Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:46:28.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of a European radiocarbon calibration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

J. R. Pilcher  and
M. G. L. Baillie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clark (1975) gave a clear account to ANTIQUITY readers of the current state of the radiocarbon calibration problem. It is now 19 years since De Vries demonstrated that one of the primary assumptions of the radiocarbon dating method was in error. Since then more than 1,200 measurements have been made on samples of known-age wood and over 70 papers published on this topic (reviewed by Bermingham and Renfrew, 1972 and by Clark, 1975). In spite of this activity, at the recent radiocarbon conference in Los Angeles and La Jolla no international agreement could be reached on a single calibration or correction that could be used to convert radiocarbon measurements to calendar ages. The problems of calibration have undermined the confidence of many European archaeologists in radiocarbon dating-one hears remarks such as ‘one can’t take the dates seriously, after all they are only radiocarbon dates’. Workers attempting to reconcile calibrated radiocarbon dates with historically based chronologies have found that the agreements do not live up to their expectations based on the quoted standard deviations of the dates. In the short term the results we present here may further convince the archaeologist that radiocarbon dates will not solve his chronological problems. However, we hope to demonstrate that radiocarbon dating is ultimately capable of sufficient accuracy to be fully compatible with historical chronologies

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 52 , Issue 206 , November 1978 , pp. 217 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apsimon, A. M. 1976. Ballynagilly and the beginning and end of the Irish Neolithic, in (ed.), Laet, S. J. De, Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe, 15-30.Google Scholar
Baillie, M. G. L. 1973- A recently developed Irish tree- ring chronology, Tree-Ring Bulletin, 33, 15-28.Google Scholar
Baillie, M. G. L. 1977. Ships’ timbers from the Dublin excavations, Proceedings of the Greenwich Conference, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Bermingham, A. Renfrew., C. 1972. The history of C14 calibration, Antiquity, XLVI, 151-3.Google Scholar
Clark, R. M. 1975. A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates, Antiquity, XLIX, 251-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, P. E. Ferguson, C. W. Long, A., And Wallick, E. I.. 1974. Dendrochronologic calibration of the radiocarbon time-scale, American Antiquity, XXXIX, 350-66.Google Scholar
Mckerrell, H. 1975- Correction procedures for C14 dates, in (ed.), Watkins, T., Radiocarbon calibration and prehistory (Edinburgh), 47-100.Google Scholar
Muller, R. A. 1977. Radioisotope dating with a cyclotron, Science, 196, 489-94.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W. Pilcher, J. R. Baillie, M. G. L., And Hillam, J.. 1977. Absolute radiocarbon dating using a low altitude tree-ring calibration, Nature, 270, 25-8.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J. R. 1973. Tree-ring research in Ireland, Tree-Ring Bulletin, 33, 1-5.Google Scholar
Pilcher, J. R. Hillam, J. Baillie, M. G. L. Pearson, G. W.. 1977. A long sub-fossil oak tree-ring chronology from the north of Ireland, New Phytol., LXXIX, 713-29.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. Baillie, M. G. L. Hillam, J. Pilcher, J. R. Pearson, G. W.. 1972. Dendrochronological work in progress in Belfast: the prospect for an Irish post-glacial tree-ring sequence, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on radiocarbon dating, New Zealand, A92-A96.Google Scholar
Suess, H. 1970. Bristlecone-pine calibration of the radiocarbon time-scale 5200 bc to the present, in (ed.), Olsson, I. U., Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology (Stockholm), 303-12.Google Scholar
Suess, H. 1976. A calibration curve for radiocarbon dates, Antiquity, L, 61-3.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H. T. 1971. Working with radiocarbon dates, Proc. Prehist. Soc., XXXVII, 15-33.Google Scholar
Wendland, W. M. Donley., D. L. 1971. Radiocarbon- calendar age relationship, Earth and Planetry Science Letters, II, 135-39.Google Scholar