Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:40:20.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Madrasien’: on the trail of a terminology in Indian prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2022

Shanti Pappu Open the ORCID record for Shanti Pappu [Opens in a new window]  and
Kumar Akhilesh
Shanti Pappu*
Affiliation:
Sharma Centre for Heritage Education, Sholinganallore, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Visiting Professor, Humanities and Social Science, Krea University, Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, India
Kumar Akhilesh
Affiliation:
Sharma Centre for Heritage Education, Sholinganallore, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological nomenclature influences the classification of cultural phases, objects and related behavioural interpretations. The term ‘Madrasien’, synonymous with the Acheulian, was a key concept in early studies of Indian prehistory, encompassing notions of geographical/administrative boundaries, tool types, cultural identities and migrations. Madrasien was coined in 1931 by the Austrian prehistorian Oswald Menghin and established in South Asian prehistory by V.D. Krishnaswami. Here, the authors trace the evolution of the term, situating it within the wider discourses in Indian prehistory and examining its role in shaping ideas on South Asian Palaeolithic nomenclatures. The Madrasien was gradually replaced by the current medley of African, European and Southeast Asian terminologies.

Keywords

South AsiaPalaeolithicOswald MenghinV.D. Krishnaswamihistory of archaeologyarchaeological cultures
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 96 , Issue 390 , December 2022 , pp. 1443 - 1459
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, D.P. & Ghosh, A. (ed.). 1973. Radiocarbon and Indian archaeology. Bombay: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.]Google Scholar
Akhilesh, K. et al. 2018. Early Middle Palaeolithic culture in India around 385–172 ka reframes Out of Africa models. Nature 554: 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allchin, B. 1963. The Indian Stone Age sequence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 93: 210–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2844243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 2015. Chinese Palaeolithic challenges for interpretations of Palaeolithic archaeology. Anthropologie 53: 77–92.Google Scholar
Cammiade, L.A. & Burkitt, M.C.. 1930. Fresh light on the Stone Age of southeast India. Antiquity 4: 327–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00004919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, D.K. 2009. India: an archaeological history. Palaeolithic beginnings to early historic foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198064121.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1929. The most ancient East: the oriental prelude to European prehistory. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1935. Changing methods and aims in prehistory: presidential address for 1935. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00022155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1937. Symposium on Early Man, Philadelphia. Antiquity 11: 351–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00116795Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1956. Piecing together the past: the interpretation of archaeological data. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D. 1939. Early Man: as depicted by leading authorities at the International Symposium, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, March 1937. Edited by MacCurdy, G.G.. London: J.B. Lippincott. Antiquity Book Review 13: 124–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00014484Google Scholar
Coggin-Brown, J. 1917. Catalogue raisonńe of the prehistoric antiquities in the Indian Museum at Calcutta. Simla: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
Corvinus, G. 1983. A survey of the Pravara River system in western Maharashtra, India. Volume 2: the excavations of the Acheulian site of Chirki-on-Pravara, India. Tubingen: Institute for Urgeschichte.Google Scholar
Das-Gupta, H.C. 1923. Indian pre-history. Journal of the Department of Science, University of Calcutta 5: 1–29.Google Scholar
Das-Gupta, H.C. 1933. Bibliography of prehistoric Indian antiquities. Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, New Series 27: 1–91.Google Scholar
Datta, A., Ghosh, A.K. & Margabandhu, C. (ed.). 1995. India at the dawn of history: essays in memory of Sh. V.D. Krishnaswami. New Delhi: Agam Kala Prakashan.Google Scholar
Dennell, R.W. 1990. Progressive gradualism, imperialism and academic fashion: Lower Palaeolithic archaeology in the 20th century. Antiquity 64: 549–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00078431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foote, R.B., with King, W.. 1866. On the occurrence of stone implements from various parts of Madras and North Arcot districts. Madras Journal of Literature and Science (3rd Series) 2: 1–35.Google Scholar
Foote, R.B., with King, W.. 1916. The Foote collection of Indian prehistoric and protohistoric antiquities: notes on their ages and distribution. Madras: Government Museum.Google Scholar
Gaillard, C. & Mishra, S.. 2001. The Lower Palaeolithic in South Asia, in Sémah, F., Falguères, C., Grimaund-Hervé, D. & Sémah, A.-M. (ed.) Origin of settlements and chronology of the Paleolithic cultures in South-east Asia: 73–92. Semenanjuang and Paris: Colloque International de la Fondation Singer Polignac.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. 1979. Aspects of periodization and terminology, in Agrawal, D.P. & Chakrabarti, D.K. (ed.) Essays in Indian protohistory : 3–6. Delhi: B.R. Publishing.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. & Stevenson, A.. 2013. World archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: a characterization. Oxford: Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17db2mzGoogle Scholar
von Koenigswald, G.H.R. 1936. Early Palaeolithic stone implements from Java. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum Singapore 1: 52–60.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. & Gollán, J.A. Pérez. 2002. Religion, politics, and prehistory: reassessing the lingering legacy of Oswald Menghin. Current Anthropology 43: 561–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/341530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaswami, V.D. 1938a. Environmental and cultural changes of the prehistoric man near Madras. Journal of Madras Geographical Association 13: 58–90.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, V.D. 1938b. Prehistoric man round Madras. Madras [Chennai]: Thompson & Co.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, V.D. 1947. Stone Age India. Ancient India 3: 11–57.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, V.D. 1953. Progress in prehistory. Ancient India 9: 53–79.Google Scholar
Krishnaswami, V.D. & Rajan, K.V. Soundar. 1951. The lithic tool-industries of the Singrauli basin, district Mirzapur. Ancient India 7: 40–65.Google Scholar
Logan, A.C. 1906. Old chipped stones of India founded on the collection in the Calcutta Museum. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co.Google Scholar
MacCurdy, G.G. (ed.) 1937. Early Man: as depicted by leading authorities at the international symposium, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, March 1937. London: J.B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
Mader, B. 2020. Die personelle struktur der prähistorischen kommission in der NS-Zeit, in Modl, D. & Peitler, K. (ed.) Archäologie in Österreich 1938–1945: Beiträge zum internationalen symposium vom 27. bis 29. April 2015 am Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz (Forschungen zur geschichtlichen Landeskunde der Steiermark 79, Schild von Steier 8): 382–95. Graz: Universalmuseum Joanneum.Google Scholar
Malik, S.C. 1968. Indian civilization: the formative period: a study of archaeology as anthropology. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Menghin, O. 1925. Die Tumbakultur am unteren Kongo und der westafrikanische Kulturkreis. Anthropos 20: 516–57.Google Scholar
Menghin, O. 1931. Weltgeschichte der Steinzeit. Wien: Anton Schroll & Co.Google Scholar
Menghin, O. 1937. Origin and development of the early Paleolithic cultures, in MacCurdy, G.G. (ed.) Early Man: as depicted by leading authorities at the international symposium: 303–14. London: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Meyer, W.S., Burn, R., Cotton, J.S. & Risley, H.H. (ed.). 1909. The Imperial Gazetteer of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. 2021. Oldest Acheulian from India? Youngest Acheulian from India? Available at: https://sheilamishra.wordpress.com (accessed 10 January 2021).Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. 1962. Problems of terminology in Indian prehistory. Eastern Anthropologist 15: 113–24.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. 1971. Evolution of Palaeolithic cultures in India, in Bordes, F. (ed.) Origin of man: 115–20. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. 1990. Stone Age India: an ecological perspective. Man and Environment 14: 17–64.Google Scholar
Misra, V.N. & Mate, M.S. (ed.). 1965. Indian prehistory: 1964. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Mitra, P. 1927. Prehistoric India: its place in the world's cultures. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.Google Scholar
Monnier, G. 2006. The Lower/Middle Paleolithic periodization in Western Europe: an evaluation. Current Anthropology 47: 709–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/506280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, T. & Evans, C.. 2008. Histories of archaeology: a reader in the history of archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199550074.001.0001Google Scholar
Murty, M.L.K. 1969. Blade and burin industries near Renigunta on the south-east coast of India. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34: 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00013852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paddayya, K. 1984. Stone Age India, in Muller-Karp, H. (ed.) Neue Forscheungen zur Altsteinsei: 345–403. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Paddayya, K. 2016. Revitalizing Indian archaeology: further theoretical essays. New Delhi: Aryan Books.Google Scholar
Pappu, R.S. 2001. Acheulian culture in peninsular India: an ecological perspective. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld.Google Scholar
Pappu, S. 2007. Changing trends in the study of a Palaeolithic site in India: a century of research at Attirampakkam, in Petraglia, M.D. & Allchin, B. (ed.) The evolution and history of human populations in South Asia: inter-disciplinary studies in archaeology, biological anthropology, linguistics and genetics: 121–37. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappu, S. et al. 2011. Early Pleistocene presence of Acheulian hominins in south India. Science 331: 1596–99. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, T.T. 1939. Stratigraphic and typologic sequence of the Madras palaeolithic industries, in de Terra, H. & Paterson, T.T. (ed.) Studies on the Ice Age in India and associated human cultures: 327–30. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
Petraglia, M.D. & Potts, R.. 2004. The Old World Paleolithic and the development of a national collection (Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 48). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K. 2011. Thoughts in circles: Kulturkreislehre as a hidden paradigm in past and present archaeological interpretations, in Roberts, B.W. & Linden, M. Vander (ed.) Investigating archaeological cultures: material culture, variability, and transmission: 41–59. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6970-5_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, N. & Riede, F.. 2019. House of cards: cultural taxonomy and the study of the European Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity 93: 1350–58. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, F.J., Cammiade, L.A. & Burkitt, M.C.. 1932. Climatic changes in south-east India during early Palaeolithic times. Geological Magazine 69: 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001675680009720XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankalia, H.D. 1963. Prehistory and protohistory of India and Pakistan. Bombay: University of Bombay.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H.D. 1964. Stone Age tools: their techniques, names and probable functions. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H.D. 1979. Indian archaeology today. Delhi: Ajanta Publications.Google Scholar
Sauer, F. & Riede, F.. 2019. A critical reassessment of cultural taxonomies in the Central European Late Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Method Theory 26: 155–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9368-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seton-Karr, H.W. 1909. Some recent Indian Palaeolithic implements. Man 9: 137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2840270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, J.J. 2013. Stone tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: a guide. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soundara Rajan, K.V. 1970–1971. V.D. Krishnaswami (18–1–1905/15–7–1970). Purattatva 4: 1–4.Google Scholar
Storey, A.A. & Jones, T.L.. 2011. Diffusionism in archaeological theory: the good, the bad and the ugly, in Jones, T.L., Storey, A.A., Matisoo-Smith, E. & Ramirez-Aliaga, J.M. (ed.) Polynesians in America: pre-Columbian contacts with the New World: 7–24. Lanham (MD): Altamira.Google Scholar
Subbarao, B. 1958. The personality of India (M.S. University Archaeological Series 3). Baroda: M.S. University.Google Scholar
de Terra, H. 1937. The Siwaliks of India and early man, in MacCurdy, G.G. (ed.) Early Man: as depicted by leading authorities at the international symposium: 257–68. London: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
de Terra, H. & Paterson, T.T.. 1939. Studies on the Ice Age in India and associated human cultures. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
de Terra, H. & Teilhard de Chardin, P.. 1936. Observations on the Upper Siwalik formation and later Pleistocene deposits in India. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 76: 791–822.Google Scholar
de Terra, H., Teilhard de Chardin, P. & Paterson, T.T. 1936. Joint geological and prehistoric studies of the Late Cenozoic in India. Science 83: 233–36. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.83.2149.233.bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurston, E. 1914. The Madras Presidency with Mysore, Coorg and the associated states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/201032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 2008. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urban, O. 1997. “Er war der Mann zwischen den Fronten”: Oswald Menghin und das Urgeschichtliche Institut der Universität Wien während der Nazizeit. Archaeologia Austriaca 80: 1–24.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. 1938. Early Man: as depicted by leading authorities at the international symposium, the Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia, March 1937. Edited by G.G. McCurdy. London: J.B. Lippincott. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 4: 352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0079497X00027225Google Scholar