Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:50:06.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An archaeology of digital things: social, political, polemical

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2021

Colleen Morgan
Colleen Morgan*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, UK (✉ [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 95 , Issue 384 , December 2021 , pp. 1590 - 1593
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aycock, J. 2021. The coming tsunami of digital artefacts. Antiquity 95: 1584–89. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2021.84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, C. & Montgomery, N.. 2017. Joyful militancy: building thriving resistance in toxic times. Chico (CA): AK Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. 1997. Mothers, monsters, and machines, in Medina, K.C.N., Medina, N. & Stanbury, S. (ed.) Writing on the body: female embodiment and feminist theory: 59–79. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brazelton, B. 2020. On the 10-year anniversary of Minecraft: two interventions in extractive colonialism. Cultural Geographies 27: 491–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474019890319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. 2001. Difference and repetition. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Flexner, J. 2021. Archaeology, anarchism, decolonization, and degrowth through the lens of Frase's four futures. Archaeological Dialogues 28: 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. 1985. A manifesto for cyborgs: science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.Google Scholar
Harris, O.J.T. 2021. Assembling past worlds: materials, bodies and architecture in Neolithic Britain. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J.E., Arista, N., Pechawis, A. & Kite, S.. 2018. Making kin with the machines. Journal of Design and Science. https://doi.org/10.21428/bfafd97bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, N., Taylor, B. & Conneller, C.. 2018. Star Carr volume 1: a persistent place in a changing world. Leeds: White Rose University Press. https://doi.org/10.22599/book1Google Scholar
Mora, C. et al. 2018. Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C. Nature Climate Change 8: 931–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0321-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. 2012. Emancipatory digital archaeology. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. 2015. Minecraft for archaeological outreach. Available at: https://colleen-morgan.com/2015/09/28/minecraft-for-archaeological-outreach (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar
Morgan, C. 2019. Avatars, monsters, and machines: a cyborg archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology 22: 324–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2019.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. 2021. Save the date for future mourning. Forum Kritische Archäologie 10: 1–5.Google Scholar
Russell, L. 2020. Glitch feminism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar