Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:27:27.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orientations and origins: a symbolic dimension to the long house in Neolithic Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Richard Bradley
Richard Bradley*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Whiteknights, PO Box 218, Reading RG6 6AA, England.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The long houses of the Linear Pottery Culture and its immediate successors are usually interpreted in functional terms, but they have certain anomalous features. This paper considers the processes by which they were built, lengthened, abandoned and replaced and suggests that they may have charted the development of the households who lived inside them. The buildings in Linear Pottery settlements were generally orientated towards the areas of the origin of the communities who lived there.

Keywords

long houseslong barrowsLinear Pottery Cultureancestors
Type
News & Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 287 , March 2001 , pp. 50 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2001

References

Birdwell-Pheasant, D. & Lawrenge-ZuñIga, D. (ed.). 1999. House life. Space, place and the family in Europe. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. & Hugh-Junes, S. (ed.). 1995. About the house. Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chllde, V.G. 1949. The origin of Neolithic culture in Northern Europe, Antiquity 32: 129–35.Google Scholar
Cotidart, A. 1998. Architecture et société. L’unité et la variance de la maison danubienne. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Fokkens, H. & Roymans, N. (ed.). 1991. Nederzettingen uit de bronstijd en de ijzertijd in de lage landen. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodermonderzoek.Google Scholar
Gerr1Ttson, F. 1999. The cultural biography of the Iron Age houses and the long-term transformation of settlement patterns in the southern Netherlands, in Fabech, C. & Rìngtved, J. (ed.), Settlement and landscape: 139—48. Arhus: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Hunter-Anderson, R. 1977. A theoretical approach to the study of house form, in Binford, L. (ed.), For theory building in archaeology: 287–315. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kind, C.-J. 1989. Ulm-Eggingen. Die Ausgrabungen 1982 bis 1985 in der bandkerarnischen Sidelung und der mittel-aitlichen Wüstung. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss.Google Scholar
Lüning, J. 1982. Siedlung und Siedlungschaft in band-keramischer und rössener Zeit, Offa 39: 9–33.Google Scholar
Lüning, J., Kloos, U. & Albert, S.. 1989. Westliche Nachbarn der bandkerarnischen Kultur: La Hoguette und Limburg, Germania 67: 355–420.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1981. Environmental adaptation and structural design in axially-pitched long houses from Neolithic Europe, World Archaeology 13: 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattheusser, E. 1991. Die geographische Ausrichtung band-keramischer Häuser, Studien zar Siedlungsarchäologie 1: 1–49.Google Scholar
Midgley, M. 1992. TRB Culture. The first farmers of the North European Plain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Modderman, P. 1988. The Linear Pottery Culture: diversity in unity, Berichten van de Bijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodermonderzoek 38: 63–139.Google Scholar
Mordant, D. 1997. Le complexe des Réaudins à Balloy: enceinte et nécropole monumentale, in Constantin, C., Mordant, D. & Simonin, D. (ed.), La Culture de Cerny: 449–79. Nemours: L’Association pour la Promotion de ia Recherche Archéologique en Ile-de-France.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 1997. Neolithische und chalkolithische Spondylus-Artefakte. Ammerkungen zu Verbreitung, Tauschgebiet und sozialer Funktion, in Becker, C. et al. (ed.), Beitrage zur prähistorischen Archaologie zwischen Nord- und Südosteuropa. Festschrift fur Bernhard Hänsel: 91–106. Espelkamp: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Simonin, D. 1997. Analyse spatiale d’un site d’habitat du Néolithique ancien à Échilleuse (Loiret), in Bocquet, A. (ed.), Espaces, physiques, espaces social dans l’analyse interne des sites du Néolithique à l’Age du Fer. 345—68. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Stäuble, H. & Lüning, J.. 1999. Phosphatanalysen in bandkerarnischen Häusern, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 29: 169–87.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, M. 1997. The age of clay. The social dynamics of house destruction, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16: 334–95.Google Scholar
Veit, U. 1996. Studien zum Problem der Siedlungbesattung im europäischen Neolithikum. Münster: Waxman.Google Scholar
Watereolk, H. 1959. Die bandkeramisches Siedlung von Geleen, Palaeohistoria 6–7: 123–67.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1996. Europe in the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar