Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:38:11.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power, asymmetries and how to view the Roman world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Manuel Fernández-Götz ,
Dominik Maschek  and
Nico Roymans
Manuel Fernández-Götz*
Affiliation:
School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, UK
Dominik Maschek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Classics, University of Oxford, UK
Nico Roymans
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Classics and Near Eastern Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
*
*Author for correspondence: ✉ [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 378 , December 2020 , pp. 1653 - 1656
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, A. 2018. Questioning a posthumanist political ecology: ontologies, environmental materialities, and the political in Iron Age south India, in Millhauser, J.K., Morehart, C.T. & Juarez, S. (ed.) Uneven terrain: archaeologies of political ecology (Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 29): 157–74. Arlington (VA): American Anthropological Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/apaa.12104Google Scholar
Eckstein, A.M. 2006. Mediterranean anarchy, interstate war, and the rise of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520932302Google Scholar
Fernández-Götz, M. & Arnold, B.. 2019. Internal conflict in Iron Age Europe: methodological challenges and possible scenarios. World Archaeology 51: 654–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2020.1723682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Götz, M., Maschek, D. & Roymans, N.. 2020. The dark side of the Empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime. Antiquity 94: 1630–1639. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, A. 2020. Re-balancing the Romans. Antiquity 94: 1640–42. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2019. An archaeology of the contemporary era. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441752Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2018. Where are we heading? The evolution of humans and things. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1980. Taxes and trade in the Roman Empire, 200 BC–AD 400. Journal of Roman Studies 70: 101–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/299558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, A. 2020. Seeing in the dark: Roman imperialism and material culture. Antiquity 94: 1643–45. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatchadourian, L. 2020. False dilemmas? Or what COVID-19 can teach us about material theory, responsibility and ‘hard power’. Antiquity 94: 1649–52. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magie, D. 1921. Historia Augusta (Loeb Classical Library 139). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. 1995. The darker side of the Renaissance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. 2011. The darker side of Western modernity. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Redfern, R. 2020. Iron Age ‘predatory landscapes’: a bioarchaeological and funerary exploration of captivity and enslavement in Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30: 531–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774320000062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2020. Roman wealth and wealth inequality in comparative perspective. Journal of Roman Archaeology 33: 341–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104775942000104XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, R.M. In press. Ethics, not objects. Cambridge Archaeological Journal.Google Scholar
Versluys, M.J. 2020. Nothing else to think? Antiquity 94: 1646–48. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.186CrossRefGoogle Scholar