Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T11:31:32.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextual archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

John C. Barrett
John C. Barrett*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, The University, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ian Hodder's book, Reading the past (1986), was reviewed in the last number (Gardin 1987). Here a further comment is offered on Hodder's proposal for a ‘contextual archaeology’.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 233 , November 1987 , pp. 468 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J.C. 1987a. Food, gender and metal: questions of social reproduction, in Sørensen, M.L. & Thomas, R. (ed.), The Bronze Age-Iron Age transition in Europe; aspects of continuity and change in European societies c. 1200 to 500 bc. Oxford: BAR International Series.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. 1987b. The living, the dead and the ancestors; Neolithic and EBA mortuary practices, in Barrett, J.C. & Kinnes, I. (ed.), The archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C. Forthcoming. Fields of discourse: reconstituting a social archaeology, Critique of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1979. Symbolic power, Critique of Anthropology 4: 77–86.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. 1981. The emergence of formal disposal areas and the ‘problem’ of megalithic tombs in prehistoric Europe, in Chapman, R., Kinnes, I. & Randsborg, K. (ed.), The archaeology of death 71–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1956. Piecing together the past. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. & Marcus, G.E.. 1986. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1982. Afterword: the subject and power, in Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P., Michel Foucault; beyond structuralism and hermeneutics: 208–26. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Gardin, J.-C. 1987. Review of Hodder 1986, Antiquity 61: 322–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1984. Burials, houses and women in the European Neolithic, in Miller, D. & Tilley, C. (ed.) Ideology, power and prehistory: 51–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1985. Postprocessual archaeology, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past; current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1987. (ed.) The archaeology of contextual meanings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1986. Space, text and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patrik, L. 1985 Is there an archaeological record? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 27–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1976. Megaliths, territories and populations, in de Laet, S.J. (ed.), Acculturation and continuity in Atlantic Europe: 198–220. Bruges: De Tempel. (Dissertationes archaeologicae Gandenses 16.)Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1983. Towards an archaeology of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samson, R. 1987. Social structures from ‘Reihengräber’: mirror or mirage, Scottish Archaeological Review 4(2).Google Scholar
Shanks, M. & Tilley, C.. 1987. Re-constructing archaeology; theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yengoyan, A.A. 1985. Digging for symbols: the archaeology of everyday material life, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 51: 329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar