Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:38:38.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

More than just pretty pictures: red-figure pottery production beyond Athens

Review products

StineSchierup & VictoriaSabetai (ed.). The regional production of red-figure pottery: Greece, Magna Graecia and Etruria (Gösta Enbom Monograph 4). 358 pages, numerous colour and b&w illustrations. 2014. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press; 978-87-7124-393-2 hardback £30.

T.H.Carpenter, K.M.Lynch & E.G.D.Robinson (ed.). The Italic people of ancient Apulia: new evidence from pottery for workshops, markets, and customs. xvi+353 pages, 106 b&w illustrations. 2014. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 978-1-107-04186-8 hardback £75 & $125.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

Edward Herring*
Affiliation:
College of Arts, Social Sciences, and Celtic Studies, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Republic of Ireland (Email: [email protected])

Extract

Red-figure pottery first achieved prominence in the modern world through antiquarianism and the collection of souvenirs on the Grand Tour. This fundamentally shaped the scholarship of this class of pottery. Vases were valued for their completeness, their iconography—scenes depicting Greek myth and literature being particularly prized—and their aesthetic qualities. Famous private collections were formed, many of which subsequently entered the world's great museums. Less value was placed upon the vessels as archaeological objects. The contexts in which they were found, their associations with other objects and their roles in ancient society were given little consideration. The pursuit of intact vases led to a focus on cemeteries, and many discoveries were, and indeed continue to be, the result of looting. Thus, most museum collections are dominated by vessels without proper provenance. Moreover, collections are skewed towards funerary and, to a lesser extent, sanctuary evidence, and away from material used in domestic contexts. The importance of iconography and aesthetics means that museums tend to display the most varied and beautiful vessels, ignoring much of the output of ancient workshops.

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Trendall, A.D. & Cambitoglou, A.. 1978. The red-figured vases of Apulia, 1. Early and Middle Apulian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. & Cambitoglou, A.. 1982. The red-figured vases of Apulia, 2. Late Apulian. Indexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. & Cambitoglou, A.. 1983. First supplement to the red-figured vases of Apulia (BICS Supplement 42). London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. & Cambitoglou, A.. 1992. Second supplement to the red-figured vases of Apulia, 1–3 (BICS Supplement 60). London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar