Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:38:24.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological theory in France and Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Chris Scarre
Chris Scarre*
Affiliation:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

French archaeologyBritish archaeologyarchaeological theoryNew Archaeologypost-processualism
Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 279 , March 1999 , pp. 155 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audouze, F., & Leroi-Gourhan, A.. 1981. France: a continental insularity, World Archaeology 13: 170–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintliff, J. 1991. Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory, Antiquity 65: 274–8.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1970. Beaker pottery of Great Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity 47: 6–18.Google Scholar
Cleuziou, S. & Demoule, J.-P.. 1980. Situation de l’archéologie theorique, Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie: 7–15 Google Scholar
Cleuziou, S., Coudart, A. Demoule, J.-P. & Schnapp, A.. 1991. The use of theory in French archaeology, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe: The last three decades: 91–128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coudart, A. 1998. Andre Leroi-Gourhan (1911–1986), in Murray, T. (ed.), Archaeologists: a biographical encyclopedia: ??page nos??. New York (NY): Garland Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. & Renfrew, C.. 1988. The idea of prehistory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M. & Champion, T. (ed.). 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Gardin, J.-C. 1970. Archeologie et calculateurs: problemes mathematiques et sémiologiques. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Gardin, J.-C. 1980. Archaeological constructs. An aspect of theoretical archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1981. Review of ‘Archaeological constructs. An aspect of theoretical archaeology’ by Jean-Claude, Gardin, Antiquity 55: 60–61.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L. & Fawcett, C. (ed.). 1995. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1964. Le geste et la parole 1: Technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1965a. Le Geste et la Parole 2: La memoire et les rhythmes. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1965b. Prehistoire de léart occidental. Paris: Mazenod.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1982. The dawn of European art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, L. Forthcoming. L’archeologie francaise et le Régime de Vichy (1940–1944), Journal of European Archaeology.Google Scholar
Olivier, L. & Coudart, A.. 1995. French tradition and the central place of history in the human sciences, in Ucko, (ed.): 363–81.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1981. Les Annales et l’archeologie: une rencontre difficile, Mélanges de l’Ecole Française de Rome: Antiquités 93: 469–78.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1996. French archaeology: between national identity and cultural identity, in Diaz-Andreu, M. & Champion, T. (ed.), Nationalism and archaeology in Europe: 48–67. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Sonneville Bordes, D. De. 1960. Le Paleolithique supérieure en Périgord. Bordeaux: Delmas.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1995. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s, in Ucko, (ed.): 343–62.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ucko, P.J. (ed.).1995. Theory in archaeology: A world perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J., LeBlanc, S.A. & Redman, C.L.. 1971. Explanation in archaeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York (NY): Academic Press.Google Scholar