Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:58:35.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The death of trance: recent perspectives on San ethnographies and rock arts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2013

Anne Solomon
Anne Solomon*
Affiliation:
*Independent researcher, UK (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The argument that shamanism is the key that unlocks the hidden meaning of rock art continues to provoke debate over three decades after it was first proposed. In a recent article in Antiquity (86: 696–706), David Lewis-Williams and David Pearce defend the argument that nineteenth-century ethnographies provide evidence for a trance dance and shamanic healing that are vital to understanding southern African rock art. In this reply, Anne Solomon challenges the claim that the ethnographic evidence describes shamanism and trance healing and argues that elision of southern San (/Xam) and Kalahari San practices in a single narrative has obscured important differences. The author suggests that there is no evidence that dances or trance states were connected with healing in /Xam society. These confusions, it is argued, undermine key aspects of the shamanistic interpretation of rock art.

Keywords

southern AfricaSan/Xamshamanismhealingtrance dancerock art
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 87 , Issue 338 , December 2013 , pp. 1208 - 1213
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arbousset, T. & Daumas, F.. 1846. Narrative of an exploratory tour to the north-east of the colony of the Cape of Good Hope. Cape Town: Robertson.Google Scholar
Biesele, M. 1975. Folklore and rituals of the !Kung hunter-gatherers. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Biesele, M. 1993. Women like meat: the folklore and foraging ideology of the Kalahari Ju/'hoan. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Biesele, M. 2011. Research politics and rock art interpretation in Africa: perspectives for the Lower Pecos. American Indian Rock Art 37: 135–44.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, M. & Naude, D.. 2010 [1999]. Mahure, sacred healer of the Khwe: Khwe texts on health and healing, magic and death. Part 1 (Khoisan Forum 12). Cologne: Institut für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, M.In press. A century of the specimens of Bushman folklore-a hundred years of linguistic neglect, in Deacon, P. & Skotnes, J. (ed.) The courage of //Kabbo (Proceedings of the conference ‘The courage of //Kabbo’, University of Cape Town, 17–20 August 2011). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, H.J. 1975. Elements of !ko Bushmen religious beliefs. Anthropos 70: 17–41.Google Scholar
Hoff, A. 2007. Medicine experts of the /Xam San: the !kwa !ka !gi:ten who controlled the rain and water (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 19). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Katz, R. 1982. Boiling energy: community healing among the Kalahari !Kung. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, R. & Biesele, M.. 1986. !Kung healing: the symbolism of sex roles and culture change, in Biesele, M. with Gordon, R. & Lee, R.B. (ed.) The past and present of !Kung ethnography: critical reflections and symbolic perspectives. Essays in honour of Lorna Marshall: 195–230. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. 1980. Ethnography and iconography: aspects of southern San thought and art. Man NS 15: 467–82.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. 1981. Believing and seeing: symbolic meanings in southern San rock paintings. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. 1987. A dream of eland: an unexplored component of San shamanism and rock art. World Archaeology 19: 165–77.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. 2000. Stories that float from afar. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. & Pearce, D.. 2012. The southern San and the trance dance: a pivotal debate in the interpretation of San rock paintings. Antiquity 86: 696–706.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. 1873. Notebook II-28. Available at: http://lloydbleekcollection.cs.uct.ac.za/books/BC_151_A2_1_034/A2_1_34_02566.html (accessed 11 July 2013).Google Scholar
Orpen, J.M. 1874. A glimpse into the mythology of the Maluti Bushmen. Cape Monthly Magazine 9: 1–13.Google Scholar
Siegel, B. 2008. Water spirits and mermaids: the Copperbelt case, in Drewal, H.J. (ed.) Sacred waters: arts for Mami Wata and other divinities in Africa and the diaspora: 303–13. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Skotnes, P. 1996. The thin black line: diversity in the paintings of the southern San and the Bleek and Lloyd Collection, in Deacon, T.A. & Dowson, J. (ed.) Voices from the past: /Xam Bushmen and the Bleek and Lloyd Collection: 234–44. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Skotnes, P. 2007. Claim to the country: the /Xam archive of Wilhelm Bleek and Lucy Lloyd. Cape Town: Jacana; Athens (OH): Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, A. 1997. The myth of ritual origins? Ethnography, mythology and interpretation of San rock art. South African Archaeological Bulletin 52: 3–13.Google Scholar
Solomon, A. 2008. Myths, making and consciousness: dynamics and differences in San rock arts. Current Anthropology 49: 59–76.Google Scholar
Solomon, A. 2011. Writing San histories: the /Xam and ‘shamanism’ revisited. Journal of Southern African Studies 37: 99–117.Google Scholar
Stow, G.W. 1905. The native races of South Africa. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Vinnicombe, P. 1976. People of the eland: rock paintings of the Drakensberg Bushmen as a reflection of their life and thought. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Wessels, M. 2010. Bushman letters: interpreting /Xam narrative. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar