No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Human intent and cultural lineages: a response to Bentley & O'Brien
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2024
Extract
I thank Bentley and O'Brien (2024) for their cogent review of issues associated with inheritance and intention in cultural evolution. Intent is, of course, present in cultural process and that begs the question as to when and how we concern ourselves with it as a factor in cultural evolution (Rosenberg 2022). Intent underlies our understanding of both micro- and macro-scale processes of cultural evolution. Lamarckian microevolutionary process depends on decision-makers choosing whether or not to accept and sometimes alter cultural traits (Boyd & Richerson 1985). Zeder (2009, 2018) points out that even long-term change may be affected by conscious infrastructural investments that alter capacity for socioeconomic production and, subsequently, canalise later developments.
- Type
- Debate Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd
References
Bentley, R.A. & O'Brien, M.J.. 2024. Cultural evolution as inheritance, not intentions. Antiquity 98. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, R.L. 2009. Macroevolutionary theory and archaeology: is there a big picture?, in Prentiss, A.M., Kuijt, I. & Chatters, J.C. (ed.) Macroevolution in human prehistory: evolutionary theory and processual archaeology: 275–96. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0682-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, J.L. & Alsgaard, A.. 2024. Surf and turf: the role of intensification and surplus production in the development of social complexity in coastal versus terrestrial habitats. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2023.101566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P.J.. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. & Wylie, A.. 2016. Evidential reasoning in archaeology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1985. Unfinished synthesis: biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195036336.001.0001Google Scholar
Garvey, R. 2021. Patagonian prehistory: human ecology and cultural evolution in the Land of Giants. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book100127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S. 1997. Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 307–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01098-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolodny, O., Creanza, N. & Feldman, M.W.. 2015. Evolution in leaps: the punctuated accumulation and loss of cultural innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112: E6762–69. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520492112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laue, C.L. & Wright, A.H.. 2019. Landscape revolutions for cultural evolution: integrating advanced fitness landscapes into the study of cultural change, in Prentiss, A.M. (ed.) Handbook of evolutionary research in archaeology: 127–48. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11117-5_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentiss, A.M. et al. 2023a. Emergence of persistent institutionalized inequality at the Bridge River site, British Columbia: the roles of managerial mutualism and coercion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 378. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentiss, A.M. et al. 2023b. Evolution of the Okvik/Old Bering Sea culture of the Bering Strait as a major transition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 376: 20210415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0415Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. 2022. The dynamics of cultural evolution: the central role of purposive behaviors. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04863-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, C.S. 2009. Testing the morphogenesist model of primary state formation: the Zapotec case, in Prentiss, A.M., Kuijt, I. & Chatters, J.C. (ed.) Macroevolution in human prehistory: evolutionary theory and processual archaeology: 133–56. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0682-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidiella, B., Carrignon, S., Bentley, R.A., O'Brien, M.J. & Valverde, S.. 2022. A cultural evolutionary theory that explains both gradual and punctuated change. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 19. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.2.97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeder, M.A. 2009. Evolutionary biology and the emergence of agriculture: the value of co-opted models of evolution in the study of culture change, in Prentiss, A.M., Kuijt, I. & Chatters, J.C. (ed.) Macroevolution in human prehistory: evolutionary theory and processual archaeology: 133–56. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Zeder, M.A. 2018. Why evolutionary biology needs anthropology: evaluating core assumptions of the extended evolutionary synthesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 27: 267–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21747CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed