Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:58:14.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neolithic transition and European population history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

Philippe Crombé
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Departement of Archaeology and Ancient History of Europe, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent, Belgium (Email: [email protected])
Mark Van Strydonck
Affiliation:
Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Jubelpark 1, B-1000 Brussel, Belgium (Email: [email protected])

Extract

In volume 295 of Antiquity M. Gkiasta et al. (2003) discussed the results of two sets of analysis carried out on a “new” database of radiocarbon dates: one for the whole of Europe examining the spread of the Neolithic, and one regional approach looking at the relation between Mesolithic and Neolithic dates. Although we are convinced of the potential of both approaches, we do have some major comments on the methodology.

First of all the analyses were conducted on a highly incomplete database. As the authors state on their p. 48, the analysed database currently includes over 2600 samples. Many of them, however, had already been collated in Gob’s Atlas of 14C dates (1990). Although the authors have included new dates, we do not believe that this has been done very systematically. For the Belgian territory, for example, virtually all the dates used in the article were those published by Gob – 16 Mesolithic dates and 30 Neolithic dates. The authors justify this by referring to the bad state of publication and public availability of radiocarbon dates in Europe. This certainly does not hold for the Belgian territory. In the last decade over a hundred new Mesolithic and Neolithic dates have been produced, the majority published in journals available world-wide such as Radiocarbon (Van Strydonck et al. 1995; 2001a), Antiquity (Crombé et al. 2002), Archaeometry (Cauwe et al. 2002) proceedings of the international congresses such as 14C and archaeology (Crombé et al. 1999) and The Mesolithic in Europe (Crombé 1999), and the IRPA- datelists (Van Strydonck et al. 2001b; Van Strydonck et al. 2002). The authors assert that these “shortcomings” to the database probably do not affect their conclusions. This is a rash and provocative statement, which minimises all recent progress in absolute dating of the European Mesolithic and Neolithic. We believe that for the Belgian situation a hundred new dates can make a difference. In recent years, for example, these new dates have allowed a thorough revision of Mesolithic chronology (Crombé 1999; Van Strydonck et al. 2001a) and a refinement of the (early) Neolithic chronology (Jadin & Cahen 2003). This will certainly also be the case for the other study-areas in Europe.

Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmore, P.J. 1999. Radiocarbon dating: avoiding errors by avoiding mixed samples, Antiquity, 73: 124130.Google Scholar
Cauwe, N., Orban, R. & Polet, C.. 2002. Belgium. Prehistoric cave burials. In Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T.F.G., Owen, D.C., Pike, A.W.G. & Hedges, R.E.M., eds., Radiocarbon Dates from the Oxford AMS System: Archaeometry Datelist 31, Archaeometry, 44(3): 810.Google Scholar
Crombé, P. 1999. Vers une nouvelle chronologie absolue pour le Mésolithique en Belgique. In Thévenin, A., ed., L’Europe des derniers chasseurs épipaléolithique et mésolithique. Peuplement et paléoenvironnement de l’Epipaléolithique et du Mésolithique, Actes du 5ème Congrès International UISPP, Grenoble, 18–23/09/1995: 189199.Google Scholar
Crombé, P., Groenendijk, H. & Van Strydonck, M.. 1999. Dating the Mesolithic of the Low Countries: some practical considerations. In Evin, J., Oberlin, C., Daugas, J.P. and Salles, J.F., eds., Actes du colloque “14C et Archéologie”, 1998. Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française 26 and Supplément de la Revue d’Archéométrie: 5763.Google Scholar
Crombé, P., Perdaen, Y. Sergant, J.-P. Van Roeyen, J., & Van Strydonck, M.. 2002. The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in the sandy lowlands of Belgium: new evidence, Antiquity, 76: 699706.Google Scholar
Jadin, I. & Cahen, D.. 2003 Datations radiocarbones et Rubané. Pour un mariage de raison. In Jadin, I. (ed), Trois petits tours et puis d’en vont … La fin de la présence danubienne en Moyenne Belguique, Eraul 109: 523581.Google Scholar
Gkiasta, M., Russell, T. Shennan, S. & Steele, J.. 2003. The Neolithic transition in Europe – the radiocarbon record revisited. Antiquity 77: 4562.Google Scholar
Gob, A. 1990. Chronologie du Mésolithique en Europe. Atlas des dates 14C. Liège: C.I.P.L.Google Scholar
Gronenborn, D. 1999. A Variation on a Basic Theme: The Transition to Farming in Southern Central Europe, Journal of World Prehistory, 13(2): 123210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanting, J.N. & Van Der Plicht, J.. 1993/4. 14C-Ams: pros and cons for archaeology, Praehistoria, 35/36: 112 Google Scholar
Stäuble, H. 1995. Radiocarbon dates of the Earliest Neolithic in Central Europe, Radiocarbon, 37(2): 227237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, M., Van Roeyen, J.-P. Minnaert, G. & Verbruggen, C.. 1995. Problems in Dating Stone-Age Settlements on Sandy Soils: the Hof ten Damme Site near Melsele, Belgium, Radiocarbon, 37(2): 291297.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M., Crombé, P. & Maes, A.. 2001a. The site of Verrebroek “Dok” and its contribution to the absolute dating of the Mesolithic in the Low Countries, Radiocarbon, 43(2): 9971005.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M., Landrie, M. Hendrix, V. Maes, A. Van Der Borg, K.M. De Jong, A.F. Alderliesten, C. & Keppens, E.. 2001b. Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Radiocarbon dates XVII, ed. Kik-Irpa, Brussels, 50.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M., Landrie, M. Boudin, M. Grootes, P.M.-J. Nadeau, M. Sparks, R. & Keppens, E.. 2002. Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage, Radiocarbon dates XVIII, ed. Kik-Irpa, 70.Google Scholar