Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:19:02.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at Pirincay in the Paute Valley of southern Ecuador, 1985–1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Karen Olsen Bruhns ,
James H. Burton  and
George R. Miller
Karen Olsen Bruhns
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco CA 94132, USA
James H. Burton
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Archaeological Chemistry, Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706, USA
George R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Hayward CA 94542, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Formative in the northern Andes

The northern Andean regions, encompassing northernmost Peru, all of Ecuador and the southern provinces of Colombia, remain archaeologically very poorly known. Although the past 30 years have witnessed an increasing number of archaeological projects in coastal zones, especially the Santa Elena Peninsula, work in the highlands outside of the greater Quito commute zone has lagged sadly behind. Southern Ecuador, in particular, has had little investigation since earlier this century when first Max Uhle, then Donald Collier, John Murra and, finally, Wendell Bennett, demonstrated the existence of ‘Formative’ cultures in Ecuador through their investigations at sites along the Tomebamba and Paute rivers of Azuay province and at Cerro Narrío, just to the north in the Cañar Valley (Uhle 1922; Collier & Murra 1943; Bennett 1946; FIGURE 1).

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 64 , Issue 243 , June 1990 , pp. 221 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The preliminary investigations at Pirincay, on the Atlantic watershed of the southern Ecuadorian Andes, were briefly described in the March 1987 ANTIQUITY. Since that article, much more of the site has been excavated, and analyses of excavated materials have clearly delineated its role in transandean trade during the last two millennia BC

References

Bennett, W.C. 1946. Excavations in the Cuenca Region, Ecuador. New Haven: Yale University Press. Yale Publications in Anthropology 35.Google Scholar
Bruhns, K.O. 1989. Intercambio entre la costa y la sierra en el Formativo Tardío: nuevas evidencias del Azuay, in Bouchard, J-F. & Guinea, M. (ed.): flelaciones interculfurales en el area ecuatorial del Pácifico durante la epoca precolombina: 57–74. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. International series 503.Google Scholar
Bruhns, K.O. 1988-1989. Prehispanic weaving and spinning implements from southern Ecuador, The Textile Museum Journal 27–28: 70–77.Google Scholar
Bruhns, K.O. In press. Los talleres de cristal de roca de Pirincay, Provincia del Azuay y el intercambio entre la sierra y la costa en el Formativo Tardxío, Misce-lanea Antropolbgica Ecuatoriana.Google Scholar
Bushnell, G.H.S. 1946. An archaeological collection from Macas, on the eastern slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes., Man 46 (2): 363–93.Google Scholar
Collier, D. & Murra., J.C. 1943. Survey and excavations in southern Ecuador. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History. Anthropological series 35.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. & Bruhns., K.O. 1987. The Paute Valley project in Ecuador, 1984, Antiquity 61: 50–6.Google Scholar
Gilmore, R.M. 1948. Fauna and ethnozoology of South America, in Steward, J.S. (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians: 345–464. Washington (D.C.): Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology. Bulletin 143 (6).Google Scholar
Gomis, D. 1989. La alfareria de Chaullabamba. Cuenca: Catedral Salvaje, Revista Cultural del editorial El Conejo, circula con ‘El Mercurio’: 24: 4–5. (11 June 1989).Google Scholar
Harner, M.J. 1973. The Jivaro: people of the sacred waterfalls. Garden City (NY): Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Lynch, T.F. & Polloc, S.. 1981. La arqueologýa de la Cueva Negra de Chobshi, Miscelanea Antropólogica Ecuatoriana 1: 92–119.Google Scholar
Miller, G.R. & GILL, A.. 1990. Zooarchaeology at Pirincay, Ecuador, Journal of Field Archaeology 17 (1): 48–68.Google Scholar
Porras Garces, P.I. 1987. Investigaciones Arqueoiógicas a las Faidas del Sangay: Tradición Upano. Quito: Centro de Investigaciones Arqueológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.Google Scholar
Rostocker, A.G. 1988. An archaeological collection from eastern Ecuador. Unpublished M.A. thesis in anthropology, San Francisco State University. CA.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. 1971. Geologie von Ecuador. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger. Beiträge zur regionalen Geologie der Erde. Band 11.Google Scholar
Shady, R. & Rosas, H.. 1979. El complejo Bagua y el sistema de establecimientos durante el Formativo en la sierra norte del Perú, Ñawpa Pacha 17: 109–42.Google Scholar
Uhle, M. 1922. Influencias mayas en el alto Ecuador. Quito: Academia Nacional de Historia. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Historia 4: 205–40; 5: 1–3.Google Scholar