Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-10T20:16:01.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Needfire Ritual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to give a brief survey of the Needfire ceremony and its variants as they occurred in various parts of Scotland. As the introductory example we take the case of a Morayshire farmer. ‘In the year 1850 a murrain decimated the herd of a farmer in the parish of Dallas. He proceeded at once with all ceremony to kindle the needfire. Then digging a pit in the ground he sacrificed an ox’ (1). This is fairly representative of the practice which was common all over Scotland. From time immemorial fires of different kinds have been kindled on certain days of the year. But besides these regularly recurring celebrations farmers resorted to fire rituals in seasons of distress above all when their cattle were attacked by epidemic disease, or, to ward off the devils of witchcraft. The general name by which they are known is needfire, Gaelic teine-éiginn, ‘churned’ or ‘forced fire’. It was by needfire that fire was originally produced at all fire festivals. Of the primitive ways of kindling fire the commonest was by the friction of wood, and two methods of producing friction in this way was clearly distinguished, the fire-drill and stick and groove or fire-plough. In its simplest form the fire-drill consists of two sticks, one of which is pointed and held upright with its point pressing on the other, which was laid flat on the ground; the upright stick, or drill proper, is twirled rapidly between the palms of the hands till the point bores a hole in the other stick and the continued friction generates first heat and then fire which is nursed into a flame by dry leaves or other suitable tinder. In the fire-plough a pointed stick is rubbed vigorously along a groove or depression in a piece of wood laid flat on the ground.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gordon Cumming, C.F., In the Hebrides, London, 1883, p. 194.Google Scholar
2. MacLagan, R. C., Folk Lore, London, 1898, Vol. IX, pp. 2801. A photograph facing p. 280 shows a piece of the wood last used to raise teine-éiginn in Scotland. The circumference of the stick is 13.5 inches and its length 18.75 inches.Google Scholar
3. McPherson, J. M., Primitive Beliefs in the North-East of Scotland, London, 1929, p. 29.Google Scholar
4. Martin, M., A Description of the Western Isles of Scotland, Ed., 1716, p. 113.Google Scholar
5. Banks, M., British Calendar Customs, Scotland, London, 1941, Vol. 2, p. 231.Google Scholar
6. Napier, J., Folk Lore ; or, Superstitious Beliefs in the West of Scotland within this Century, Paisley, 1879, pp. 824.Google Scholar
7. MacDiarmid, J., Trans. Gaelic Society of Inverness, Inverness, 1901–3, Vol. XXV, p. 128.Google Scholar
8. Ibid., p. 128.Google Scholar
9. Ramsay, J., Scotland and Scotsmen in the Eighteenth Century, Ed. Allardyce, A., 1888, Vol. 2, pp. 4423.Google Scholar
10. Robertson, C. M., Trans. Gaelic Society of Inverness, Inverness, 1904–7, Vol. XXVI, p. 265.Google Scholar
11. Shaw, L., History of the Province of Moray, Edinburgh, 1775, p. 30. This act of purification is met with in the rites connected with the caisean-uchd, i.e., the strip of skin from the breast of a sheep killed at Christmas and other sacred festivals. The skin is lit and the burning fumes are inhaled as a safeguard against evil influences during the year. Carmichael, A., Carmina Gadelica, Edinburgh, 1900, Vol. 2, p. 239.Google Scholar
12. Macdonald, J., Trans. Gaelic Society of Inverness, Inverness, 1893–4, Vol. XIX, p. 273. A similar custom is recorded for Buchan:—‘if a man had not cleared with the Druids for his last year’s dues he was neither to have a spark of the holy fire, nor were his friends permitted to let him take the benefit of theirs’. Pratt, J., Buchan, , Aberdeen, , 1858, p. 26.Google Scholar
13. Stuart, S., Presbytery Book of Strathbogie, Aberdeen, 1843, p. 51.Google Scholar
14. Ibid., p. 104.Google Scholar
15. Ibid., p. 105.Google Scholar
16. Ibid., pp. 11718.Google Scholar
17. Bell, T., Records of the Meeting and the Exercise of Alford, Aberdeen, 1897, p. 144.Google Scholar
18. McPherson, J. M., op. cit., p. 32.Google Scholar
19. Ramsay, J., op. cit., Vol. 2, p. 447.Google Scholar
20. Crammond, W., The Church and Priory of Urquhart, Elgin, 1899, p. 41.Google Scholar
21. Simpson, E. B., Folk Lore in Lowland Scotland, London, 1908, p. 27. The needfire with its associated sacrificial ritual was also considered a sovereign remedy against malignant diseases in human beings. A Highland example is the sacrifice of bulls at Loch Maree. Hector Mackenzie of Gairloch and others of his family were summoned before the Presbytery ‘for sacrificing a bull in ane heathenish manner (i.e. with the fire ritual) in the iland of St. Ruffus ... for the recovering of the health of Cirstane Mackenzie ... who was formerlie sicke’. Mackay, W., Records of the Presbyteries of Inverness and Dingwall, Edinburgh, 1896, p. 338.Google Scholar
22. Gregor, W., Notes on the Folk-Lore of the North-East of Scotland, London, 1881, p. 186.Google Scholar
23. Ibid., p. 186.Google Scholar
24. Ferguson, R. M., Rambles in the Far North, Paisley, 1884, p. 71.Google Scholar