Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T22:08:54.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaeological Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Willy Kitchen
Willy Kitchen*
Affiliation:
Research School of Archaeology & Archaeological Science, University of Sheffield, West Court, 2 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, England, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Ruffled feathers’ seem to be part of the World Archaeological Congress. Here we present two different assessments of the forthcoming World Archaelogical Congress in Cape Town in January–one from an observer, Willy Kitchen, and one from the WAC Secretary, Julian Thomas, which set out some of the ideals and current realities of this highly political enterprise.

Type
Reports
Information
Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 278 , December 1998 , pp. 747 - 750
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascherson, N. 1998. Comment. India’s real doomsday machine is not at a nuclear test site in Punjab. It’s hidden in a pile of stones which was once a mosque, The Observer (London) 17 May 1998: 28.Google Scholar
Colley, S. 1995. What happened at WAC-3?, Antiquity 69: 15–18.Google Scholar
Golson, J. 1996. What went wrong with WAC 3 and an attempt to understand why, WAC News 4(1): 3–9 (originally published in Australian Archaeology 41: 48–54).Google Scholar
Hassan, F. 1995a. Truth, morality and politics in archaeology: the WAC-3 Ayodhya case study, Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, London. (Spring): 81–6.Google Scholar
Hassan, F. 1995b. The World Archaeological Congress in India: politicizing the past, Antiquity, 69: 874–7.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C. 1997. Problems with an EAA Code of Ethics, The European Archaeologist 6: 10–11.Google Scholar
Kitchen, W. 1998a. Some suggestions for a more open and accessible WAC. Pre-circulated paper to WAC Inter-Congress, Brač, Croatia. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~jmg29B/croatia/kitchen.htm Google Scholar
Kitchen, W. 1998b. The World Archaeological Congress: Indian summer or nuclear winter?, Assemblage 4. http://www.shef.ac.uk/~assem/ Google Scholar
Kitchen, W. Forthcoming, positon paper on WAC statutes.Google Scholar
Mandal, D. 1993. Ayodhya: archaeology after demolition. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Muralidharan, S. 1994a. Questions of ethics: World Archaeological Congress, Delhi, Frontline 16 December 1994: 99–101.Google Scholar
Muralidharan, S. 1994b. Deepening discord: tensions at the World Archaeological Congress, Frontline 30 December 1994: 119–21.Google Scholar
Navlakha, G. 1994. Recovering, uncovering or forfeiting the past? Economic and Political Weekly 19 November 1994: 2961–3.Google Scholar
Ronayne, M. 1995. WAC-3 — involvement and identities, WAC 3 Focus, WAC News 3(1): i-ii.Google Scholar
Ronayne, M. 1998. Towards an ethical understanding of archaeological practices. Pre-circulated paper to WAC Inter-Congress, Brač, Croatia. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~jmg296/croatia/ronayne.htm Google Scholar
Sawday, J. 1995. Site of debate, Times Higher Education Supplement 13 January 1995: 16–17.Google Scholar
Shrimali, K.M. 1998. Ayodhya archaeology: from imbroglio to resolution. Pre-circulated paper to WAC Inter-Congress, Brae, Croatia. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~jmg296/croatia/shrimali.htm Google Scholar
Tierney, M. 1995. WAC-3 and the role of archaeologists as intellectuals, WAC 3 Focus, WAC News 3(1): ii–iii.Google Scholar
Tierney, M. 1998. Treasures buried by layers of hate, Times Higher Education Supplement 12 June 1998.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. 1987. Academic feedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological Congress. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar