Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:14:40.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Middle Palaeolithic origin of music? Using cave-bear bone accumulations to assess the Divje Babe I bone ‘flute’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Francesco D'Errico ,
Paola Villa ,
Ana C. Pinto Llona  and
Rosa Ruiz Idarraga
Francesco D'Errico
Affiliation:
UMR 9933 du CNRS, Institut de Préhistoire et de Géologie du Quaternaire, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence, France. [email protected]
Paola Villa
Affiliation:
Université Bordeaux 1, UMR 9933 du CNRS, Institut de Préhistoire et de Géologie du Quaternaire, Avenue des Facultés, 33405 Talence, France. [email protected] University of Colorado Museum, Boulder CO 80309-0315, USA
Ana C. Pinto Llona
Affiliation:
Area de Prehistoria, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007 Asturias, Spain. [email protected]
Rosa Ruiz Idarraga
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Historicas, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The discovery of a perforated cave-bear femur from the Neanderthal levels at Divje Babe has been interpreted as the oldest musical instrument in Europe. Here we present the current discussion on the ‘flute’ and its implications for other similar bone finds from early prehistory.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 275 , March 1998 , pp. 65 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altuna., J. 1972. Fauna de mamíferos de los yacimientos prehistóricos de Guipúzcoa, Munibe 24: 1–464.Google Scholar
Altuna, J., Mariezkurrena, K., Armenuariz, A., Del Barrio, L. & ugalue, Tx. 1982. Carta Arqueólogica de Guipúzcoa, Munibe 34: 1–242.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. & Turner, A. 1992. Life and death of the Westbury Bears, Annates Zoologici Fennici 28: 139–49.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . 1997. Early Music, Science 276: 205.Google Scholar
Bahn, P. 1996. New developments in Pleistocene art, Evolutionary Anthropology 4: 204–15.Google Scholar
Baldéon, A. 1993. El Yacimiento de Lezetxiki (Guipézcoa, País Vasco). Los niveles musterienses, Munibe 45: 3—97.Google Scholar
Baud, Ch.A. 1986. Altérations osseuses post-mortem d’origine fongique ou bactérienne, in Duday, Ft. & Masset, CI. (ed.), Anthropologic Physique Et Archeologique: 135–44. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1992. Palaooart and archaeological myths, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 2: 27–57 Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1994. Art origins, Anthropos 89: 169–80.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1995. Concept-mediated marking in the Lower Palaeolithic, Current Anthropology 36: 605–16.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1996. A Mousterian flute? The Artefact 19: 105–6.Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G. 1997. The role of Pleistocene beads in documenting hominid cognition, Rock Art Research 14(1): 27–41.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1981. Bones, Ancient Men And Modern Myths. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. Rigaud, J.P. & sonneville-bordes, D.De 1972. Des buts, problèmes et limites de l’archéologie paléolithique, Quaternaria 16: 15–34.Google Scholar
Byers, A.M. 1994. Symboling and the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition: a theoretical and methodological critique, CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY 35: 369–99.Google Scholar
Buisson, D. 1991. Les flûtes paléolithiques d’lsturitz (Pyrénées atlantiques), Société Préhistorique Française 87: 420–33.Google Scholar
Cavallo, C.F. d’Errico & Giacobini, G. 1991. A taphonomic approach to the Grotta d’Ernesto Mesolithic site, Preistoria Alpina 27: 121–50.Google Scholar
Chase, P.G. 1990. Sifflets du Paléolithique movent?). Les implications d’un coprolithe de coyote actuel, Bulletin De La Socété Préhistorique Française 87: 165–7.Google Scholar
Chase, P.G. & Dibble, H.L. 1987. Middle Paleolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations, Fournal Of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 263–96.Google Scholar
Chase, P.G. 1992. Scientific archaeology and the origins of symbolism: a reply to Bednarik, CAMBRIDGE ARCHAEOLOGICAL JOURNAL 2: 43–51.Google Scholar
D’errico, F. 1991. Carnivore traces ormousterian skiffle?, Rock Art Research 8: 61–3.Google Scholar
D’errico, F. 1993. La vie sociale de l’art mobilier Paleolithique. Manipulation, transport, suspension des objets en os, bois de cervides, ivoire, Oxford Journal Of Archaeology 12(2): 145–74.Google Scholar
D’errico, F. & Villa, P. 1997. Holes and grooves: the contribution of microscopy and taphonomy to the problem of art origins, Journal Of Human Evolution 33: 1–31.Google Scholar
Davidson, I. 1991. The archaeology of language origins — a review, Antiquity 65: 39–48.Google Scholar
Davidson, I. & Noble, W. 1989. The archaeology of perception, Current Anthropology 30: 125–55.Google Scholar
Fink, B. 1996. Neanderthal Flute. Oldest Musical Instrument’S 4 Notes Matches 4 Of Do, Re, Mi Scale. Mnsicological Analysis. http://www.webster.sk.ca/greenwich/fl-compl.htmGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J.W. 1995. Bone surface modifications in zooarchaeology, Journal Of Archaeological Method And Theory 2(1): 7–68.Google Scholar
Gargett, R.h. 1996. Cave Bears And Modern Human Origins. Lanhan (MD): University Press of America.Google Scholar
Garrigues, B. 1997. Une flûte de 45,000 ans, Eurêka 15: 46.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. 1996. Le Paléolithique supérieur en Allemagne méridionale (1991-1995), in Otte, M. (ed.), Le Paléolithique Supérieur Européen. Bilan Quinquennal (1991-1996). 18. Forli: ERAUL 76.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1993. The cultural capacities of Neandertals: a review and re-evaluation, Fournal Of Human Evolution 24: 113–46.Google Scholar
Haynes, g. 1983. A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore long bones, Paleobiology 9: 164–72.Google Scholar
Hawkes, N. 1997. Neanderthal Man moves up the evolutionary scale, THE TIMES 5 April.Google Scholar
Huyge, D. 1990. Mousterian skiffle ? Note on a middle palaeolithic engraved bone from Schulen, Belgium, Rock Art Research 7(2): 125–32.Google Scholar
Jelinek, J. 1997. An unexpected spectacular find. Rock Art Research 14(1): 59–60.Google Scholar
Jodry, M.A. & Standford, D. 1992. Stewart’s Cattle Guard Site: an analysis of bison remains in a Folsom kill-butchery campsite, in Stanford, D. & Day, J. (ed.), ICe Age Hunters of The Rocky Mountains: 101–68. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Jodry, M.A., Kitching, J.M. 1980. On some fossil arthropoda from Limeworks, Makapansgat, Palaeontologia Africana 23: 63–8.Google Scholar
Kltching, J.M. 1963. Bone, Tooth And Horn Tools Of Palaeolithic Man. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kurten, B. 1955. Sex dimorphism ans size trends in the Cave Bear, Acta Zoologica Fennica 90: 1–47.Google Scholar
Kurten, B. 1958. Life and death of the Pleistocene cave bear: a study in paleoecology, Acta Zoologica Fennica 95: 32–86.Google Scholar
Kurten, B. 1976. The Cave Bear Story. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, B., Blackweh, B.A.B., Schwartc, H., Turk, I.& Blickstein, J.I. 1996. Dating a flautist? Using ESR (Electron Spin resonance) in the Mousterian cave deposits at Divje Babe I, Slovenia, Geological Society Of America Annual Meeting In Denver, Abstract P.207 Google Scholar
Llofis Llado, N. & Elosegui, J. 1954. Sobre las caracteristicas del relleno de la Sima de los Osos de Troskaeta-ko-kobea, (Ataun-Guipuzcoa). Munibe 6: 38–46.Google Scholar
Lyman, L.R. 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1976. Some implications of paleolithic symbolic evidence for the origin of language, Current Anthropology 17(2): 276–82.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1988. The Neanderthals and the human capacity for symbolic though: cognitive and problem-solving aspects of Mousterian symbol, in Yosef, O.Bar (ed.), L’Homme De Néandertal 5: 57–91. Liege: ERAUL.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1991. A reply to Davidson on Mania & Mania, Rock Art Research 8: 47–58.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1995. A middle Paleolithic symbolic composition from the Golan Heights: the earliest known depictive image, Current Anthropology 37(2): 356–65.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1907–10. Recherches Surrevolution Du Mousterian Dans Le Gisement De La Quina (Charente), Industrie Osseuse 1. Paris: Schleicher Freres.Google Scholar
MCBURNEY, C.B.M. 1969. The Haua Fteah (Cyrenaica) And The Stone Age Of The Southeast Mediterranean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. 1989. Major issues in the emergence of modern Humans Current Anthropology 30: 349–85.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. 1996. The Neanderthal Legacy. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
morlan, R. E. 1983. Spiral fractures on limb bones: which ones are artificial?, in LeMoine, G.M. & MacEachern, A.S. (ed.), Carnivores, Human Scavengers And Predators: A Question Of Bone Technology: 241–69. Calgary: University of Calgary Archeological Association.Google Scholar
Pérez, P.J., Gonzalez, O.T., Fraile, L.& Torres, T. 1986. Paleopathological study ofskeletal remains of ursids of the Pleistocene-Holocene from the Iberian Peninsula, Proceedings Of The Vi European Meeting Of The Paleopathology Association: 297–304.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. 1981. A bear in its lair, Natural History 90 (10): 64–70.Google Scholar
Sanchez Goñi, M. F., 1993. De La Taphonomie Pollinique A La Reconstitution De 1’Environnement: 1’Exemple De La Region Cantabrique. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 586.Google Scholar
Selvaggio, M.M. 1994. Evidence from carnivore tooth marks and stone-tool-butchery marks from scavenging by homi-nids at FLK Zinjanthropus Oldvai Gorge, Tanzania. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, New Jersey State University.Google Scholar
Slmek, j.f. 1992. Neanderthal cognition and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition, in Braur, G.& Smith, F.H. (ed.), Continuity Or Replacement. Controversy In Homo Sapiens Evolution: 231–45. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
j.D., Speth & johnson, G.A. 1976. Problems in the use of correlation for the investigation of tool kits and activity areas, in Cleland, C.E. (ed.), Cultural Change And Continuity: 3576. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stepanchuk, V.N. 1993. Prolom II, a Middle Paleolithic site in the Eastern Crimea with non-utilitarian bone artefacts, Proceedings Of The Prehistoric Society 59: 17–37.Google Scholar
Stiner, M.C. 1995. Honor Among Thieves. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stiner, M.C., Arsebuk, G.& Howell, f.C. 1996 Cave bears and paleolithic artifacts in Yarimburgaz Cave, Turkey: dissecting a Palimpsest, Geoarchaeojogy 11(4): 279–327.Google Scholar
Stordeur, D. 1979. Les Aiguilles à Chas Au Paléolithique. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Stringer, C. & Gamble, C. 1993. In Search Of The Neanderthals. New York (NY): Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, J.A. 1970. Spotted hyena: crusher, gnawer, digester and collector of bones, Nature 227: 1110–13.Google Scholar
Taborin, Y. 1990. Les prémices de la parure, in Farizy, C.(ed.), Paléolithique Moyen Récent Et Paléolithique Supéricur Ancien En Europe: 224–335. Nemours: Musée de Préhistoire d’He de France.Google Scholar
Torres, t. 1988. Osos (Mammalia, Curnivora, Ursidae) Del Pleistoceno De La Península Ibérica. Madrid: Instituto Geólogico y Minero de España.Google Scholar
Torres, T., Cobo, R.& Salazar, A., 1991. La población de oso de las cavernas [Ursus Spelaeus Parvilatipedis N. Ssp.) de Troskaeta’ko kobea (Ataun, Gipuzkoa), Munibe 43: 3–85.Google Scholar
Torres, T, Grandal, A. & Cobo, R. 1990. Comparacion entre aspectos tafonomicos de dos yacimientos de oso de las cavernas {URSUSSPELAEUSRos.-Hein): Cueva Eiros (Triacastela-Lugo) y Troskaeta’ko-kobea (Ataun-Guipuzcoa), Reunion De Tafonomia Yfosilizacion, Madrid Universidad Complutense Csic: 363–8.Google Scholar
Turk, I. (ed.) 1997. Mousterian Bone Flute And Other Finds From Divje Babe I Cave Site In Slovenia. Ljubljana: Institut za Arhaeologijo.Google Scholar
Turk, I., Dirjec, j. & Kavur, B. 1995. Ali so v sloveniji nasli najstarejse glasbilo v europi? [The oldest musical instrument in Europe discovered in Slovenia?], Razprave Iv. Razreda Sazu (Ljubliana) 36: 287–93.Google Scholar
Turk, I. 1996.The Oldest Musical Instrument In Europe Discovered In Slovenia? http://www.zrc-sazu.si/www/izaypiscal.htmlGoogle Scholar
Turk, I. 1997.A-t-on trouve en Slovénie le plus vieil instrument de musique d’Europe? L’Anthropologic 101(3): 531–40.Google Scholar
Villa, P. 1982. Conjoinable pieces and site formation processes, American Antiquity 47: 276–90.Google Scholar
Villa, P. & Courtin, j. (1983). The interpretation of stratified sites: a view from underground, Journal Of Archeological Science 10: 267–81.Google Scholar
Wetzel, R. & Bosinski, G. 1969. Die Bocksteinschmiede Im Lonetal. Stuttgart: Veröffentichungen des Staatlichen Amtes für Denkmalpflege.Google Scholar
White, R. 1992. Beyond art: toward an understanding of the origins of material representations in Europe, Annual Review Of Anthropology 21: 537–64.Google Scholar
Wilford, J.N. 1996. Playing of flute may have graced Neanderthal fire, New York Times 24 October: 1–7.Google Scholar
wong, K. 1997. Neanderthal notes, Scientific American September: 28–30.Google Scholar