Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T19:39:21.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lausitz Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

V. Gordon Childe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On the continent as in Britain the later phases of the Bronze Age are marked by the spread of large cremation cemeteries generally termed urnfields. One of the several groups of urnfield cultures in Central Europe occupies such a pre-eminent position that it may even claim to be the parent of all the rest. It is known as the Lausitz or Lusatian culture after the area where it is most richly and typically represented—a strip in eastern Saxony and western Silesia.

Here the bodies were cremated in ustrina close to the cemetery, and the ashes, carefully purified from cinders, were enclosed in clay ossuaries or cinerary urns. The ossuary was closed with an inverted dish, but in all early burials a hole was carefully bored in its walls. It is supposed that this aperture was intended to allow the ghost to escape, and hence it has been called a ghost-hole (Seelenloch). The urn, with its cover, was buried in the ground with many accessory vases, presumably containing provisions for the journey into the next world. A barrow might be raised over the tomb, but in all cases the graves form regular cemeteries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 2 , Issue 5 , March 1928 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Seger, H. ‘Lausitzer–Kultur’ in Ebert’s Reallexikon;cf. also Červinka ‘ Böhmenund Mähren ’ ibid; Buchtela inGoogle Scholar Jahrbuch der k.k. Zeniral–Kommission,Vienna,1904 and Mannus, 19, (1927) pp.26ff.Google Scholar

2 Kiekebusch, A. Die bronzezeitliches Dorf Buch bei Berlin.Google Scholar

3 von Richthofen in Mannus, Erganzungsbande iv, pp. 140 ff.

4 Heurtley, A. Antiquaries Journal,1927,pp.44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Naue, Die Bronzezeit in Oberbayevn; Kraft, Die Kultur der Bronzezeit in Süddeutschland.

6 Reallexikon, sv Hötting..

7 Crawford,Antiquaries Journal,1922,pp.27ff.Google Scholar

8 Mannus,Ergänzungsband v, pp. 50ff.

9 Scarborough.Siiddeutschland.But here there is clearly a cross–current from Central Germany as Kendrick (Druids, p. 39) points out.