Barson, T., Batchelor, D. Berkeley, K. Freedman, C. Gale, M. Horlock, M. Montagu, J. Moszynska, A. Wilson, A. Wilson, S. & Withers, R.. 2000. 100 Artists A-Z, in Blazwick, I. & Wilson, S. (ed.), Tate Modern the handbook: 112–233. London: Tate Gallery Publishing.Google Scholar

Bradley, R. 1993. Altering the earth. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar

Brown, N. & Glazebrook, J.. 2000. Research and archaeology: A framework of the Eastern Counties 2: Research agenda and strategy. East Anglian Archaeology.Google Scholar

Coles, A. 1999. The epic archaeological digs of Mark Dion, in Coles, & Dion, (ed.): 25–33.Google Scholar

Coles, A. & Dion, M. (ed.). 1999. Mark Dion archaeology. London: Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar

Department of the Environment. 1990. PPGI6: Archaeology and planning. Planning Policy Guidance Circular.Google Scholar

Department of the Environment. 1994. PPG15: Planning and the Historic Environment. Planning Policy Guidance Circular.Google Scholar

English Heritage. 1991. Exploring our past: Strategies for the archaeology of England. London: English Heritage. Occasional paper 8.Google Scholar

Fontana, E. 1999. Loot, in Coles, & Dion, (ed.): 46–57.Google Scholar

James, S.T. & Millet, M. (ed.). In press. Britons and Romans: advancing an archaeological agenda. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar

Olivier, A. 1996 Frameworks for our past. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar

Prehistoric Society. 1988. Saving our prehistoric heritage. A report by the Prehistoric Society. London: Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar

Prehistoric Society. 1999. Research Frameworks for the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Britain and Ireland. London: Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar

Renfrew, A.C. 1999. It may be art, but is it archaeology ? Science as art and art as science, in Coles, & Dion, (ed.): 12–23.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, R. 2000. Art in 1900. Twilight or Dawn?, in Rosenblum et al. (ed.): 27–53.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, R., Stevens, M. & Dumas, A. (ed.). 2000. 1900 Art at the Crossroads. New York (NY): Abrams.Google Scholar

Sheldon, H. 1978. The 1972–4 excavations: their contribution to Southwark’s history, in Bird, J. Graham, A.H. Sheldon, H. & Towsend, P. (ed.), Southwark excavations 1972–4: 11–49. London/Guildford: London & Middlesex Archaeological Society/Surrey Archaeological Society.Google Scholar

Serota, N. 1996. Experience or interpretation. The dilemma museums of modern Art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Stevens, M. 2000. The exposition universelle: ‘This vast competition of effort, realisation and victories’, in Rosenblum, et al. (ed.): 55–71.Google Scholar

Tilley, C., Hamilton, S. & Bender, B.. 2000. Art and the representation of the past, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6 (1): 33–62.Google Scholar

Turner, D.J. 1987. Archaeology of Surrey, 1066–1540, in Bird, J. & Bird, D.G. (ed.), The Archaeology of Surrey to 1540: 223–61. Guildford: Surrey Archaeological Society.Google Scholar

Williams, J. & Brown, N.. 1999. An Archaeological Research Framework for the Greater Thames Estuary. Essex County Council.Google Scholar