Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:58:47.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The curing of hides and skins in European prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

W. Groenman-van Waateringe
Affiliation:
Amsterdams Archeologisch Centrum/Instituut voor Prae-en Protohistorie (AAC/IPP), Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. [email protected] [email protected]
M. Kilian
Affiliation:
The Netherlands Centre for Geo-Ecological Research, Department of Palynology and Paleo/actuo-Ecology, Kruislaan 318, 1098 SM Amsterdam, Netherlands
H. van Londen
Affiliation:
Amsterdams Archeologisch Centrum/Instituut voor Prae-en Protohistorie (AAC/IPP), Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. [email protected] [email protected]

Abstract

Leather, hide and fur were probably the preferred material for all kinds of equipment (tents, bags, pots and drinking vessels) and clothing in prehistory. It is therefore remarkable that our knowledge of this material is so restricted, and its survival even in suitable circumstances very limited. Palynological data and experimental methods attempt to explain this phenomenon.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, F.E. 1992a. Zu den Tragsacken aus dem Salzbergwerk Hallstatt, Archaeologia Austriaca 76: 1217.Google Scholar
Barth, F.E. 1992b. Prahistorisches Schuhwerk aus den Salzbergwerken Hallstatt und Diirrnberg/Hallein, in Lippert, A. & Spindler, K. (ed.), Festschrift zum 50-jahrigen Bestehen des Institutes für Ur- und Frühgeschichte der Leopold-Franzens Universitat Innsbruck: 2535. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R. 1972. An archaeological perspective. New York (NY) & London: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Dieck, A. 1965. Die europaischen Moorleichenfunde (Hominidenmoorfunde). Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag.Google Scholar
Dupont, L. & Brenninkmeijer, C.A.M.. 1984. Palaeobotanic and isotope analysis of late Subboreal and early Subatlantic peat from Engbertsdijksveen VII. the Netherlands, Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 41: 24171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdtmann, G. 1960. The acetolysis method, Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 54: 5614.Google Scholar
Forbes, R.J. 1966. Studies in ancient technology V. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Fægri, K., Kaland, P.E. & Krzywinski, K.. 1989. Textbook of pollen analysis. 4th edition. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Geel, B. Van. 1978. A palaeoecological study of Holocene peat bog sections in Germany and the Netherlands, based on the analysis of pollen, spores and macro-and microscopic remains of fungi, algae, cormophytes and animals. Dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1967. Romeins lederwerk ait Valkenburg Z.H. Groningen: J.B. Wolters. Nederlandse Oudheden 2.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1970. Pre- en (proto)historisch schoeisel uit Drenthe, Nieuwe Drentse Volksalmanak 88: 24162.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1984. Die Lederfunde von Haithabu. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag. Berichte über die Ausgrabungen in Haithabu 21.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1990. De kledingstukken van leder en bont, in van der Sanden, W.A.B., Mens en moeras: Veenlijken in Nederland van de bronstijd tot en met de Romeinse tijd: 17480. Assen: Drents Museum.Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1993. Analysis of hides and skins from the Hauslabjoch, in Egg, M. Goedecker-Ciolek, R. Groenman-van Waateringe, W. & Spindler, K., Die Gletschermumie vom Ende der Steinzeit aus den Otztaler Alpen: 11428. Mainz: Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum. Jahrbuch des Romisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 39 (1992).Google Scholar
Groenman-Van Waateringe, W. 1995. Pollenanalyse als Indikator fur das Gerbeverfahren bei den Tierfellen des Eismannes, in Spindler et al. (ed.): 6770.Google Scholar
Hald, M. 1972. Primitive shoes. An archaeological-ethnological study based upon shoe finds from the Jutland Peninsula. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark. Publications, Arch. Hist. Ser. 13.Google Scholar
Hald, M. 1980. Ancient Danish textiles from bogs and burials. A comparative study of costume and Iron Age textiles. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark. Publications, Arch. Hist. Ser. 21.Google Scholar
Hopfel, E Platzer, W. & Spindler, K. (ed.). 1992. Der Mann im Eis I. Innsbruck: Eigenverlag der Universität Innsbruck. Veroffentlichungen der Universitat Innsbruck 187.Google Scholar
Lange, J. 1992. Vorläufige Befunde der Untersuchungen an Pelzlederproben, in Hopfel et al. (ed.): 41934.Google Scholar
Moore, P.D., Webb, J.A. & Collinson, M.E.. 1991. Pollen analysis. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiter, A. 1969. Een chemische bijdrage tot de kennis van het roken van vis. Dissertation, Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen.Google Scholar
Spindler, K., Rastbichler-Zissernig, E. Wileing, H. Zur Nedden, D. & Nothdurfter, H. (ed.). 1995. Der Mann im Eis. Neue Funde und Ergebnisse: 6770. Vienna & New York (NY): Springer Verlag. Veröffentlichungen des Forschungsinstituts fur Alpine Vorzeit der Universität Innsbruck 2.Google Scholar
Spriggs, J.A. 1998. The British beaver — fur, fact and fantasy, in Cameron, E. (ed.), Leather and fur. Aspects of early medieval trade and technology. 91101. London: Archetype.Google Scholar
Winiger, J. 1995. Die Bekleidung des Eismannes und die Anfänge der Weberei nordlich der Alpen, in Spindler et al. (ed.): 11987.Google Scholar