Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:48:41.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethno-history and ‘reverse chronology’ at Ti'innik, a Palestinian village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ghada Ziadeh
Ghada Ziadeh*
Affiliation:
2752 Middleton Avenue Apartment 31E, Durham NC 27705, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological attention in Palestine, as the Holy Land, has focused on research related to the biblical story. The overlooked Ottoman period offers a special opportunity to look back from contemporary knowledge into the archaeological past, explored here in a single village settlement whose full story spans five millennia.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 69 , Issue 266 , December 1995 , pp. 999 - 1008
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahkit, M. & Al-Hmud, N. 1989a. Dafter Mufassal, Nahiyat Marj Bani ‘Amir wa Twabi’ha wa Lwahiqha Allati Kanat fi Tasarruf al-Amir Turabay Sanat 945 AH/ 1538AD. Amman: Jordan University Press.Google Scholar
Bahkit, M. & Al-hmud, N. 1989b. The detailed Defter of al-Lajjûn, Tapu Defteri No: 181, 1005 AH/1596 AD. Amman: Jordan University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Mazar, A. 1982. Israeli archaeology, World Archaeology 13 (3): 310–25.Google Scholar
Ben-Tor, A. et al. 1978. The first season of excavations at Tel Yone’am, 1977, Israel Exploration Journal 29: 65–83.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1972 An archaeological perspective. New York (NY): Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J.L. 1822. Travels in Syria and the Holy Land. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Conder, C. & Kitchener, H. 1881. Survey of western Palestine 1, Sheets 1-4. Reprint. Jerusalem: Kedem Publishing.Google Scholar
Conder, C. & Kitchkner, H. 1882. Memoirs of the survey of western Palestine 2. London: Palestine Exploration Fund.Google Scholar
Doumani, B. 1986. The Islamic court records of Palestine, Birzeit Research Review 2: 3–29.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1971. A new Taanach tablet, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 204: 14–30.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1972. Taanach in Jezreel: a review. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1978. Taanach, in Avi-Yonah, M. & Stern, E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of archaeological excavations in the Holy Land. 4: 1138–47. Jerusalem: Massada Press.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1983a. Texts and archaeology at Tell Ta’annek, Berytus 31: 57–66.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1983b. Draft report on survey of east slope of Tell Ta’annek. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Glock, A. 1987. Prolegomena to archaeological theory, Birzeit Research Review 4: 4–39.Google Scholar
Gould, R. 1980. Living archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guérin, V. 1875. Description géographique, historique et archéologique de la Palestine 2. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Hillers, D.R. 1964. An alphabetic cuneiform tablet from Taanach (TT 433), Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 173: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987. The historical approach in archaeology, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeology as long-term history: 1–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hrozny, F. 1904. Die Keilschrift Texte von Ta’annek (mit Autographien), in Sellin 1904: 113–22.Google Scholar
Hrozny, F. 1905. In Sellin 1905: 36–41.Google Scholar
Hütteroth, W. 1975. The pattern of settlement in Palestine in the sixteenth century: geographical research on Turkish Defter-i Muffassal,in Ma’oz, M. (ed.), Studies on Palestine during the Ottoman Period: 3–10. Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew University and Ben-Zvi.Google Scholar
Hütteroth, W. & Abdulfattah, K. 1977. Historical geography of Palestine, Jordan and southern Syria in the 16th century. Erlangen: Erlangener Geographische Arbeiten5.Google Scholar
Johns, J. et al. 1989. The Paris Project: preliminary report upon the 1986 and 1988 seasons, Levant 21: 63–96. Unpublished. From wheel-thrown to hand-made pottery: an interim discussion of middle Islamic hand-made geometrically painted wares in Greater Syria.Google Scholar
Koepel, R. 1930. Palaestina: die Landschaft in Karten und Bildern. Tübingen: J.C. Mohr (Paul Siebeck)..Google Scholar
Kramer, C. 1982. Village ethnoarchaeology: rural Iran in archaeological perspective. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lapp, P. 1964. The 1963 excavation at Ta’annek, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 173: 2–32.Google Scholar
Lapp, P. 1967. The 1966 excavation at Ta’annek, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 185: 1–39.Google Scholar
Lapp, P. 1969. The 1968 excavation at Ta’annek, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 195: 1–49.Google Scholar
Pringle, D. 1981. The medieval pottery of Palestine and Transjordan (AD 636-1500): an introduction, gazetteer and bibliography, Medieval Ceramics 5: 45–60.Google Scholar
Pringle, D. 1986. The Red Tower. London: British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem. Monograph series I.Google Scholar
Rast, W. 1978. Taanach I: Studies in the Iron Age pottery. Cambridge (MA): American Schools of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. (ed.). 1843. Researches in Palestine: communications received from Rev. Eli Smith and Rev. Wolcoll. Bibliotheca Sacra 9–88.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. 1874. Biblical researches in Palestine, journal of Travels in the Year 1852. 11th edition. London: Crockery & Brewster.Google Scholar
Sandys, G. 1673. Travels, containing an history of the original and present state of the Turkish Empire. 7th edition. London: John Williams Jr. Google Scholar
Sauer, J. 1673. Heshbon pottery 1971, a preliminary report on the pottery from the 1971 excavations at Tell Hisban. Berrien Springs (MI): Andrews University Press.Google Scholar
Sellin, E. 1904. Tell Ta’annek. Vienna: Denkschrift der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissen schaffen in Wien. Philosophisch-Histoische Klasse 50.Google Scholar
Sellin, E. 1905. Eine Nachlese auf dem Tell Ta’annek in Palaestina. Vienna: Denkschrift der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Philosophisch-Histoische Klasse 52.Google Scholar
South, S. 1977. Method and theory in historical archaeology. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tristram, H.B. 1880 (1976). Esdraelon and Nazareth, in Wilson, C. (ed.), The land of Galilee & the north: 25–48. Jerusalem: Ariel Publishing House.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J. 1979. Archaeological ethnography in western Iran. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, A. 1989 Plant remains, Ti–innik. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, M.G. 1984 Site formaion in context. Unpublishod AM thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St Louis (MO):Google Scholar
Ziadeh, M.G. 1991 Change and continuity in a Palestinian village. Unpublishod AM thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge..Google Scholar
Ziadeh, M.G. 1995. Ottoman ceramics from Ti’innik, Palestine, Levant 227: 209–45.Google Scholar