Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:13:31.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nothing wrong with reasoned speculation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Alan Barnard*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK

Extract

In essence, Pargeter et al. argue that claims for the antiquity of modern San ‘cultures’ involve a misuse of analogical reasoning. In general, I agree. But, let me take issue with a few of the specifics they discuss, and argue instead that things may be more complicated than they seem.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, A. 1988. Structure and fluidity in Khoisan religious ideas. Journal of Religion in Africa 18 (3): 216–36.Google Scholar
Barnard, A. 1992. Hunters and herders of southern Africa: a comparative ethnography of the Khoisan peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, A. 2016. Language in prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. A linguist's view: Khoe-Kwadi speakers as the earliest food-producers of southern Africa. Southern African Humanities 20: 93132.Google Scholar
Pickrell, J.K., Patterson, N., Barbieri, C., Berthold, F., Gerlach, L., Güldemann, T., Kure, B., Mpolaka, S.W., Nakagawa, H., Naumann, C., Lipson, M., Loh, P.R., Lachance, J., Mountain, J., Bustamante, C.D., Berger, B., Tishkoff, S.A., Henn, B., Stoneking, M., Reich, D. & Pakendorf, B.. 2012. The genetic prehistory of southern Africa. Nature Communications 3: article 1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2140 Google Scholar
Witzel, E.J.M. 2012. The origins of the world's mythologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar