Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:42:07.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What linked the Bell Beakers in third millennium BC Europe?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Marc Vander Linden
Marc Vander Linden*
Affiliation:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER UK (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this important new review the author shows that neither trade nor migration can account for the distribution of Bell Beakers and the associated artefacts and burial practices in Europe. The materials were generally local and rooted in local know-how. However recent stable isotope results show small-scale population changes associated with the arrival of Beaker practice. The distribution of Bell Beakers could thus reflect the movement of marriage partners.

Keywords

EuropeNeolithicBronze AgeBell Beakerspopulation movementstable isotope analysis
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 81 , Issue 312 , 1 June 2007 , pp. 343 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. 2005. Beaker settlement and environment on the Chalk Downs of southern England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71: 219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambert, P. 2001. La place de la métallurgie campaniforme dans la première métallurgie franc¸aise, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the international colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) 11-16 May 1998: 577–88. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. 2005. Mobile Men, Sedentary Women? Material culture as a marker of regional and supra-regional interaction in early Iron Age southwest Germany, in Dobrzanska, H., S.J.V., Megaw & Poleska, P. (ed.) Celts on the Margin: Studies in European Cultural Interaction 7th c. BC - 1st c. AD. Essays in Honor of Zenon Wozniak: 17–26. Krakow: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of the Sciences.Google Scholar
Barfield, L.H. 2001. Beaker lithics in northern Italy, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the international colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) 11-16 May 1998: 507–18. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Besse, M. 2003. Les céramiques communes des Campaniformes européens. Gallia Préhistoire 45: 205–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, N. 1997. New perspectives on the Bell-Beaker culture. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16: 297–314.Google Scholar
Budd, P., Millard, A., Chenery, C., Lucy, S. & Roberts, C.. 2004. Investigating population movement by stable isotope analysis: a report from Britain. Antiquity 78: 127–41.Google Scholar
Chambon, P. 2003. Les morts dans les sépultures collectives néolithiques en France. Du cadavre aux restes ultimes. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. 1968. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. 1976. The Beaker network - social and economic models, in Lanting, J.N. & Van Der Waals, J.D. (ed.) Glockenbecher Symposion Oberried 1974: 459–77. Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck.Google Scholar
Claustre, F. & Mazière, F.. 1998. La céramique campaniforme des Pyrénées-Orientales. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Fran¸aise 95: 383–92.Google Scholar
Convertini, F. & Querré, G.. 1998. Apports desétudes céramologiques en laboratoire à la connaissance du Campaniforme: résultats, bilan et perspectives. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Fran¸aise 95: 333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnetzki, A. 1984. The genetic influence of Bell Beaker central Europe, in Guilaine, J. (dir.) L'âge du cuivre européen. Civilisations à vases campaniformes: 121–8. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Delcourt-Vlaeminck, M. 2004. Les exportations du silex du Grand-Pressigny et du matériau tertiaire dans le nord-ouest de l'Europe au Néolithique final/Chalcolithique. Anthropologica et Praehistorica 115: 139–54.Google Scholar
Drenth, E. 1989. Een onderzoek naar aspecten van de symbolische betekenis van Grand-Pressigny en Pseudo-Grand-Pressigny dolken van de Enkelgrafcultuur in Nederland, in Niklewicz-Hokse, A.T.L. & Lagerwerf, C.A.G. (ed.) Bundel van de Steentijddag (Groningen, 1 April 1989): 100–21. Groningen: Biologisch-Archaeologisch Instituut.Google Scholar
Du Gardin, C. 1998. Le Campaniforme et l'ambre: mythe ou réalité. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Fran¸aise 95: 343–50.Google Scholar
Ericson, J.E. 1985. Strontium isotope characterization in the study of prehistoric ecology. Journal of Human Evolution 14: 503–14.Google Scholar
Evans, J.A., Chenery, A. & Fitzpatrick, A.P.. 2006. Bronze age childhood migration of individuals near Stonehenge, revealed by strontium and isotope tooth enamel analysis. Archaeometry 48: 309–21.Google Scholar
Garrido Pena, R. 1997. Bell Beakers in the southern Meseta of the Iberian Peninsula: socioeconomic context and new data. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 16: 187–209.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, K. 1976. Anthropotypologie der Glockenbecherleute in ihren Ausschwärmelandschaften, in Lanting, J.N. & J.D. van derWaals, (eds) Glockenbecher Symposion Oberried 1974: 147–66. Haarlem: Fibula - Van Dishoeck.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. 1992. Approaches to the later Neolithic and Bronze Age settlements of Britain, in Mordant, C. & Richard, A. (dir.) L'habitat et l'occupation du sol à l'Age du Bronze en Europe. Colloque international de Lons-le-Saunier, 15 -19 Mai 1990: 41–48. Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Gosselain, O.P. 2002. Poteries du Cameroun méridional: styles techniques et rapports à l'identité. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Guilaine, J., Claustre, F., Lemercier, O. & Sabatier, P.. 2001. Campaniformes et environnement culturel en France méditerranéenne, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy), 11-16 May 1998: 229–75. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. 1977. The Bell Beaker cultures of Spain and Portugal. Harvard: Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Heyd, V. 2000. Die Spätkupferzeit in Süddeutschland. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Ihuel, E. 2004. La diffusion du silex du Grand-Pressigny dans le massif armoricain au Néolithique. Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Joussaume, R. 1981. Le Néolithique de l'Aunis et du Poitou occidental dans son cadre atlantique. Rennes: Université de Rennes I.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-I. 2005. Formation and change in individual identity between the Bell Beaker culture and the Early Bronze Age in Bavaria, South Germany (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1450). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Lazarich González, M. 2000. Estado actual de la investigación sobre el Campaniforme en Andalucìa occidental. Madrider Mitteilungen 41: 112–38.Google Scholar
Leonini, V. 2004. La ceramica comune nei contesti insediativi del Campaniforme italiano. I: la documentazione dell'Italia settentrionale. Rivista di scienze prehistoriche 54: 337–410.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1949. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Machnik, J. 1991. The earliest Bronze Age in the Carpathian basin. Bradford: Department of Archaeological Sciences.Google Scholar
Mallet, N. 1992. Le Grand-Pressigny. Ses relations avec la civilisation Saône-Rhône. Argenton-sur-Creuse: Les Amis du Musée de Préhistoire du Grand-Pressigny.Google Scholar
Mallet, N., Richard, G., Genty, P. & Verjux, C.. 2004. La diffusion des silex du Grand-Pressigny dans le Bassin parisien. Anthropologica et Praehistorica 115: 123–38.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1923-1924. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés primitives. L'Année Sociologique (nouvelle série) 1: 30–186.Google Scholar
Menk, R. 1979. Le phénomène campaniforme: structures biologiques et intégration historique. Archives Suisses d'Anthropologie Générale 43: 259–84.Google Scholar
Millán, A. & Arribas, J.G.. 1994. La ceramica: estudio tecnologico, in Blasco, C. (ed.) El horizonte campaniforme de la region de Madrid en el centenario de Ciempozuelos: 117–26. Madrid: Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Needham, S. 2002. Analytical implications of Beaker metallurgy in North-West Europe, in Bartelheim, M., Pernicka, E. & Krause, R. (eds) Die Anfänge der Metallurgie in der Alten Welt: 99–134. Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Needham, S. 2005. Transforming Beaker culture in North-West Europe: process of fusion and fission. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71: 171–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1984. The Bell Beaker culture in east central Europe, in Guilaine, J. (dir.) L'âge du cuivre européen. Civilisations à vases campaniformes: 107–20. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Nicolis, F. & Mottes, E. (ed.) 1998. Simbolo ed enigma. Il bicchiere campaniforme e l'Italia nella preistoria europea dell III millennio a.C. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Orozco-Köhler, T., Bernabeu Aubán, J. & Molina González, F.. 2001. Exchange networks in Bell Beaker southeast Spain, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the international colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) 11-16 May 1998: 471–86. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 1995. Southwestern Bronze Age pottery, in Kinnes, I. & Varndell, G. (eds) “Unbaked urns of rudely shape”. Essays on British and Irish pottery for Ian Longworth: 89–100. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Pétrequin, P., Arbogast, R.-M., Bourquin-Mignot, C., Lavier, C. & Viellet, A.. 1998. Demographic growth, environmental changes and technical adaptations: responses of an agricultural community from the 32nd to the 30th centuries BC. World Archaeology 30: 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétrequin, P. & Jeunesse, C. (dir.). 1995. La hache de pierre. Carrières et échanges de lames polies pendant le Néolithique (5400-2100 av. J.-C.). Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Grupe, G. & Schröter, P.. 1998. Migration in the Bell Beaker period of central Europe. Antiquity 72: 405–11.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Knipper, C., Grupe, G. & Smrcka, V.. 2004. Strontium isotopes and prehistoric human migration: the Bell Beaker period in central Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 7: 9–40.Google Scholar
Rehman, F., Robinson, V.J. & Shennan, S.J.. 1992. A neutron activation study of bell beakers and associated pottery from Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Památky archeologické 83: 197–211.Google Scholar
Salanova, L. 2000. La question du Campaniforme en France et dans les î les anglo-normandes. Productions, chronologie et rôles d'un standard céramique. Paris: CTHS.Google Scholar
Salanova, L. 2004. The frontiers inside the western Bell Beaker block, in Czebreszuk, J. (ed.) Similar but different. Bell Beakers in Europe: 63–75. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Salanova, L. & Ducreux, F. (dir.). 2005. L'habitat campaniforme de la La Noue à Saint-Marcel (Saône-et-Loire). Eléments de définition du groupe bourguignon-jurassien. Gallia Préhistoire 47: 33–146.Google Scholar
Sarti, L. 1998. Aspetti insediativi del Campaniforme nell'Italia centrale, in Nicolis, F. & Mottes, E. (ed.) Simbolo ed enigma. Il bicchiere campaniforme e l'Italia nella preistoria europea del III millennio a.C.: 137–53. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Scarre, C.J. 2001. Modeling prehistoric populations: the case of Neolithic Brittany. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 285–313.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 1976. Bell Beakers and their context in central Europe, in Lanting, J.N. & D, J.. van der Waals (eds) Glockenbecher Symposion. Oberried 1974: 231–9. Haarlem: Fibula-Van Dishoeck.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 1993. Settlement and social change in central Europe, 3500-1500 BC. Journal of World Prehistory 7: 121–61.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 2000. Population, culture history, and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology 41: 811–35.Google Scholar
Turek, J. & Peška J, J.. 2001. Bell Beaker settlement pattern in Bohemia and Moravia, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the international colloquium Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) 11-16 May 1998: 411–28. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Vandkilde, H. 2001. Beaker representation in the Danish Late Neolithic, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today. Pottery, people, culture, symbols in prehistoric Europe. Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy), 11-16 May 1998: 333–60. Trento: Ufficio Beni Archeologici.Google Scholar
Vander Linden, M. 2006. Le phénomène campaniforme dans l'Europe du 3ème millénaire avant notre ère. Synthèse et nouvelles perspectives (British Archaeological Reports International Series 1470). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar