Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:54:30.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chinese school of archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Zhang Liangren
Zhang Liangren*
Affiliation:
*School of Cultural Heritage, Northwest University, 229 Taibai Beilu, Xi'an, 710069, China (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1959, at a meeting reviewing the 'archaeological achievements of the past 10 years' in celebration of the tenth anniversary of the 'New China (1949-)', the leading archaeologist Yin Da (1906-1983), then director of the Institute of Archaeology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), urged all the archaeologists in China "to cooperate fully, so that in the next three or five years, in the entire nation, we can build up a scientific and holistic system out of all cultural remains of all periods; that is to say, to build up a Marxist Chinese archaeological system" (Yin 1959: 123).

This call had two keywords in it.One was 'Chinese'. Ever since the early twentieth century, growing nationalism had drum-beaten Chinese archaeologists to search for Chinese cultural origins (Liu & Chen 2001: 317). A particularly urgent matter for archaeologists of the 1950s was to dispel the notion of 'the western origin of Chinese culture' that was current among foreign and native archaeologists during theNationalist Era (1911-1949). To achieve this goal, it was imperative to undertake archaeological investigation systematically so as to prove the autochthonous origins and undisrupted development of Chinese civilisations. The second word, 'Marxist', reflects a process of cutting the umbilical cord of the reborn archaeology of the 'New China' from the 'bourgeois archaeology' of the 'Old China' and swaddling the discipline with the mantle of Marxist theories and models

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 87 , Issue 337 , September 2013 , pp. 896 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1955. Sulian ‘Kaoguxue tonglun’ jiaoxue dagang. Kaogu Tongxun 1: 71—77.Google Scholar
Artsikhovskii, A.V. 1956. Kaoguxue jichu. Translated by Yudong, Louet al. Beijing: Kexue.Google Scholar
Avdushin, D.A. 1956. ‘Tianye kaogu gongzuo fangfa’ jiaoxue dagang. Translated by Yudong, Lou. Kaogu Tongxun 1: 80—84.Google Scholar
Beijing Daxue Lishixi Kaogu Zhuanye. 1960. Zhongguo kaoguxue. Unofficial publication.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1981. Archaeology and Chinese historiography. World Archaeology 13: 156—169.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1986. The archaeology of ancient China. New Haven (CT) & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, X. 1997. Zhongguo shiqian kaoguxueshiyanjiu 1895-1949. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.Google Scholar
Fei, X. 1956. Kaizhan shaoshu minzu diqu he yu shaoshu minzu lishi youguan de diqu de kaogu gongzuo: zai kaogu gongzuo huiyishang de fayan. Kaogu Tongxun 3: 1—10.Google Scholar
Fei, X. 1989. Zhonghua minzu de duoyuan yiti geju (translated by Jian, Leng), in Fei, X. (ed.) Zhongguo minzu duoyuan titi geju: 1—36. Beijing: Zhongyang Minzu Xueyuan.Google Scholar
Feili, H. 1999. Yu Zhang Guangzhi jiaotan, in Zhang, G. (ed.) Kaogu renleixue suibi:205—244. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.Google Scholar
Fu, S. 1996 [1933]. Yi-Xia dongxi shuo, in Fu, S. (ed.) Fu Sinian xuanji: 247—292. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin.Google Scholar
Gening, V.F. 1982. Ocherkipo istorii sovetskoi arkheologii: u istokov formirovaniia marksistskikh teoreteskikh osnov sovetskoi arkheologii, 20-e-pervaia polovina 30-kh gg. Kiev: Nauka.Google Scholar
Guo, M. 1954 [1930]. Zhongguo gudai shehui yanjiu. Beijing: Renmin.Google Scholar
Kiselev, S.V. 1950. Jixieliefu jiangyanji. Translated by Quanxin, Zhang, Bingyi, Chen, Zerong, Liu & Langshan, Liao. Beijing: Zhongsu Youhao Xiehui.Google Scholar
Li, J. 1990 [1934]. Zhongguo kaoguxue zhi guoqu yu jianglai, in Li, J. (ed.) Li Ji kaoguxue lunwen xuanji: 46—54. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Ligong, . 1958. Jiaqiang shaoshu minzu diqu de kaogu gongzuo. Kaogu 10: 66.Google Scholar
Liu, L. & Chen, X.. 2001. China, in Murray, T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of archaeology: history and discoveries. Volume 1: 315—233. Santa Barbara (CA): ABC CLIO.Google Scholar
Liu, L. & Chen, X.. 2012. The archaeology of China: from the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Z. 1934. Shiqianqi zhongguo shehui yanjiu. Beiping: Beiping Renwen Shudian.Google Scholar
Mongait, A.L.. 1963. Sulian kaoguxue [Soviet archaeology]. Translated by Zhongguo Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo Tushuguan. Unofficial publication.Google Scholar
Montelius, O. 1903. Die älteren Kulturperioden im Orient und in Europa, vol. 1. Stockholm: Sune Lindqvist.Google Scholar
Pepper, S. 1987. Education for the new order, in MacFarquhar, R. & Fairbank, J.K. (ed.) The Cambridge history of China, volume 4, part 1: 185—217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1965. Guanyu Yangshao wenhua de ruogan wenti. Kaogu Xuebao 1: 51—82.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1984a [1948]. Doujitai goudongqu muzang (excerpt), in Su, B. (ed.) Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanji: 3—58. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1984b [1950]. Ruhe shi kaogu gongzuo chengwei renmin de shiye, in Su, B. (ed.) Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanji: 277—282. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1984c [1953]. Muqian kaogu gongzuo zhong cunzai de wenti, in Su, B. (ed.) Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanji: 284—289. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1984d [1959]. Luoyang Zhongzhoulu (Xigongduan) Jieyu, in Su, B. (ed.) Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanji: 65—87. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1984e [1981]. Jianguo yilai Zhongguo kaoguxue de fazhan, in Su, B. (ed.) Su Bingqi kaoguxue lunshu xuanji: 299—305. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1989. Huanbohai kaogu yu Qingzhou kaogu. Kaogu 1: 47—50.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1991. Guanyu chongjian Zhongguo shiqianshi de sikao. Kaogu 12: 1109—1118.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1994 [1987]. Gei qingnianren de hua, in Su, B. (ed.) Huaren, long de chuanren, zhongguoren: kaogu xungenji: 210—219. Shenyang: Liaoning Daxue.Google Scholar
Su, B. 2009 [1997]. Zhongguo wenming qiyuan xintan. Shenyang: Liaoning Daxue.Google Scholar
Su, B. & Yin, W.. 1981. Guanyu kaoguxue wenhua de quxi leixing wenti. Wenwu 5: 10—17.Google Scholar
Su, B. 1982. Dicengxue and Qiwu xingtaixue. Wenwu 4: 1—7.Google Scholar
Suliankaoguxue Shelun. 1953. Sidalin guanyu yuyanxue wenti ji jingji wenti de zhuzuo yu sulian kaoguxuejiamen de renwu. Translated by Yidong, Zhang. Kaogu Xuebao 6: 1—16.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, T. 1997. Establishing the Chinese archaeological school: Su Bingqi and contemporary Chinese archaeology. Antiquity 71: 31—39.Google Scholar
Xia, N. 1952. Tianye kaogu xulun. Wenwu Cankao Ziliao 4: 81—90.Google Scholar
Xia, N. 1954. Zhongguo kaoguxue de xianzhuang. Wenwu Cankao Ziliao 1: 60—70.Google Scholar
Xia, N. 1962. Xin Zhongguo de kaoguxue. Kaogu 9: 453—458.Google Scholar
Xu, X. 2003. Zhongguo gushi de chuanshuo shidai. Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue.Google Scholar
Yan, W. 1987. Zhongguo shiqian wenhua de tongyixing yu duoyangxing. Wenwu 3: 38—50.Google Scholar
Yan, W. 1989 [1980]. Lun Banpo leixing he Miaodigou leixing, in Yan, W. (ed.) Yangshao Wenhua yanjiu: 110—121. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Yan, W. 1997 [1985]. Kaogu ziliao zhengli zhong de biaoxingxue yanjiu, in Yan, W. (ed.) Zouxiang ershiyi shiji de kaoguxue: 53—77. Xi'an: Sanqin.Google Scholar
Yang, K. 1984. Minzuxue gailun. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue.Google Scholar
Yin, D. 1955. Lun woguo xinshiqishidai de yanjiu gongzuo. Kaogu Tongxun 2: 1—4.Google Scholar
Yin, D. 1959. Zuzhi qilai dajia dongshou bianxie 'shinian kaogu.‘ Kaogu 3: 119—123.Google Scholar
Yin, D. 1989 [1943]. Zhongguo yuanshi shehui, in Yin, D. (ed.) Yin Da shixue lunzhu xuanji: 8—226. Beijing: Renmin.Google Scholar
Yu, W. 1989. Guanyu “kaogu leixingxue” wenti, in Yu, W. (ed.) Kaogu leixingxue de lilun yu shijian: 1—35. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. 2011. Soviet inspiration in Chinese archaeology. Antiquity 85: 1049—1059.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. 1983. Dicengxue yu leixingxue de ruogan wenti. Wenwu 5: 60—69.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. 1994. Zhongguo kaoguxueshi de jidian renshi, in Zhang, Z. (ed.) Zhongguo kaoguxue: Shijian, lilun, fangfa: 45—57. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Guji.Google Scholar
Zheng, Z. 1956. Kaogu shiye de chengjiu he jinhou nuli de fangxiang. Kaogu Tongxun 2: 9—16.Google Scholar
Zhongguo Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo. 1960. Xinzhongguo de kaogu shouhuo. Beijing: Kexue.Google Scholar
Zou, H. 1956. Shilun Zhengzhou xin faxian de Yin Shang wenhua yizhi. Kaogu Xuebao 3: 77—103.Google Scholar
Zou, H. 1964. Shilun Yinxu wenhua fenqi. Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Renwen kexue ban) 4: 77—103 & 5: 63 — 90.Google Scholar