Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:10:30.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social context of literacy in Archaic Greece and Etruria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Simon Stoddart  and
James Whitley
Simon Stoddart
Affiliation:
Magdalene College, Cambridge CB3 0AG
James Whitley
Affiliation:
British School at Athens, 52 Odos Souedias, Gr-10676, Athens, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years much emphasis has been placed upon the effects of literacy in the transformation of the Mediterranean World between 800 and 400 BC. Alphabetic scripts have been seen by many, archaeologists and classicists alike, as one of the key factors that made many of the achievements of Mediterranean, particularly Greek, thought and culture possible. Alphabetic scripts encouraged widespread literacy, and widespread literacy was the necessary condition for what remains distinctive in Ancient Greek culture, namely the development of History, Philosophy and speculative Natural Science. Murray (1980: 96) is typical in his view that ‘Archaic Greece was a literate society in the modern sense.’ The work of Goody & Watt (1963) has done much to advance the view that many of the achievements of Mediterranean Society can be ascribed to, if not entirely explained by, this ‘technology of the intellect’. Their ‘autonomous model’ however, as Cartledge (1978: 37) has observed, comes dangerously close to technological determinism.

Type
Special section: Classical matters
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 237 , December 1988 , pp. 761 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agostiniani, L. 1982. Le iscrizioni parlanti dell’antica Italia. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Aristotelis qui ferebantur Jibrorum fragmenta, Rose, V., (ed.) (1886). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Bather, A.G. 1893. The bronze fragments from the Acropolis I, Journal of Hellenic Studies 13: 124–30.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1932. Little master cups, Journal of Hellenic Studies 52: 167–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1948. Hymn to Hermes, American Journal of Archaeology 52: 336–40.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1956. Attic black figure vase painters. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1971. Paralipomena. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. & Masson, O.. 1957. Les inscriptions grecques d’Abou Simbel, Revue des Études Grecques 70: 1–46.Google Scholar
Bound, M. 1985. Una nave mercantile di età arcaica all’Isola di Giglio, in Atti dell’Incontro di Studio, 5–7 dicembre 1983, Il commercio Etrusco Arcaico: 65–70. Roma: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. Quaderni del Centro di Studio per L’Archeologia Etrusco-Italica 9.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. 1933. The antiquity of the Greek alphabet, American Journal of Archaeology 37: 8–29.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. 1938. The Greek alphabet again, American Journal of Archaeology 42: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartledge, P.A. 1978. Literacy in the Spartan oligarchy, Journal of Hellenic Studies 98: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonna, G. 1970. Una nuova iscrizione etrusca del VII secolo e appunti sulla epigrafia ceretana dell’epoca, Mélanges de l’école Française de Rome 80: 637–72.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. 1972. Appunti di epigrafia arcaica. Postilla: la più antica iscrizione di Tarquinia, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 1: 295–9.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. 1973. Appunti su Epigrafia arcaica. -II, Archeologia Classica 25–6: 151–65.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. 1975. Il ‘dono’ in Etruria arcaica, Parola del Passato 30, 132–52.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. 1976. Il sistema onomastico, Atti del Colloquio sul tema l’etrusco arcaico: 92–109. Firenze, Istituto di Studi Etruschi ed Italici.Google Scholar
Diringer, D. 1950. Early Hebrew writing, The Biblical Archaeologist 13: 74–95.Google Scholar
Goody, J. 1977. The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. & Watt, I.. 1963. The consequences of literacy, Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 304–45.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1935. Inscriptiones Creticae I: Tituli Cretae Mediae Praeter Gortynios. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1939. Inscriptiones Creticae II: Tituli Cretae Occidentalis. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1942. Inscriptiones Creticae III: Tituïi Cretae Orientalis. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. 1950. Inscriptiones Creticae IV: Tituïi Gortynii. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Harvey, P.O. 1966. Literacy in the Athenian democracy, Revue des Études Grecques 79: 585–635.Google Scholar
Havelock, E.A. 1982. The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S.C. 1980. Family tombs and tomb cult in ancient Athens: tradition or traditionalism?, Journal of Hellenic Studies 100: 96–126.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H.H. 1964. Book rolls on Attic vases, in Henderson, C. (ed.), Classical, medieval and renaissance studies in honor of Berthold Louis Ullman: 17–48. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H.H. 1973. More book rolls on Attic vases, Antike Kunst 16: 143–7.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, L.H. 1955. Further comments on Archaic Greek inscriptions, Annual of the British School at Athens 50 (1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, L.H. 1961. The local scripts of Archaic Greece. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, L.H. 1962. The inscribed gravestones of Archaic Attica, Annual of the British School of Athens 57: 115–53.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, L.H. and Morpurgo-Davies, A.. 1970. Poinikastas and Poinikazein: BM 1969.42.1 A new Archaic inscription from Crete, Kadmos 9: 118–54.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. 1983. The extent and use of literacy: the archaeological evidence, in Hägg, R. (ed.), The Greek renaissance of the eighth century BC: tradition and innovation: 63–68. Stockholm: Skrifter Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Athen.Google Scholar
Langdon, M.K. 1976. A Sanctuary of Zeus on Mount Hymettus. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens. Hesperia Supplement 16.Google Scholar
Lembessi, A. 1976. I Stiles tou Prinia. Athens: Supplement to Arkhaiologikon Deltion 22.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1980. Early Greece. Glasgow: Fontana Collins.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.G. 1985. The erection and mutilation of the Hermae, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 211: 47–73.Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, A. 1984. Le Tavole Iguvine. Firenze, Olschki. Lingue e iscrizioni dell’Italia Antica 4.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, T. 1985. Etruscan shapes in Attic pottery, Antike Kunst 28: 33–9.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, T. 1985–6. Archaeology in Etruria, 1980–85, Archaeological Reports 32, 102–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raubitschek, A.E. 1949. Dedications from the Athenian Acropolis: a catalogue of the inscriptions of the sixth and fifth centuries BC . Cambridge (MA): Archaeological Institute of America.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A.E. 1972a. The inscriptions, in Hoffman, H., Early Cretan armorers: 15–16. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Raubitschek, A.E. 1972b. Appendix I. A mitra inscribed with a law, in Hoffman, H., Early Cretan armorers: 47–9. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Rizza, G. & Santa Maria Scrinari, V.. 1968. Il Santuario sull’Acropoli di Gortina. Rome: Libreria dello Stato.Google Scholar
Stoddart, S.K.F. 1987. Complex polity formation in North Etruria and Umbria 1200–500 BC. University of Cambridge: unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. 1949. Excavations in the Athenian Agora 1948, Hesperia 18: 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar