Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:39:36.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newborn twins from prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia: birth, death and personhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2015

Siân Halcrow ,
Nancy Tayles ,
Raelene Inglis  and
Charles Higham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Double infant burials in unusually high numbers occurred at Khok Phanom Di during a phase associated with immigration and some evidence of early agricultural practices. A study of their stratigraphic context and relative ages led to the interpretation that these were twins. Through an exploration of the medical and anthropological literature of twins, and in conjunction with their mortuary context, the authors conclude that these babies died of natural causes at, or soon after, birth.

Keywords

Southeast Asiaprehistorictwinsmortuary practicemortalitysocial identity
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 86 , Issue 333 , September 2012 , pp. 838 - 852
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>;.
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>;.

References

Alexander, G.R. & Salihu, H.M.. 2005. Perinatal outcomes of singleton and multiple births in the United States, 1995-98, in Blickstein, I. & Keith, L.G. (ed.) Multiple pregnancy: epidemiology, gestation and perinatal outcome: 3–10. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Angel, J.L. 1971. The people of Lerna: analysis of a prehistoric Aegean population, Princeton (NJ): American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Ball, H.L. & M, C..HILL. 1996. Re-evaluating ‘twin infanticide’. Current Anthropology 37: 856–63.Google Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Tayles, N., Higham, C.F.W., Macpherson, C. & Atkinson, T.C.. 2007. Shifting gender relations at Khok Phanom Di, Thailand: isotopic evidence from the skeletons. Current Anthropology 48: 301–14.Google Scholar
Boon, J.A. 1990. The paradox of gender: power and difference in Island Southeast Asia, in Atkinson, J.M. & Errington, S. (ed.) Power and difference: gender in Island Southeast Asia: 209–34. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boric, D. & Stefanovic, S.. 2004. Birth and death: infant burials from Vlasac and Lepenski Vir. Antiquity 78: 526–46.Google Scholar
Bortolus, R., Parazzini, F., Chatenoud, L., Benzi, G., Bianchi, M. & Marini, A.. 1999. The epidemiology of multiple births. Human Reproduction Update 5: 179–87.Google Scholar
Branum, A.M. & Schoendorf, K.C.. 2003. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 101: 570–74.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.M. 1998. Epidemiology of twinning. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 8: 126–34.Google Scholar
Chappel, T.J. H. 1974. The Yoruba cult of twins in historical perspective. Africa, Journal of the International African Institute 44: 250–65.Google Scholar
Corney, G. 1975. Mythology and customs associated with twins, in Macgillivray, I., Nylander, P.P.S. & Corney, G. (ed.) Human multiple reproduction: 1–15. London: W. B.|Saunders.Google Scholar
Crespo, L., Subirá, M.E. & Ruiz, J.. 2011. Twins in prehistory: the case from Olérdola (Barcelona, Spain; s. IV II BC). International Journal of Osteoarchaeology: 21: 751–56.Google Scholar
Errington, S. 1987. Incestuous twins and the house societies of insular Southeast Asia. Cultural Anthropology 2: 403–44.Google Scholar
Ford, C.S. 1945. A comparative study of human reproduction (Yale University Publications in Anthropology 32). New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, R. 2000. Archaeological biographies: realizing human lifecycles, -courses and -histories. World Archaeology 31: 325–28.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, W. 1973. Guilt and pollution in Sebei ‘mortuary rituals’. Ethos 1: 75–105.Google Scholar
Granzberg, G. 1973. Twin infanticide: a cross-cultural test of a materialistic explanation. Ethos 1: 405–12. doi: 10.1525/eth.1973.1.4.02a00030.Google Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. 2006. Subadult health and disease in late prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Otago.Google Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. & Tayles, N.. 2008. The bioarchaeological investigation of childhood and social age: problems and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15: 190–215.Google Scholar
Halcrow, S.E. 2011. The bioarchaeological investigation of children and childhood, in Agarwal, S.C. & Glencross, B. (ed.) Social bioarchaeology: 333–60. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halcrow, S.E., Tayles, N. & Livingstone, V.. 2008. Infant death in prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives 47: 371–404.Google Scholar
Hall, J. G. 2003. Twinning. The Lancet 362: 735–43.Google Scholar
Higham, C W, F.. & Bannanurag, R. (ed.). 1990. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 1: the excavation, chronology and human burials (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 50). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Higham, C.F.W. & Thosarat, R.. 1994. Khok Phanom Di: prehistoric adaptation to the world's richest habitat. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Higham, C.F.W. & Thosarat, R. 2004. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 7: summary and conclusions (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 62). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Jeanty, P. & Romero, R.. 1984. Obstetrical ultrasound. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kamp, K.A. 2001. Where have all the children gone? The archaeology of childhood. Journal of Archaeological Method & Theory 8: 1–34.Google Scholar
Kiely, J.L. 1990. The epidemiology of perinatal mortality in multiple births. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 66: 618–37.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, S.J., Jackson, R. & Croughan-Minihane, M.S.. 1996. Perinatal mortality in twins and singletons matched for gestational age at delivery at = 30 weeks. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 174: 66–71.Google Scholar
Layde, P.D., Erickson, J.D., Falek, A. & Mccarthy, B.J.. 1980. Congenital malformation in twins. American Journal of Human Genetics 32: 662–78.Google Scholar
Madrigal, L., Saenz, G., Chavez, M. & Dykes, D.. 2001. Frequency of twinning in two Costa Rican ethnic groups: an update. American Journal of Human Biology 13: 220–26.Google Scholar
Martin, J.A. & Park, M.M.. 1999. Trends in twin and triplet births: 1980–1997. National Vital Statistics Reports 47: 1–20.Google Scholar
Mason, G.M. 1991. The molluscan remains, in Higham, C.F.W. & Bannanurag, R. (ed.) The excavation of Khok Phanom Di. Volume 2: the biological remains (Part 1) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 48): 249–319. London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Matte, U., Leroux, M.G., Benichou, B., Moisan, J.P. & Guiugliani, R.. 1996. Study of possible increase in twinning rate at a small village in south Brazil. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma) 45: 431–37.Google Scholar
Mays, S.A. 1993. Infanticide in Roman Britain. Antiquity 67: 883–88.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, N., Helms, P.J. & Smyth, R.L. (ed.). 2003. Forfar and Arneil's textbook of pediatrics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Moorrees, C.A.F., Fanning, E.A. & Hunt, E.E.. 1963. Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 21: 205–13.Google Scholar
Murail, P., Maureille, B., Peresinotto, D. & Geus, F.. 2004. An infant cemetery of the Classic Kerma period (1750-1500 BC, Island of Sa¨ı, Sudan). Antiquity 78: 267–77.Google Scholar
Nylander, P.S.P. 1969. The frequency of twinning in a rural community in western Nigeria. Annals of Human Genetics 33: 41–44.Google Scholar
Pearson, M. 1998. Ancient DNA and the people of Khok Phanom Di. Unpublished Master of Arts dissertation, University of Otago.Google Scholar
Pector, E.A. 2002. Twin death and mourning worldwide: a review of the literature. Twin Research and Human Genetics 5: 196–205.Google Scholar
Schinzel, A.G.A.L., Smith, D.W. & Miller, J.R.. 1979. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. The Journal of Pediatrics 95: 921–30.Google Scholar
Shek, Y., Huang, A., Shek, Y. & Keith, L.. 1997. Secular rates of twinning in Asia: recent observations and review of literature. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 23: 407–13.Google Scholar
Spitz, L. & Kiely, E.M. 2003. Conjoined twins. Journal of the American Medical Association 298: 1307–10.Google Scholar
Stewart, E.A. 2000. Exploring twins: towards a social analysis of twinship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tayles, N. 1996. Anemia, genetic diseases, and malaria in prehistoric mainland Southeast Asia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101: 11–27.Google Scholar
Tayles, N. 1999. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 5: the people (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 61). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.B. 1996. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 4: subsistence and environment: the botanical remains (Part II) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 53). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
Vincent, B.A. 2004. The excavation of Khok Phanom Di: a prehistoric site in central Thailand. Volume 4: the material culture (Part II) (Research report of the Society of Antiquaries of London 70). London: Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar