Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:23:57.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishing the Chinese archaeological school: Su Bingqi and contemporary Chinese archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Wang Tao
Wang Tao*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, England. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most of what is heard in the West of Chinese archaeology is about the physical stuff — the astonishing string of major finds; some, like soldiers from the Terracotta Army of the First Emperor's tumulus, have been exhibited outside China. All archaeological material is excavated, described and explained by reference to some frame of ideas. This essay on the thinking of a leading Chinese archaeologist of our day, Su Bingqi, is accompanied by an article of his in translation.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 271 , March 1997 , pp. 31 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhimin, An. 1993. Lun lumu Bohai de shiqian wenhua - jian ping'quxi‘ guiuditili [On the prehistoric cultures around Ilio Bolliti Seti: also a comment on the theory of the ‘divisions and series’], Kaogu 1993(7): 609–15.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1968. The archaeology of ancient China. (Revised and enlarged edition.) New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1080. The archaeology of ancient China. 4th edition. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, L. Von. 1993. On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology, Antiquity 67: 839–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malina, J. & Vasicek, Z.. 1990. Archaeology yesterday and today: The development of archaeology in the sciences and humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su. 1965. Guanyu Yangshao wenhua de ruogan wenli (A few problems concerning the Yangshao culture], Kaogu xuehao 1965(1); cf. Su 1984:157-89. Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su (with Weizhang, Yin). 1981. Guanyu kaoguxue wenhua de quxi leixing wenti [On the problem of regions, series and types of archaeological cultures], Wenwu 1981(5); cf. Su 1984: 225-34.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1984. Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanfi [Selection of archaeological writings by Su Bingqi). Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1986. Liaoxiguwenhuaguchengguguo: shilun dangqian kaogu gongzuo zhongdian he da keti [The early cultures, early cities and early states in Liaoxi: a discussion on the important topics and focuses in current archaeology], Liaoliai wenwu xuekan 1986(1); cf. Su 1994: 76-9.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1987a. Xiangzheng Zhonghua de Liaoning zhongria wenhua shiji [The important cultural relics symbolizing the /.hough ua found in Liaoning], Liaoning huabao 1987(1); cf. Su 1994: 91-3.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1987b. Biange de shidai, biange de xueke [Reforms of our times and our studies], Kaoguxue wenhua Iunji [I]; cf. Sn 1994: 202-1.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1987c. Xiang jianli Zhongguo xuepai de mubiao pnndeng [Climbing towards the goal of establishment of the Chi neso school], Qingzhu Zhongguo shehui kexueyuan jianyuan shizhounian yuannei tongxun dekan; cf. Su 1994: 209.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1987d. Gei qingnianren de hua [A few wards for the young generation], Wenwu tiandi 1987(4); cf. Su 1994: 210 19.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1988. Zhonghua wenming de xin shuguang [The new dawn of Chinese civilization], Dongnan wenhua 1988(5); cf. Su 1984: 80-87.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1990. Wenhua yu wenming [Culture and civilization], Liaoliui wenwu xuekan 1990(1); cf. Su 1994: 94-9.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1991a. Chongjian Zhongguo gushi de yuangu shidai [Reconstructing the early periods of ancient Chinese history], Sfiixuesftj yanjiu 1991(3)’, cf. Su 1994: 104-13.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1991b. Guanyu chongjian Zhongguo shiqianshi de sikao [Thoughts on reconstructing the prehistory of China], Kaogu 1991(12); cf. Su 1994: 114-23.Google Scholar
Bingqi, Su 1994. Huaren – long de chuanren – zhongguoren: kaogu xungen ji [Hua people – descendants of the dragon – Chinese: an archaeological seeking after roots]. Shenyang: Liaoning daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xusheng, Xu. 1985. Zhongguo gushi de chuanshuo shidai [The legendary times in early Chinese history], Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
Weichao, Yu & Zhongpei, Zhang. 1984. Bianhouji [Postscript], with English translation, in Su (1984): 306–38.Google Scholar
Hui, Zhao. 1993. Guanyu kaoguxue wenhua he dui kaoguxue wenhua de yanjiu [On concepts of archaeological culture and studies of archaeological culture], Kaogu 1993(7); 620–26.Google Scholar
Yanjiusuo, Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogu. 1991. Zhongguo kaoguxue zhong tan shisi niandai shuju Ji 1965-1991 [Radiocarbon dates in Chinese archaeology 1965-1991]. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe. Archaeology Monographs II-28.Google Scholar