Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:58:39.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH PLACE-NAMES. By Eilert Ekwall. Oxford University Press, 1936. pp. 520. 15s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

O. G. S. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Antiquity , Volume 10 , Issue 40 , December 1936 , pp. 491 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It is to be wished that some enterprising publisher would persuade Mr Toms to re–issue his articles in book form. A Batsford ‘Book of Ponds’, with abundant plans as well as beautiful photographs, would be a welcome addition to the topographer’s library.

2 Monumenta Britannica, Bodleian Library.

3 Custom is King, 1936, p. 188 Google Scholar I am indebted to Canon Doble for kindly putting me right.

4 This information reached me too late for use on the first edition of the Ordnance Survey map of Britain in the Dark Ages (South sheet).

5 See Phillimore, , Y Cymmrodor, 1892, 11, 173;Google Scholar Liber Landavensis, ed. 1893, p. 47 and index;Google Scholar John, Rhys, Arthurian Legend. 81, 365.Google Scholar

6 Vit. Anon. S. Cuthbert, St. Omer, MS. 267, 9th century ; cf. Bede, Vit. Cuthb. Acta SS. 1736, Mar. III, 108.

7 This occurs in a Perambulation of Blackmore Forest (Hearne’s, Adam de Domerham, 1727, 2, 653).Google Scholar the passage was accidentally omitted from Hutchins’s transcription (History of Dorset 4, 519).Google Scholar

8 For other instances see ANTIQUITY, 1934, 8, 338–9.Google Scholar