Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:20:49.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The forced repatriation of cultural properties to Tasmania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Tim Murray  and
Jim Allen
Tim Murray
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia
Jim Allen
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recent court case in Australia changes the established frames under which research archaeologists, parks administrators and Tasmanian Aborigines deal with the prehistoric archaeology of the island.

Type
Reports
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 266 , December 1995 , pp. 871 - 874
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. 1995. A short history of the Tasmanian affair, Australian Archaeology (December) 41: 43–8.Google Scholar
Moreli, V. 1995. Who owns the past?, Science 268: 1424–6.Google Scholar
Murray, T. 1993. The childhood of William Lanne: contact archaeology and Aboriginality in Tasmania, Antiquity 67: 504–19. Google Scholar
Murray, T. In press. A forced repatriation of cultural properties to Tasmania, in Chanock, M. & Simpson, C. (ed.), Law and cultural heritage, a special issue of Law in Context. Google Scholar
Porch, N. & Allen, J. 1995. Tasmania: archaeological and palaeo-ecological perspectives, in Allen, J. & O‘Connell, J.F. (ed.), Transitions: Pleistocene to Holocene in Australia & Papua New Guinea, Antiquity (special number) 69: 714–32.Google Scholar