universität, Am Kranen 14, D-96045 Bamberg, Germany (Email: [email protected])
João Luís Cardoso
Affiliation:
Universidade Aberta (Lisboa), Centro de Estudos Arqueológicos do Concelho de Oeiras, Câmara Municipal de Oeiras, Fábrica da Pólvora de Barcarena, Estrada das Fontainhas, 2745-615 Barcarena, Spain (Email: [email protected])
Arun Banerjee
Affiliation:
International Centre of Ivory Study (INCENTIVS), Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University, Becherweg 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recent review of all ivory from excavations in Chalcolithic and Beaker period Iberia shows a marked coastal distribution – which strongly suggests that the material is being brought in by sea. Using microscopy and spectroscopy, the authors were able to distinguish ivories from extinct Pleistocene elephants, Asian elephants and, mostly, from African elephants of the savannah type. This all speaks of a lively ocean trade in the first half of the third millennium BC, between the Iberian Peninsula and the north-west of Africa and perhaps deeper still into the continent.

Keywords

IberiaPortugalChalcolithicBeaker periodBronze Ageivorymaritimeoceanstrade
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 83 , Issue 322 , December 2009 , pp. 983 - 997
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, W. F. H. 1971. Order proboscidea, in Meester, J. & Setzer, H. W. (ed.) The mammals of Africa: an identification manual: Part II: 1–5. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Antunes, M. T. & Cardoso, J. L.. 1992. Quaternary elephants in Portugal: new data. Ciências da Terra 11: 17–37.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A. 2004. Vergleichende Untersuchungen der ‘Schreger-Struktur’ an Stoßzähnen von Elefanten. Mainzer naturwissenschaftliches Archiv 42: 77–88.Google Scholar
Camps, G. 1960. Les traces d'un Age du Bronze en Afrique du Nord. Revue Africaine 104: 31–55.Google Scholar
Camps-Fabrer, H. 1991a. Fiche épingle à tête aplatie ou en forme de clou, in Camps-Fabrer, H. (ed.) Fiches typologiques de l'industrie osseuse préhistorique, Cahier IV: Objets de parure. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Camps-Fabrer, H. 1991b. Fiche épingle à balustre, in Camps-Fabrer, H. (ed.) Fiches typologiques de l'industrie osseuse préhistorique, Cahier IV: Objets de parure. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J. L. 1995. Ossos de cetáceo usados no Calcolítico da Estremadura. Estudos Arqueológicos de Oeiras 5: 193–8.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J. L. 2003. O uso do marfim, no território português, durante o Calcolítico: a propósito de um alfinete recolhido no povoado pré-histórico de Leceia (Oeiras). Estudos Arqueológicos de Oeiras 11: 85–96.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J. L. 2004. Polished stone artefacts at the prehistoric settlement of Leceia (Oeiras). Madrider Mitteilungen 45: 1–32.Google Scholar
Cardoso, J.L. & Soares, A. M. Monge. 1996. Contribution d'une série de datations 14C, provenant du site de Leceia (Oeiras, Portugal), à la chronologie absolue du Néolithique et du Chalcolithique de l'Estremadura Portugaise, in Actes du Colloque de Périgueux 1995, Supplément á la Revue d ‘Archéométrie: 45–50. Rennes: Université de Rennes I.Google Scholar
Daugas, J.-P. 2002. Le néolithique du Maroc: pour un modèle d'évolution chronologique et culturelle. Bulletin d'Archéologie Marocaine 19: 135–75.Google Scholar
Delibes, G. 2000. Cinabrio, huesos pintados en rojo y tumbas de ocre: Prácticas de embalsamiento en la prehistoria, in Domenech, M. Olcina & Díaz, J. A. Soler (ed.) Scripta in Honorem Enrique A. Llobregat Conesa I : 223–36. Alicante: Consell Valencià de Cultura and others.Google Scholar
Drauschke, J. & Banerjee, A.. 2007. Zur Identifikation, Herkunft und Verarbeitung von Elfenbein in der Merowingerzeit. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 37: 109–28.Google Scholar
Eggert, L. S., Rasner, C. A. & Woodruff, D. S.. 2002. The evolution and phylogeography of the African Elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 269: 1993–2006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gautier, A., Schild, R., Wendorf, R. & Stafford, T. W.. 1994. One elephant doesn't make a savanna. Palaeoecological significance of Loxodonta africana in the Holocene Sahara. Sahara 6: 7–20.Google Scholar
Götze, A. 1925. cf. Elfenbein, Europa, in Ebert, M. (ed.) Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte, Volume 3: 87. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J. & Gilman, A.. 1977. Trade in the second and third millennia BC between the Maghreb and Iberia, in Markotic, V. (ed.) Ancient Europe and the Mediterranean, studies in honour of Hugh Hencken: 90–104. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Jodin, A. 1957. Les problèmes de la civilisation du vase campaniforme au Maroc. Hespéris 44: 353–60.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. & Leisner, V.. 1943. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Süden (Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 17). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. & Leisner, V.. 1959. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen (Madrider Forschungen 1.2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leisner, V. 1965. Die Megalithgräber der Iberischen Halbinsel. Der Westen. (Madrider Forschungen 1.3). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leitão, M., North, C. T., Norton, J., Da Veiga Ferreira, O. & Zbyszewski, G.. 1984. The prehistoric burial cave at Verdelha dos Ruivos (Vialonga), Portugal, in Guilaine, J. (ed.) L'âge du cuivre européen. Civilisations à vases campaniformes: 221–39. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Long, D. A., Edwards, H.G.M. & Farwell, D. W.. 2008. The Goodmanham plane: Raman spectroscopy analysis of a roman ivory artefact. Journal of Roman spectroscopy 39(3): 322–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikdad, A. 1998. Étude préliminaire et datation de quelques éléments campaniformes du site de Kehf-el-Baroud, Maroc. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archäologie 18: 243–52.Google Scholar
Morán, E. & Parreira, R.. 2004. Alcalar 7. Estudo e reabilitação de um monumento megalítico. Lisboa: IPPAR.Google Scholar
Molina, F. & Cámara, J. A.. 2005. Los Millares. Guía del yacimiento arqueológico. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Cultura.Google Scholar
Müller, R. & Cardoso, J. L.. 2008. The origin and use of copper at the Chalcolithic fortification of Leceia, Portugal. Madrider Mitteilungen 49: 64–93.Google Scholar
Pascual Benito, J.L. 1995. Origen y significado del marfil durante el Horizonte Campaniforme y los inicios de la Edad del Bronce en el País Valenciano. Saguntum 29: 19–31.Google Scholar
Poyato Holgado, C. & Grande, A. Hernando. 1988. Relaciones entre la Península Ibérica y el Norte de Africa: ‘Marfil y campaniforme’, in Perelló, E. Ripoll (ed.) Actas del Congreso Internacional ‘El Estrecho de Gibraltar’ (Ceuta 1987), Volume 1: 317–29. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.Google Scholar
Schreger, B.N.G. 1800 (writing in H. F. Isenflamm & J.Chr. Rosenmüller (ed.) Beiträge für die Zergliederungskunst I. Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, Th.X. 2004. Frühbronzezeitliche Kontakte im westlichen und zentralen Mittelmeerraum und die Rolle der Iberischen Halbinsel. Madrider Mitteilungen 45: 147–80.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, Th.X. In press. East-West relations in the Mediterranean in the third Millennium BC with reference to a slab idol from Mari (Syria). European Journal of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, Th.X & Cardoso, J. L.. 2007. Ivory objects from the chalcolithic fortification of Leceia (Oeiras). Estudos Arqueologicos de Oeiras 15: 95–118.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. 1974. The elephant in the Greek and Roman World. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Serra-Ràfols, J. De C. 1925. cf. Elfenbein, Pyrenäenhalbinsel, in Ebert, M. (ed.) Reallexikon der Vorgeschichte, Volume 3: 87–8. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siret, L. 1913. Questions de chronologie et d'éthnographie iberiques. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. 1981. Cova da Moura. Die Besiedlung des Atlantischen Küstengebietes Portugals vom Neolithikum bis an das Ende der Bronzezeit (Madrider Beiträge 7). Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Sukumar, R. 2003. The living elephants: evolutionary ecology, behaviour and conservation. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, N. E. 2001. African Elephas recki: time, space and taxonomy, in Cavaretta, G.Giolia, P., Mussi, M. & Palombo, M. R. (ed.) The world of elephants (Proceedings of the First International Congress): 693–7. Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar
Van Neer, W., Linseele, V. & Friedman, R.. 2004. Animal burials and food offerings at the Elite Cemetery HK6 of Hierakonpolis, in Hendrickx, S., Friedman, R. F., Cialowicz, K. M. & Chlodnicki, M. (ed.) Egypt at its origins: studies in memory of Barbara Adam (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 138): 67–130. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Estacio Da Veiga, S. P. M. 1886, 1887, 1889, 1891. Palaeoethnologia. Antiguidades monumentaes do Algarve (4 Volumes). Lisboa: Imprenta nacional.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E. 1963. A history of domesticated animals. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar