Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:05:54.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cold War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

N. James
N. James*
Affiliation:
Centre for Regional Studies, Department of History, Anglia Polytechnic University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News & Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 293 , September 2002 , pp. 664 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, CM. 2002. The archaeology of scientific experiments at a nuclear testing ground, in Schofield, et al. (ed.): 65–79.Google Scholar
Cocroft, W.D. 2000. Dangerous energy: the archaeology ofgunpowderandmilitary explosives manufacture. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Beck, CM. 2001. Cold War monuments: an assessment by the Monuments Protection Programme (CD). London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Defence. 2002. Defence of Britain Project, http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/cata-logue/resources.html?dob Google Scholar
Dobinson, C., Lake, J. & Schofield, A.J. 1997. Monuments of war: defining England’s 20th-century defence heritage, Antiquity 71: 288–99.Google Scholar
English Heritage. 2000. Twentieth-century military sites. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Johnson, W.G. & Beck, C. 1998. Nevada Test Site, in Schofield, (ed.): 20.Google Scholar
Mccamley, N.J. Cold War secret nuclear hunkers: the passive defence of the Western world during the Cold War. Barnsley: Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. (ed.). 1998. Monuments of war: tlie evaluation, recording and management of twentieth-century military sites. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. & Anderton, M. 2000. The queer archaeology of Green Gate: interpreting contested space at Greenham Common Airhase, World Archaeology 32(2): 236–51.Google Scholar
Schofield, J., Johnson, W.G. & Beck, C.M. (ed.). 2002. Matériel mi-ture: the archaeology of twentieth century conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Subbrtt. 2001. Subterranea Britannica Cold War Research Study Group. http://www.subbrit.org.uk Google Scholar
Uzzell, D. 1998. The hot interpretation of the Cold War, in Schofield, (ed.): 18–21.Google Scholar
Whorton, M. 2002. Evaluating and managing Cold War era historic properties: the cultural significance of US Air Force defensive radar systems, in Schofield, et al. (ed.): 216–26.Google Scholar