Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T19:27:35.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beazley as theorist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

James Whitley
James Whitley*
Affiliation:
School of History & Archaeology, University of Wales, PO Box 909, Cardiff CF1 3XU, Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sir John Beazley (1885-1970), founder of the modern and archaeological study of Classical vases, was a master of method. Is the Beazley method just that, a well-judged method fitting to the material under study? Or does that considered method in truth amount to a considered theory, held and used by a consciously most untheoretical archaeologist?

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 271 , March 1997 , pp. 40 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, M. 1986. Signed against unsigned [review of Kurtz 1985b], Times Literary Supplement (12 September): 1013.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1911. The Master of the Berlin Amphora, Journal of Hellenic Studies 31: 276–95.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1918. Attic red-figured vases in American museums. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1922. Citharoedus, Journal of Hellenic Studies 42: 70–98.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1926. Introduction, in Pfuhl 1926: vi.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1951. The development of Attic black figure. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1956. Attic black-figure vase painters. Oxford; Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1963. Attic red-figure vase painters. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. 1989. Attic black-figure: a sketch, in Beazley & Kurtz: 125.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. & Kurtz, D.C.. 1983. The Berlin Painter. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beazley, J.D. (ed.). 1989. Greek vases: lectures by J.D. Beazley. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Berenson, B. 1926. Three essays on method. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Board Man, J. 1985. Classical archaeology in Oxford, in Kurtz, (1985b): 43–55.Google Scholar
Board Man, J. 1994. Foreword, in Evely, D. et al. (ed.), Knossos: a labyrinth of History: papers presented in honour of Sinclair Hood: xv–xvi. London: British School at Athens.Google Scholar
Buitron-Oliver, D. 1995. Douris: a master-painter of Athenian red-figure vases. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Burn, L. 1987. The Meidias Painter. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cherry, J.F. 1992. Beazley in the Bronze Age? Reflections on attribution studies in Aegean prehistory, in Laffineur, R. & Crowley, J.L. (ed.), Eikon: Aegean Bronze Age iconography : shaping a methodology. 123–44. Liège: Université de Liège. Aegaeum 8.Google Scholar
Childe, V.O. 1958. Retrospect, Antiquity 32: 69–74.Google Scholar
Cook, R.M. 1972. Greek painted pottery. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Desbqrough, V.R.d'A. 1952. Protogeometric pottery. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1990. Significant details: systems, certainties and the art-historian as detective, Antiquity 64: 950–52.Google Scholar
Fürtwangler, A. & Reichold, K.. 1904. Griechische Vasenmalerei: Auswahl Hervorvangender Vasenbilder. Munich: F. Bruckmann.Google Scholar
Getz-Preziosi, P. 1987. Sculptors of the Cyclades: individual and tradition in the third millennium BC. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. & Chippindale, C.. 1993. Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figurines, American Journal of Archaeology 97: 601–59.Google Scholar
Glnzburg, C. 1990. Clues: roots of an evidential paradigm, in Ginzburg, C., Myths, emblems, clues: 96–125. London: Hutchinson Radius.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L.H. 1961. The local scripts of Archaic Greece. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D. 1985a. Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases, in Greek vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum 2:237–50. Malibu (CA): J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D. (Ed.). 1985b. Beazley and Oxford. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Maginnis, H.B.J. 1990. The role of perceptual learning in connoisseurship: Morelli, Berenson and beyond, Art History 13:104–17.Google Scholar
Marchand, S.L. 1996. Down from Olympus: archaeology and philhellenism in Germany 1750-1970. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morelli, G. 1892. Italion painters: critical studies of their works 1 : The Borghese and Doria-Pamfili Galleries in Rome. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Morris, C.E. 1993. Hands up for the individual! The role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 41–66.Google Scholar
Morris, I. 1994. Archaeologies of Greece, in Morris, I. (ed.), Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies: 8–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.H. 1990. The Phiale Painter. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Payne, H. 1931. Necrocorinthia. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pfuhl, E. 1923. Malerei und Zeichnung der Griechen. Munich: Brackmann.Google Scholar
Pfuhl, E. 1926. Masterpieces of Greek drawing and painting. [Translation by Beazley, J.D..] London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Podro, M. 1982. The critical historians of art. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. 1995. The Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. 1987. Value and simplicity: eighteenth-century taste and the study of Greek vases, Past and Present 116: 98–137.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. & Gill, D.. 1994. Artful crafts: ancient Greek silverware and pottery. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Williams, D. 1993. [Reply to Morris (1993)], Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3: 61–2.Google Scholar