Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:34:36.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palaeoecology and the perception of prehistoric landscapes: some comments on visual approaches to phenomenology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Henry P. Chapman  and
Benjamin R. Gearey
Henry P. Chapman
Affiliation:
Centre for Wetland Archaeology, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England [email protected]@geo.hull.ac.uk
Benjamin R. Gearey
Affiliation:
Centre for Wetland Archaeology, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, England [email protected]@geo.hull.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interpretation of archaeological landscapes has developed within two main disciplines. Social theory has provided a foundation for understanding cultural landscapes, and palaeoecology has provided techniques for understanding physical landscapes. Despite their potentially complementary nature, the two approaches remain polarized, and as described here, result in the incomplete studies of past landscapes.

Keywords

Landscapepalaeoecologyvisibility analysisLeskernick
Type
News and notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 284 , June 2000 , pp. 316 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, B. (ed.). 1993. Landscape: politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bender, B., Hamilton, S. & Tilley, G.. 1997. Leskernick: stone worlds; alternative narratives; nested landscapes, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63: 147–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.P. 1977. Late Devensian and Flandrian vegetational history of Bodmin Moor, Cornwall, Philosophical Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B276: 251–320.Google Scholar
Brown, A.P. 1997. Clearance and clearings: deforestation in Neolithic Britain, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16: 133–46.Google Scholar
Caseldine, C.J. & Maguire, D.J.. 1981. A review of the prehistoric and historic environment on Dartmoor, Proceedings of the Devon Archaeological Society 39: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 1989. Geography is everywhere: culture and symbolism in human landscapes, in Gregory, D. & Walford, R. (ed.), Horizons in human geography: 118–35. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Devereux, P. 1991. Three-dimensional aspects of apparent relationships between selected natural and artificial features within the topography of the Avebury complex, Antiquity 65: 894–8.Google Scholar
Evans, C Pollard, J. & Knight, M.. 1999. Life in woods: tree-throws, ‘settlement’ and forest cognition, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18: 241–54.Google Scholar
Fisher, P., Farrelly, C. Maddocks, A. & Ruggles, C.. 1997. Spatial analysis of visible areas from the Bronze Age cairns of Mull, Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 258–92.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. 1999. Phenomenology and the megaliths of Wales: a dreaming too far, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 18: 119–25.Google Scholar
Gearey, B.R. 1996. Human environment relations on Bodmin Moor during the Holocene. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Plymouth.Google Scholar
Gearey, B. & Charman, D.. 1996. Rough Tor, Bodmin Moor: testing some archaeological hypotheses with landscape scale palynology, in Charman, D.J. Newnham, R.M. & Croot, D.G. (ed.), Devon and East Cornwall Field Guide: 109–19. London: Quaternary Research Association.Google Scholar
Gearey, B.R., Charman, D.J. & Kent, M.. In press. Palaeoecological evidence for the prehistoric settlement of Bodmin Moor, Cornwall: Part 1: The status of woodland and early human impacts, Journal of Archaeological Science.Google Scholar
Herring, P. & Lewis, B.. 1992. Ploughing up gatherer-hunters on Bodmin Moor: Mesolithic and later flints from Butterstor and elsewhere on Bodmin Moor, Cornish Archaeology 31: 5–14.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. & Rose, P.. 1994. Bodmin Moor. An archaeological survey I: the human landscape to c. 1800. London: English Heritage. Archaeological report 24.Google Scholar
Mcglade, J. 1995. Archaeology and the ecodynamics of human modified landscapes, Antiquity 69: 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinig, D.W. 1979. The beholding eye – ten versions of the same scene, in Meinig, D.W. (ed.). The interpretation of ordinary landscapes – geographical essays: 33–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olwig, K.R. 1993. Sexual cosmology: nation and landscape at the conceptual interstices of nature and culture; or, what does landscape really mean, in Bender (ed.): 307–43.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1993. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Bender (ed.): 19–48.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape – places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1995. Rocks as resources: landscapes and power, Cornish Archaeology 34: 5–57.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. 1996. The powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor, World Archaeology 28: 161–76.Google Scholar