Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:19:32.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Historicism, chronology and straw men: situating Hawkes' ‘Ladder of inference’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Evans
Christopher Evans*
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Christopher Hawkes was one of the leading British archaeological theorists in the middle decades of this century. Much underrated, Hawkes is reassessed here in the broader development of processual archaeology in Britain.

Keywords

inferenceHawkesNew ArchaeologyBritish archaeologyhistoricism
Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 276 , June 1998 , pp. 398 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J. 1994. Fragments from Antiquity: An archaeology of social life in Britain 2900–1200 BC. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. 1995. Some challenges in contemporary archaeology. Archaeology in Britain Conference Address. Oxford: Oxbow Lecture 2.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1968. Archaeological perspectives, in Binford, S.R. & Binford, L.R. (ed.), Perspectives in archaeology: 5–32. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1967. Rethinking archaeology. New York (NY): Random House.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1940. Prehistoric communities of the British Isles. London: W.R. Chambers.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1956. Piecing together the past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1958. The prehistory of European society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D 1947. Archaeology and society. Revised 2nd edition. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D 1957. Archaeology and society. Revised 3rd edition. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Daniel, G.E. 1951. The chronological framework of prehistoric barbarian Europe, Man 52 (Article 64): 34–7.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1988. Monuments and analogy: the interpretation of causewayed enclosures, in Burgess, C et al. (ed.), Enclosures and defences in the Neolithic of Western Europe: 47–73. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 403.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1989. Archaeology and modern times: Bersu’s Woodbury 1938 & 1939, Antiquity 63: 436–50.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1995. Archaeology against the state: Roots of internationalism, in Ucko, P. (ed.), Theory in archaeology: a world perspective: 312–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1998. Constructing houses and building context: Bersu’s Manx roundhouse campaign, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 64.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Forthcoming. Christopher Hawkes, in Murray, T. (ed.), Archaeologists: a biographical encyclopaedia.Google Scholar
Harding, D.W. 1994. Charles Francis Christopher Hawkes 1905–1992, Proceedings of the British Academy 84: 323–44.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1946, British prehistoric archaeology: recent aims, methods and results, Nature 157: 717–20.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1948. Archaeology and the history of Europe: an inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 28 Nov. 1947. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1951. British prehistory half-way through the century, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 17: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World, American Anthropologist 56: 155–68.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1957. Archaeology as science: purpose and pitfalls, Archaeological News Letter 6: 93–100.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1966. British prehistory: the invasion hypothesis. Antiquity 40: 297–8.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1972. Europe and England: fact and fog, Helinium 12: 105–16.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1973. ‘Cumulative Celticity’ in Pre-Roman Britain, , Etudes Celtiques 13: 607–28.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C 1989. Christopher Hawkes (appended ‘Retrospect’), in Daniel, G. & Chippindale, C. (ed.), The Postmasters: 46–60. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. & C.F.C. 1947. Prehistoric Britain. Revised 2nd edition. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology: 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986 Reading the past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Picgott, S. 1959. Approaches to archaeology. London: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C. 1987. Social theory and archaeology. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A. 1955. The limits of inference, The Archaeological News Letter 6: 3–7.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Rethinking the Neolithic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, D. 1991. Hawkeseye: the early life of Christopher Hawkes. Stroud: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar