Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:43:38.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Floor sequences in Neolithic Makri, Greece: micromorphology reveals cycles of renovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Panagiotis Karkanas  and
Nikos Efstratiou
Panagiotis Karkanas
Affiliation:
Ephoreia of Palaeoanthropology-Speleology of Southern Greece, Arditou 34b, 11636 Athens, Greece
Nikos Efstratiou
Affiliation:
Department of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dating and examination of plaster floor sequences by micromorphology at a tell site in Greece shows when they were made and how they were composed. While numerous informal floor surfaces using recycled rubbish were put in place, as and when, by the occupants, formal floors rich in plaster seem to have been re-laid at regular intervals in reflection of a communal decision – even if the actual floors followed a recipe determined by each household. The authors rightly champion the potential of the technique as a possible indicator of social change at the household and settlement level.

Keywords

GreeceNeolithictellhouseholdcommunityplaster floordomestic waste
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 83 , Issue 322 , December 2009 , pp. 955 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammerman, A. J., Efstratiou, N., Ntinou, M., Pavlopoulos, K., Gabrielli, R., Thomas, K. & Mannino, M. A.. 2008. Finding the early Neolithic in Aegean Thrace: the use of cores. Antiquity 315: 139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, N. 2000. Life rhythms and floor sequences: excavating time in rural Rajastan and Neolithic Çatalhöyük. World Archaeology 31: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, P., Fedorroff, N., Jongerius, A., Stoops, G. & Tursina, T.. 1985. Handbook for soil thin section description. Wolverhampton: Waine Research Publishers.Google Scholar
Canti, M. G. 1998. The micromorphological identification of faecal spherulites from archaeological and modern materials. Journal of Archaeological Science 25: 435–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courty, M. A. 2001. Microfacies analysis assisting archaeological stratigraphy, in Goldberg, P., Holliday, V. T. & Ferring, C. R. (ed.) Earth Sciences and Archaeology: 205-39. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efstratiou, N. & Kallindzi, N.. 1996. Αρχαιoλoγικ ές ´ερευνες στη Μάκρη –Éβρoυ. Εκτιμήσεις και πρoβλήματα. ΑΕΜΘ 10: 881–917.Google Scholar
Efstratiou, N., Fumanal, M. P., Ferrer, C., Kotsos, D. Urem, Curci, A., Tagliacozzo, A., Stratouli, G., Valamoti, S. M., Ntinou, M., Madella, M. & Skourtopoulou, K.. 1998. Excavations at the Neolithic settlement of Makri, Thrace, Greece (1988-1996) - A preliminary report. SAGVNTVM (PLAV) 31: 11–61.Google Scholar
Efstratiou, N. & Ntinou, M.. 2002. Eνα εργαστήριo κατασκευής λίθινων αξινών στη Νεoλιθική Mάκρη. ΑΕΜΘ 16: 1–9.Google Scholar
Gé, T., Courty, M. A., Matthews, W. & Wattez, J.. 1993. Sedimentary formation processes of occupation surfaces, in Goldberg, P., Nash, D. T. & Petraglia, M. D. (ed.) Formation processes in archaeological context: 149–63. Madison (WI): Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goren, Y. & Goldberg, P.. 1991. Petrographic thin sections and the development of Neolithic plaster production in Northern Israel. Journal of Field Archaeology 18: 131–8.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. & Cessford, C.. 2004. Daily practice and social memory at Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity 69: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkanas, P. 2006. Late Neolithic household activities in marginal areas: the micromorphological evidence from the Kouveleiki caves, Peloponnese, Greece. Journal of Archaeological Science 33: 1628–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karkanas, P. 2007. Identification of lime plaster in prehistory using petrographic methods: a review and reconsideration of the data on the basis of experimental and case studies. Geoarchaeology 22: 775–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. B. & Hughes, J. J.. 2002. Binder microstructure in lime mortars: implications for the interpretation on analysis results. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 35: 257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macphail, R. I. & Crowther, J.. 2007. Soil micromorphology, chemistry and magnetic susceptibility at Huizui (Yiluo region, Henan province, northern China), with special focus on a typical Yangshao floor sequence. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 27: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macphail, R. I. & Goldberg, P.. 1995. Recent advances in micromorphological interpretations of soils and sediments from archaeological sites, in Barham, A. J. & Macphail, R. I. (ed.) Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management: 1–24. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College.Google Scholar
Macphail, R. I., Linderholm, J. & Karlsson, N.. 2006. Scanian pithouses; interpreting fills of grubenhäuser: examples from England and Sweden, in Engelmark, R. & Linderholm, J. (ed.) Proceedings from the VIII Nordic conference on the application of scientific methods in archaeology, Umeå 2001 (Archaeology and Environment 21): 119–27. Umeå: Umeå Universtiet.Google Scholar
Macphail, R. I., Crowther, J. & Cruise, J.. 2007. Micromorphology and post-Roman town research: the examples of London and Magdeburg, in Henning, J. (ed.) Post-Roman towns, trade and settlement in Europe and Byzantium. Volume 1: The heirs of the Roman West: 303–17. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. 1995. Micromorphological characterization and interpretation of occupation deposits and microstratigraphic sequences at Abu Salabikh, Southern Iraq, in Barham, A. J. & Macphail, R. I. (ed.) Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management: 41–74. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. 2005. Life-cycle and life-course of buildings, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Çatalhöyük perspectives. Reports from the 1995-1999 seasons by members of the Çatalhöyük team: 125–49. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs; London: British School at Ankara.Google Scholar
Matthews, W. & Postgate, J. N., with Paney, S., Charles, M. P. & Dobney, K.. 1994. The imprint of living in an early Mesopotamian city: questions and answers, in Luff, R. & Rowley-Conway, P. (ed.) Whither environmental archaeology? (Oxbow Monograph 38): 171–212. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Matthews, W., French, C., Lawrence, T. & Cutler, D. F.. 1996. Multiple surfaces: the micromorphology, in Hodder, I. (ed.) On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993-95: 301–42. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Research; London: British Institute at Archaeology of Ankara.Google Scholar
Matthews, W., French, C. A. I., Lawrence, T., Cutler, D. F. & Jones, M. K.. 1997. Microstratigraphic traces of site formation processes and human activities. World Archaeology 29: 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milek, K. 2005. Soil micromorphology, in Sharples, N. M. (ed.) A Norse farmstead in the Outer Hebrides: excavations at mound 3, Bornais, South Uist: 98–104. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Milek, K. & French, C.. 2007. Soils and sediments in the settlement and harbour at Kaupang, in Skre, D. (ed.) Kaupang in Skiringssal: 321–60. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A.M.T. 2000. The building and layout of Abu Hureyra 2, in Moore, A.M.T., Hillman, G. C. & Legge, A. J. (ed.) Village on the Euphrates: from foraging to farming at Abu Hureyra: 261–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ntinou, M. 2002. La paleovegetación en el norte de Grecia desde el Tardiglaciar hasta el Antlántico. Formaciones vegetales, recursos y usos (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1038). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in History and Society 26: 126–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 1994. Dung, dirt and deposits: site formation under conditions of near-perfect preservation at Qasr Ibrim, Egyptian Nubia, in Luff, R. & Rowley-Conwy, P. (ed.) Whither environmental archaeology? (Oxbow Monograph 38): 25–32. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. 2005. The concept(s) of culture, in Spiegel, G. M. (ed.) Practicing history. New directions in historical writing after the linguistic turn: 76–97. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spiegel, G. M. 2005. Practicing history. New directions in historical writing after the linguistic turn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stoops, G. 2003. Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin sections. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Valamoti, S. M. 2004. Plants and people in Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age northern Greece: an archaeobotanical investigation (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1258). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Weninger, B., Jöris, O. & Danzeglocke, U.. 2008. CalPal-2007. Cologne Radiocarbon Calibration & Palaeoclimate Research Package. Available at http://www.calpal.de/Google Scholar