Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:30:03.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on ‘Debating a great site: Ban Non Wat and the wider prehistory of Southeast Asia’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2015

Joyce White
Joyce White*
Affiliation:
Penn Museum, 3260 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6324, USA (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many of the components of this argument can be seen as a matter of debate; for example, the occurrence at sites in north-east Thailand of indisputably Bronze Age flexed burials contradicts Higham's contention that flexed graves represent earlier indigenous hunter-gatherer populations. The occurrence of tin-bronze artefacts in ordinary graves at other sites in north-east Thailand belies the proposed scenario that bronze was necessarily a ‘prestige valuable’ that generated a competitive milieu, particularly as the early metal artefacts at Ban Non Wat are unalloyed copper. It is my view that although the argument may initially appear convincing, it is based on selected, simplified and flawed data chosen to fit pre-determined social and chronological models.

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 89 , Issue 347 , October 2015 , pp. 1230 - 1232
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boudin, M., Boeck, P., Vandenabeele, P. & van Strydonck, M.. 2013. Improved radiocarbon dating for contaminated archaeological bone collagen, silk, wool and hair samples via cross-flow nanofiltrated amino acids. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 27: 2039–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6652 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busschers, F.S., Wesselingh, F.P., Kars, R.H., Versluijs-Helder, M., Wallinga, J., Bosch, J.H.A., Timmner, J., Nierop, K.G.J., Meijer, T., Bunnik, F.P.M. & de Wolf, H.. 2014. Radiocarbon dating of late Pleistocene marine shells from the southern North Sea. Radiocarbon 56: 1151–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/56.16505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedel, S., Southon, J.R., Taylor, R.E., Kuzmin, Y.V., Street, M., Higham, T.F.G., van der Plicht, J., Nadeau, M.-J. & Nawalade-Chavan, S.. 2013. Assessment of interlaboratory pretreatment protocols by radiocarbon dating an elk bone found below Laacher See tephra at Miesenheim IV (Rhineland, Germany). Radiocarbon 55: 1443–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, R., Wood, R., Fallon, S., Stafford, T.W. & Southon, J.. 2014. New 14C dates for Spring Creek and Mowbray Swamp megafauna: XAD-2 processing. Archaeology in Oceania 50: 43–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arco.5045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, C.F.W. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2009. A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat. Antiquity 83: 125–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598×00098136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, C.F.W., Higham, T.F.G. & Douka, K.. 2015 (in press). A new chronological framework for the Bronze Age of Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE.Google Scholar
King, C.L., Tayles, N. & Gordon, K.C.. 2011. Re-examining the chemical evaluation of diagenesis in human bone apatite. Journal of Archaeological Science 38: 2222–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Z., Mischke, S. & Madsen, D.. 2014. Paleoenvironmental implications of new OSL dates on the formation of the ‘Shell Bar’ in the Qaidam Basin, northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Paleolimnology 51: 197–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10933–013–9710–1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marom, A., McCullagh, J.S.O., Higham, T.F.G., Sinitsyn, A.A. & Hedges, R.E.M.. 2012. Single amino acid radiocarbon dating of Upper Paleolithic modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109: 6878–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigott, V.C. 1998. Prehistoric copper mining in the context of emerging community craft specialisation in northeast Thailand, in Knapp, A.B., Pigott, V.C. & Herbert, E.W. (ed.) Social approaches to an industrial past: the archaeology and anthropology of mining: 205–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.E. & Bar-Yosef, O.. 2014. Radiocarbon dating: an archaeological perspective (second edition). Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.Google Scholar
Tucci, A., Sayavongkhamdy, T., Chang, N. & Souksavatdy, V.. 2014. Ancient copper mining in Laos: heterachies, incipient states or post-state anarchists? Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology 2 (2): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jaa.v2n2a1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, G.E., Price, G.J., Nothdurft, L.D., Deer, L. & Rintoul, L.. 2007. Cryptic meteoric diagenesis in freshwater bivalves: implications for radiocarbon dating. Geology 35: 803–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G23823A.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J.C. n.d. Changing paradigms in Southeast Asian archaeology. Keynote address for the 14th International Conference of the European Association for Southeast Asian Archaeologists, 18–21 September 2012, Dublin, Ireland. Accepted for publication in conference proceedings.Google Scholar
White, J.C. & Pigott, V.C.. 1996. From community craft to regional specialization: intensification of copper production in pre-state Thailand, in Wailes, B. (ed.) Craft specialization and social evolution: in memory of V. Gordon Childe (University Museum Monograph 93): 151–75. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar