Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:18:31.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Draughtsmanship: Principles and Practice Part I: Principles and Retrospect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Stuart Piggott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

All technical and scientific illustration is at once symbol and communication, a pictorial language addressing the author's audience side by side with his written text. It transmits information according to an agreed code of conventions which translates actuality into forms and outlines in one or more colours, usually black on white, in a manner which will convey to the observer the features of the original which the illustrator wishes to present. As Winston Churchill wrote of painting, ‘the canvas receives a message despatched a few seconds before from the natural object. But it has also come through a post office en route. It has been transmitted in code . . . it reaches the canvas a cryptogram’. Archaeological draughtsmanship involves the construction of technical cryptograms, and as in all ciphers these must be made according to rules carefully observed by both transmitter and recipient.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 39 , Issue 155 , September 1965 , pp. 165 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

[1] Painting as a Pastime (1948), 28Google Scholar, quoted by Gombrich, E. H., Art and Illusion (1960), 38Google Scholar.

[2] Archaeology from the Earth (1954), 59Google Scholar.

[3] Fairservis, W. A., Excavations in the Quetta Valley, West Pakistan (1956), 202–03.Google Scholar

[4] Gombrich, E. H., Art and Illusion (1960), 90Google Scholar.

[5] For Lhwyd, Lister and the Ashmolean circle, Gunther, R. T., Early Science in Oxford, XIV, 1945 Google Scholar.

[6] Evans, Joan, History of the Society of Antiquaries (1956), 57Google Scholar; Seznec, J., Essais sur Diderot et I’Antiquité (1957), 128.Google Scholar

[7] J. Seznec, op. cit., ch. v; Daniel, G. E., Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of France (1960), 16Google Scholar.

[8] Witsen, N. C. (1641–1717), Noord- en Oost-Tartarye (1785)Google Scholar; reproduced in Rudenko, S. I., Sibirskaya Kollektsiya Petra I (1962), pls. 1–3Google Scholar.

[9] For Hoare, and Crocker, , Meyrick, O., Wilts. Arch. Mag., LII, 1948, 213 Google Scholar; Roy, G. Macdonald, Arch., LXVIII, 1917, 161 Google Scholar.

[10] Carter, H., Orlando Jewitt (1962)Google Scholar.

[11] Joan Evans, op. cit., 351.

[12] SirWoolley, Leonard, Spadework (1953), 14Google Scholar; quoted with comment by SirWheeler, Mortimer, Still Digging (1955), 67Google Scholar.

[13] Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Archaeological Society, XIII, 1895, 453 Google Scholar, and pls. II–IV.

[14] Still Digging (1955). 72Google Scholar.