Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:18:17.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recognising strategies for conquered territories: a case study from the Inka North Calchaquí Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Félix A. Acuto
Affiliation:
IMHICIHU-CONICET, Saavedra 15, Piso 5, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Email: [email protected])
Andrés Troncoso
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Chile, Ignacio Carrera Pinto 1045, Ñuñoa Santiago, Chile (Email: [email protected])
Alejandro Ferrari
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Buenos Aires, Puan 470, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Email: [email protected])

Extract

In this detailed study of fifteenth-century settlements in Argentina, the authors show how the Inka did not just use force, production and ritual to subdue the indigenous population. The conquerors' strategy included the re-ordering of settlement plans, routeways and landscape, class separation and even the imposition of a rigorous discipline on the indigenous vision, controlling what could be seen looking out or looking in. The material readings made in these South American examples have much to offer to archaeologists working in colonial periods elsewhere.

Type
Research article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuto, F.A. 2004. Landscapes of ideology and inequality: experiencing Inka domination. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.Google Scholar
Acuto, F.A. 2005. The materiality of Inka domination: landscape, spectacle, memory, and ancestors, in Funari, P.P., Zarankin, A. & Stovel, E. (ed.) Global archaeology theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts: 211-35. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
Acuto, F.A., Amuedo, C., Kergaravat, M., Ferrari, A., Gamarra, L. & Goldín, A.L.. 2008. Experiencias subjetivas en las aldeas prehispánicas del Valle Calchaquí Norte, in Borrero, L.A. & Franco, N.V. (ed.) Arqueología del extremo sur del continente americano. Resultados de nuevos proyectos: 1154. Buenos Aires: IMHICIHU-CONICET.Google Scholar
Acuto, F.A., Kergaravat, M. & Amuedo, C.. 2011. Experiencia de la muerte y la representación de las personas en las prácticas funerarias del Valle Calchaquí Norte. Comechingonia, Revista de Antropología 14: 2354.Google Scholar
Alcock, S., Sinopoli, C., D'Altroy, T.N. & Morrison, K. (ed.). 2001. Empires: perspectives from archaeology and history. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ambrosetti, J.B. 1907. Exploraciones arqueológicas en la ciudad prehistórica de La Paya. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. & Stanish, C.. 2001. Ritual and pilgrimage in the ancient Andes. The islands of the Sun and the Moon. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Besom, J.T. 2009. Of summits and sacrifices. An ethnohistoric study of Inka religious practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Coben, L.S. 2006. Other Cuzcos: replicated theaters of Inka power, in Inomata, T. & Coben, L.S. (ed.) Archaeology of performance: 223-59. Lanham (MD): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Covey, R.A. 2008. The Inca empire, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H. (ed.) Handbook of South American archaeology: 809-30. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, T.N. 2002. The Incas. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, T.N., Lorandi, A.M., Williams, V., Calderari, M., Hastorf, C., Demarrais, E. & Hagstrum, M.. 2000. Inka rule in the Northern Calchaquí Valley, Argentina. Journal of Field Archaeology 27: 126.Google Scholar
Díaz, P.P. 19781984. Diario de la excavación realizada en el sitio Tero SSalCac 14. Unpublished report prepared for Museo Arqueológico de Cachi, Cachi.Google Scholar
Díaz, P.P. 1981. Diario de excavación realizada en el sitio La Paya SSalCac 1. Unpublished report prepared for Museo Arqueológico de Cachi, Cachi.Google Scholar
Dillehay, T.D. 2003. El colonialismo Inka, el consumo de chicha y los festines desde una perspectiva de banquetes políticos. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 7: 355-63.Google Scholar
Earle, T.K. & D'Altroy, T.N.. 1989. The political economy of the Inka empire: the archaeology of power and finance, in Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. (ed.) Archaeological thought in America: 183204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, I. & Zapata, J.. 2003. Nuevos cánones de arquitectura inka: investigaciones en el sitio de Tambokancha-Tumibamba, Jaquijahuana, Cuzco. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 7: 5777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, C. 2003. Local matters: encountering the imperial Inkas in the South Andes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. 1979. El área Lupaca bajo el dominio incaico. Un reconocimiento arqueológico. Histórica 3(1): 5382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, J. 1990. Inka settlement planning. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kaulicke, P., Kondo, R., Kusuda, T. & Zapata, J.. 2003. Agua, ancestros y arqueología del paisaje. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 7: 2756.Google Scholar
Malpass, M.A. & Alconini, S.. 2010. Provincial Inka studies in the twenty-first century, in Malpass, M.A. & Alconini, S. (ed.) Distant provinces in the Inka empire: 113. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Morris, C. 1987. Arquitectura y estructura del espacio en Huánuco Pampa. Cuadernos Instituto Nacional de Antropología 12: 2745.Google Scholar
Morris, C. & Covey, R.A.. 2003. La plaza central de Huánuco Pampa: espacio y transformación. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 7: 133-49.Google Scholar
Morris, C. & Santillana, J.I.. 2007. The Inka transformation of the Chincha capital, in Burger, R.L., Morris, C. & Matos, R. (ed.) Variations in the expression of Inka power: 135-63. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Murra, J. 1978. La organización económica del Estado Inca. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Niles, S. 1992. Inca architecture and sacred landscape, in Townsend, R. (ed.) The ancient Americas: art from sacred landscapes: 346-57. Chicago (IL): The Art Institute of Chicago.Google Scholar
Niles, S. 1999. The shape of Inca history. Narrative and architecture in an Andean empire. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Pease, F. 1982. The formation of Tawantinsuyu: mechanisms of colonization and relationship with ethnic groups, in Collier, G.A., Rosaldo, R.I. & Wirth, J.D. (ed.) The Inca and Aztec states, 1400-1800: 173-98. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Staller, J.E. 2008. Dimensions of place: the significance of centers for the development of Andean civilization: an exploration of the ushnu concept, in Staller, J.E. (ed.) Pre-Columbian landscapes of creation and origin: 269314. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Troncoso, A. 2004. El arte de la dominación: arte rupestre y paisaje durante el período incaico en la cuenca superior del río Aconcagua. Chungará, Revista de Antropología Chilena 36: 553-61.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 2008. The Inca khipu: knotted-cord record keeping in the Andes, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H. (ed.) Handbook of South American archaeology: 831-44. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Van De Guchte, M. 1999. The Inca cognition of landscape: archaeology, ethnohistory, and the aesthetic of alterity, in Ashmore, W. & Knapp, B. (ed.) The archaeologies of landscapes: contemporary perspectives: 149-68. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Villacorta, L.F. 2003. Palacios y ushnus: curacas del Rimac y gobierno inca en la costa central. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 7: 151-87.Google Scholar
Zuidema, R.T. 1989. El ushnu , in Burga, M. (ed.) Reyes y guerreros: 402-54. Lima: FOMCIENCIAS.Google Scholar