Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:01:54.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plus français que les Français

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

G. A. Clark
G. A. Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Box 872402, Tempe AZ 85287-2402, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The reactions to the N&B essay tell more about epistemological concerns (or lack thereof) than they do about construals of pattern and of what pattern might mean in Levantine Epipalaeolithic archaeology.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 267 , March 1996 , pp. 138 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, G.A. 1993. Paradigms in science and archeology, Journal of Archeologicaì Research 1: 203-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.A. 1994. Migration as an explanatory concept in Paleolithic archeology, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 305-43.Google Scholar
Clark, G.A. & Lindly, J.. 1991. Paradigmatic biases and Paleolithic research traditions, Current Anthropology 32: 577-87.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. 1995. Mousterian Iithic technology: an ecologica! perspective. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar