Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-qdpjg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T21:57:56.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refuse and the formation of middens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Stuart Needham  and
Tony Spence
Stuart Needham
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistoric and Romano-British Antiquities, The British Museum, London WC1B 3DG, England
Tony Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistoric and Romano-British Antiquities, The British Museum, London WC1B 3DG, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The prodigious quantities of refuse recovered from excavations at Runnymede Bridge, Berkshire, England — and at other late prehistoric British sites — highlight those archaeological entities we call ‘rubbish’ and ‘middens’. What is a ‘midden’? General thoughts on an archaeology of refuse are applied to the specific case of these 1st-millennium BC sites in southern England in an attempt to comprehend their origin and scale in terms of the period's social geography.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 271 , March 1997 , pp. 77 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, G. 1985. Prehistoric farming in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., Bradley, R. & Green, M.. 1991. Landscape, raonuments and society: the prehistory of Cranborne Chase. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1983. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bond, D. 1988. Excavation at the North Ring, Mucking, Essex. Chelmsford: Essex County Council. East Anglian Archaeology 43.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., Entwistle, R. & Raymond, F.. 1994. Prehistoric land divisions on Salisbury Plain. London: English Heritage. Archaeological Report 2.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. & Fulford, M.. 1980. Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 17: 85–94.Google Scholar
Brown, G., Field, D. & McOmish, D.. 1994. East Chisenbury midden complex, Wiltshire, in Fitzpatrick & Morris: 469.Google Scholar
Crowther, D. 1983. Old land surfaces and modern ploughsoil: implications of recent work at Maxey, Cambridgeshire, Scottish Archaeological Review 2(1): 31–44.Google Scholar
Cunnington, M.E. 1923. The Early Iron Age inhabited site at All Cannings Cross Farm, Wiltshire. Devizes: George Simpson.Google Scholar
Deal, M. 1985. Household pottery disposal in the Maya Highlands: an ethnoarchaeological interpretation, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4: 243–91.Google Scholar
Done, G. 1991. The animal bone, in Needham: 327–42.Google Scholar
De Brisay, K.W. & Evans, K.A. (ed.). 1975. Salt: the study of an ancient industry. Colchester: Colchester Archaeological Group.Google Scholar
Ellison, A. 1981. Towards a socioeconomic model for the Middle Bronze Age in southern Britain, in Hodder, I. et al. (ed.), Pattern of the past: studies in honour of David Clarke: 413–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A.P. & Morris, E. (ed.). 1994. The Iron Ago in Wessex: recent work. Salisbury: Association Française d'Étude de L'Age du Fer/Trust for Wessex Archaeology.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. & Cannon, A.. 1983. Where the garbage goes: refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands, journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 117–63.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1995. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. British series 242.Google Scholar
Lawson, A.f. 1994. Potterne, in Fitzpatrick & Morris: 42–6.Google Scholar
Longley, D. 1980. Runnymede Bridge 1976: excavations on the site of a Late Bronze Age settlement. Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society. Research volume 6.Google Scholar
McOmish, D. 1996. East Chisenbury: ritual and rubbish at the British Bronze Age-Iron Age transition, Antiquity 70: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, E. 1993. Settlements on hilltops: severi prehistoric sites in Suffolk. Ipswich: Suffolk County Planning Department. East Anglian Archaeology Report 65.Google Scholar
Mounteney, G. 1981. Faunai attrition and subsistence reconstruction at Thwing, in Barker, G. (ed.), Prehistoric communities in northern England: essays in social and economic reconstruction: 73–86. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1980. Discard location: the ethnographic data, American Antiquity 45: 490–502.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1991. Excavation and salvage at Runnymede Bridge 1978: the Late Bronze Age waterfront site. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1993. The structure of settlement and ritual in the Late Bronze Age of south-east Britain, in Mordant, C. & Richards, A. (ed.), L'Habitat et l'occupation du sol à l'Age du Bronze en Europe: 49–69. Paris: Editions du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques. Documents Préhistoriques 4.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. 1996. Pottery joins for understanding refuse cycles and redeposition, in Needham & Spence: 74-7.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. Forthcoming. Chronology and periodisation in the British Bronze Age, in Randsborg, K. (ed.), Absolute chronology: archaeological Europe 2500-500 BC (Verona Conference, April 1995]. Acta Archaeologica 67.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. & Ambers, J.. 1994. Redating Rams Hill and reconsidering Bronze Age enclosure, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60: 225–44.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. & Sørensen, M.-L.S.. 1988. Runnymede refuse tip: a consideration of midden deposits and their formation, in Barrett, J.C. & Kinnes, I.A. (ed.), The archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends: 113–26. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology & Prehistory, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Needham, S.P. & Shence, A.J.. 1996. Refuse and disposal at Area 16 East Runnymede. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Potter, T.W. 1987. Roman Italy: London: British Museum.Google Scholar
Rathje, W.L. 1974. The garbage project, Archaeology 27: 236–41.Google Scholar
Rathje, W.L. & Murphy, C.. 1993. Rubbish: the archaeology of garbage. New York (NY): Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. 1991. Neolithic and Late Bronze Age insect assemblages, in Needham 1991: 277–326.Google Scholar
Rodriguez Almeida, E. 1984. Il Monte Testacelo. Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Rogers, P. R. & Widdowson, E.. 1996. Midden excavation in theory and practice: a Han period midden site at Tung Wan Tsai, Ma Wan Island, Hong Kong, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 7: 31–46.Google Scholar
Russell, M. 1996. Problems of phasing: a reconsideration of the Black Patch Middle Bronze Age ‘nucleated village’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 15: 33–8.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1976. Behavioral archaeology. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B. 1987. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, D. 1991. ‘Rid Grasse of Bones’: a taphonomic study of the hones from midden deposits at the Neolithic and Bronze Age site of Runnymede, Surrey, England, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 1: 73–89.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, D. 1996. The animal bones, in Needham & Spence 1996: 194-223.Google Scholar
SøRensen, M.-L.S. 1996. Sherds and pot groups as keys to site formation process, in Needham & Spence: 61–73.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A.P. 1978. Inference and evidence in archaeology: a discussion of the conceptual problems, Advances in archaeological method and theory 1: 183–222.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A.P. 1989. The technology of ceramic re-use: formation processes and archaeological evidence, World Archaeology 21: 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R., Robinson, M., Barrett, J. & Wilson, B.. 1986. A Late Bronze Age riverside settlement at Wallingford, Oxfordshire, Archaeological Journal 143: 174–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar