Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:47:50.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plank-built in the Bronze Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

J. R. Hale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1972 Paul Johnstone initiated a project to build and sail a hide-covered boat which would embody the theories of those Norwegian scholars—in particular Professor Sverre Marstrander—who have classified the boats of the Scandinavian Bronze Age with the Eskimo umiak and the Irish curragh. Thanks to the publicity given the experimental model by the BBC ‘Chronicle’ series and the enthusiastic advocacy of Bregger, Marstrander and Johnstone himself (‘Bronze age sea trial’, Antiquity, XLVI, 1972), the skin-boat theory has become almost an orthodoxy in Britain and Scandinavia. In fact, however, the reconstructed boat itself clearly demonstrated the awkwardness of translating into the medium of a hidecovered frame the boat designs of the bronze age rock art, which include several features utterly irreconcilable with the requirements and norms of skin-boat construction.

For no type of boat before the age of photography has such a vast corpus of evidence been preserved as for the vessel that served the fishermen, traders and raiding parties of Scandinavia between 1200 and 600 BC (that is, the Bronze Age periods 111, IV and V). The boat is a favoured motif in thousands of rock carvings in southern Norway, Sweden, and the Baltic islands, and on at least 200 late bronze age razors from Denmark and North Germany.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 211 , July 1980 , pp. 118 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARIMA, E.Y. 1963. Report on an Eskimo umiak built at P.Q. Ivuyivik, in the summer of 1960, National Museum of Canada, Bulletin No. 189 (Ottawa).Google Scholar
BALTZER, L. 1881—1908. Glyphes des rochers du Bohuslän, I—II (Gothenburg).Google Scholar
BOWEN, R.L. 1963. A Melanesian outrigger, American Neptune, XXIII, 255—60.Google Scholar
BRØGGER, A.W.&H. shetelig. 1971. The Viking ships: their ancestry and evolution (London).Google Scholar
CEDERLUND, C.O. 1977. Recording the remains of a sewn boat found at Skeppargatan 4 in Stockholm, in (ed.) MCGRAIL, S. Sources and techniques in boat archaeology (Greenwich).Google Scholar
CRUMLIN-PEDERSON, O. 1972. Skin or wood? A study of the origin of the Scandinavian plank-boat, in (eds) HASSLOF, O. et al., Ships and shipyards, sailors and fishermen (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
DURHAM, B. 1960. Canoes and kayaks of Western America (Seattle).Google Scholar
EDWARDS, C. 1965. Aboriginal watercraft of the Pacific coast of South America (Los Angeles).Google Scholar
FOLKARD, H.C. 1901. The sailing boat (London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GILLMER, T.C. 1973. Working watercraft (London).Google Scholar
GREENHILL, B. 1976. The archaeology of the boat (London).Google Scholar
HADDON, A.C. & HORNELL, J. 1936. Canoes of Oceania (Honolulu).Google Scholar
HAMPE, R. 1946. Friihe Griechische Sagenbilder in Bootien (Athens).Google Scholar
HORNELL, J. 1938. British coracles and Irish curraghs (London).Google Scholar
JOHNSTONE, P. 1972. Bronze age sea trial, Antiquity, XLVI, 269—74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOLLMAN, P. 1899. Victoria Nyanza (London).Google Scholar
LANDSTROM, B. 1961. The ship (London).Google Scholar
LETHBRIDGE, T.C. 1952. Boats and boatmen (London).Google Scholar
LEVIN, M. & POTAPOV, L. 1964. The peoples of Siberia (with atlas). (Chicago).Google Scholar
MACRITCHIE, D. 1892. The Ainos, Supplement au Tome IV des Archives Internationales d‘Ethnographic (Leiden).Google Scholar
MADSEN, P.K. 1977. Genforening, Skalk, No.2.Google Scholar
MARSTRANDER, S. 1963. Østfolds jordbrukstistninger : Skjeberg (Oslo).Google Scholar
MULLER-WISMAR, W. 1912. Austroinsulare Kanus als Kult- und Kriege-symbole, Baessler Archiv., II, 235—49.Google Scholar
NICOLAYSEN, N. 1882. The Viking-ship discovered at Gokstad in Norway (Oslo).Google Scholar
PARIS, E.DE. 1845. Essai sur la construction navale des peuples extra-Européennes (Paris).Google Scholar
POPOV, A.A. 1966. The Nganasan (Bloomington, Indiana).Google Scholar
PORSILD, M.P. 1915. The material culture of the Eskimo in West Greenland, Meddelelser om GrØdand, LI, III—250.Google Scholar
REBUFFAT, R. 1977. Naissance de la marine Etrusque, Dossiers de l’archeélogie, XXIV, 50—8.Google Scholar
RUDOLPH, W. 1974. Inshore fishing craft of the Southern Baltic from Holstein to Curonia (Greenwich).Google Scholar
SHEPPARD, T. 1910. The prehistoric boat from Brigg, Trans.E. Riding Antiq. Soc., XVI, 33–60.Google Scholar
SHETELIG, H. & FALK, H. 1937. Scandinavian archaeology (Oxford).Google Scholar
STEENSBY, H.P. 1912. Etnografiske og antropogeo- grafiske Rejsestudier i Nord GrØnland 1909. Meddelelser om Grenland, L, 133—73.Google Scholar
WORTHINGTON, E.B. 1933. Primitive craft of the Central African lakes, The Mariner’s Mirror, XIX, 146—63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar