Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:55:52.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ritual or fluvial? A further comment on the Thames skulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Barbara West
Barbara West*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H OPY, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Further (and final) comment on the origin of ancient human skulls from the River Thames (ANTIQUITY 62 (1988): 503–9; 69 (1995): 162–9) is prompted by comparison with the skulls from the London Thames tributary, the Walbrook.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 267 , March 1996 , pp. 189 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bradley, R. & Gordon, K.. 1988. Human skulls from thn River Thames, their dating and significance. Antiquity 62: 503-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, W.W. 1973. Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of differenc among recent human populations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archacology and Ethnology 67.Google Scholar
Howells, W.W. 1989. Skull shapes and the map: craniometrie analyses in the dispersion of modern Homo. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 79.Google Scholar
Knüsel, C.J. & Carr, G.G.. 1995. Oil the significance of the crania from the River Thames and its tributaries, Antiquity 69: 162–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, G. & West, B.. 1981. Skullduggery in Roman London?, Transactions of the London & Middlesex Archaeological Society 32: 86–102.Google Scholar
Merrifield, R. 1987. The archaeology of ritual and magic. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Reader, F.W. 1903. Pile structures in the Walbrook near London Wall, Archaeological journal 60: 137–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strincer, C.B. 1992. Reconstructing human evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Boyal Society of London: Biological Sciences 337 (1280): 217-24.Google Scholar

References

Howells, W.W. 1973. Cranial variation in man: a study by multivariate analysis of patterns of differenc among recent human populations. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 67.Google Scholar
Marsh, G. & West, B.. 1981. Skullduggery in Roman London? Transactions of the London & Middlesex Archaeological Society 32: 86–102.Google Scholar
Neydham, S.P. 1992. The structure of settlement and ritual in the latc Bronze Age of South-East Britain, in Mordant, C. & Richard, A. (ed.). L'hahitat et l'occupation du sol à I'Age du Bronze en Europe (Acles du Colloque International de Lons-le-Saunier, 16-19 mai 1990) 49–69. Paris: Editions du Comité des Travaux historiques et scientifiques. Documents Préhistoriques 4.Google Scholar