Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:05:51.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transformations in ritual practice and social interaction on the Tiwanaku periphery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2014

Juan Albarracin-Jordan
Affiliation:
1Fundación Bartolomé de las Casas, 18844 Park Grove Lane, Dallas, TX 75287, USA (Email: [email protected])
José M. Capriles
Affiliation:
2Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Antofagasta 1520, Casilla 6-D, Arica, Chile (Email: [email protected]) 3Centro de Investigaciones del Hombre en el Desierto (CIHDE), Av. General Velásquez 1775, Arica, Chile
Melanie J. Miller
Affiliation:
4Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, 232 Kroeber Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA (Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Ritual practices and their associated material paraphernalia played a key role in extending the reach and ideological impact of early states. The discovery of a leather bag containing snuffing tablets and traces of psychoactive substances at Cueva del Chileno in the southern Andes testifies to the adoption of Tiwanaku practices by emergent local elites. Tiwanaku control spread over the whole of the south-central Andes during the Middle Horizon (AD 500–1100) but by the end of the period it had begun to fragment into a series of smaller polities. The bag had been buried by an emergent local elite who chose at this time to relinquish the former Tiwanaku ritual practices that its contents represent.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agüero, P.C. 2007. Los textiles de Pulacayo y las relaciones entre Tiwanaku y San Pedro de Atacama. Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino 12: 8598.Google Scholar
Albarracin-Jordan, J. 1999. The archaeology of Tiwanaku: the myths, history, and science of an ancient Andean civilization. La Paz: Fundación Bartolomé de las Casas.Google Scholar
Albarracin-Jordan, J. 2007. La formación del estado prehisp´anico en los Andes: origen y desarrollo de la sociedad segmentaria indígena. La Paz: Fundación Bartolomé de las Casas.Google Scholar
Albarracin-Jordan, J. & Capriles, J.M.. 2011. The Paleoamerican occupation of Cueva Bautista: Late Pleistocene human evidence from the Bolivian highlands. Current Research in the Pleistocene 28: 9598.Google Scholar
Angelo, D. & Capriles, J.M.. 2004. La importancia de las plantas psicotrópicas para la economía de intercambio y relaciones de interacción en el altiplano sur andino. Chungar´a, Revista Chilena de Antropología 36: 1023–35.Google Scholar
Arellano López, J. 2000. Arqueología de Lipes. Altiplano sur de Bolivia. Quito: Museo Jacinto Jijón y Caamaño.Google Scholar
Barfield, L. 1961. Recent discoveries in the Atacama Desert and the Bolivian altiplano. American Antiquity 27: 93100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/278237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenguer, R.J. 1998. La iconografía del poder en Tiwanaku y su rol en la integración de zonas de frontera. Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino 7: 1937.Google Scholar
Berenguer, R.J. 2000. Tiwanaku: señores del lago sagrado. Santiago: Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino.Google Scholar
Berenguer, R.J. 2004. Caravanas, interacción y cambio en el desierto de Atacama. Santiago: Sirawi.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. & Lee, S.. 2013. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55: 720–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, D.L. 1997. Political institutional factors contributing to the integration of the Tiwanaku state, in Manzanilla, L. (ed.) Emergence and change in early urban societies: 229–43. New York: Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1848-2_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capriles, J.M. 2002. Intercambio y uso ritual de fauna por Tiwanaku: an´alisis de pelos y fibras de los conjuntos arqueológicos de Amaguaya, Bolivia. Estudios Atacameños 23: 3351.Google Scholar
Capriles, J.M. & Albarracin-Jordan, J.. 2013. The earliest human occupations in Bolivia: a review of the archaeological evidence. Quaternary International 301: 4659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2012.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, P.J. 2009. Tumbas, metalurgia y complejidad social en un p´aramo del altiplano surandino: Pulacayo, Bolivia, primer milenio d.C. Revista Andina 49: 71103.Google Scholar
De La Vega, E., Frye, K.L. & Tung, T.. 2005. The cave burial from Molino-Chilacachi, in Stanish, C., Cohen, A.B. & Aldenderfer, M.S. (ed.) Advances in Titicaca Basin archaeology: 185–95. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.10.2307/j.ctvhhhfn9.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliade, M. 1964. Shamanism: archaic technique of ecstasy. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Glowacki, M. 2005. Food of the gods or mere mortals? Hallucinogenic Spondylus and its interpretive implications for early Andean society. Antiquity 79: 257–68.10.1017/S0003598X00114061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harner, M.J. 1973. Hallucinogens and shamanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hastorf, C.A. 2008. The Formative period in the Titicaca Basin, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H. (ed.) Handbook of South American archaeology: 545–61. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74907-5_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A.G., Hua, Q., Blackwell, P.G., Niu, M., Buck, C.E., Guilderson, T.P., Heaton, T.J., Palmer, J.G., Reimer, P.J., Reimer, R.W., Turney, C.S.M. & Zimmerman, S.R.H.. 2013. SHCal13 southern hemisphere calibration, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55: 1889–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janusek, J.W. 2008. Ancient Tiwanaku. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. 2006. Core, peripheries, and regional realities in Middle Horizon Peru. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25: 346–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolata, A.L. 2003. Tiwanaku ceremonial architecture and urban planning, in Kolata, A.L. (ed.) Tiwanaku and its hinterland: archaeology and paleoecology of an Andean civilization: 175201. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Llagostera, A. 2006. Contextualización e iconografía de las tabletas psicotrópicas Tiwanaku de San Pedro de Atacama. Chungar´a, Revista Chilena de Antropología 38: 83111.Google Scholar
Loza, C.B. 2007. El atado de remedios de un religioso/médico del periodo Tiwanaku: miradas cruzadas y conexiones actuales. Bulletin de l’Institut Franc¸ais d’Études Andines 36: 317–42.10.4000/bifea.3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, J.L. 2011. Gente de la tierra de guerra: Los Lipes en las tradiciones andinas y el imaginario colonial. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Per´u.Google Scholar
Métraux, A. 1936. Les Indiens Uro-Cipaya de Carangas. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 28: 155208. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/jsa.1936.1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.J., Capriles, J.M., Albarracin-Jordan, J. & Moore, C.. 2013. Investigating prehistoric hallucinogen consumption: an archaeological case study from Lípez, Bolivia. Paper presented at the Society of Hair Testing International Meeting, Geneva, 2830 August 2013.Google Scholar
Morales, M.S., Nielsen, A.E. & Villalba, R.. 2013. First dendroarchaeological dates of prehistoric contexts in South America: chullpas in the Central Andes. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 2393–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narby, J. & Huxley, F. (ed.). 2001. Shamans through time: 500 years to the path of knowledge. New York: Tarcher & Penguin.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.E. 2006. Plazas para los antepasados: descentralización y poder corporativo en las formaciones políticas preincaicas de los Andes circumpuneños. Estudios Atacameños 31: 6389.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.E. 2008. The materiality of ancestors: chullpas and social memory in the Late Prehispanic history of the south Andes, in Mills, B.J. & Walker, W.H. (ed.) Memory work: archaeologies of material practices: 207–32. Santa Fe (NM): School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.E. 2009. Ancestors at war: meaningful conflict and social processes in the south Andes, in Nielsen, A.E. & Walker, W.H. (ed.) Warfare in cultural context: practice, agency, and the archaeology of violence: 218–43. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A.E. & Barberi, E.E.´an. 2008. El Señorío Mallku revisitado. Aportes al conocimiento de la historia prehisp´anica tardía de Lípez, in Casanovas, C. Rivera (ed.) Arqueología de las tierras altas, valles interandinos y tierras bajas de Bolivia: 145–66. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Programa de Investigación Estratégica en Bolivia.Google Scholar
Núñez, L. & Dillehay, T.D.. 1995. Movilidad giratoria, armonía social y desarrollo en los Andes meridionales: patrones de tr´afico e interacción económica (ensayo). Antofagasta: Universidad Católica del Norte.Google Scholar
Posnansky, A. 1945. Tihuanacu, the cradle of American man. Volumes 1–2. New York: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Stanish, C. 2003. Ancient Titicaca: the evolution of complex society in southern Peru and northern Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520232457.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, C.M. 1987. The iconography of South American snuff trays and related paraphernalia. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Ethnographic Museum.Google Scholar
Torres, C.M. 1998. Psychoactive substances in the archaeology of northern Chile and NW Argentina. A comparative review of the evidence. Chungar´a, Revista Chilena de Antropología 30: 4963.Google Scholar
Torres, C.M. & Repke, D.B.. 2006. Anadenanthera: visionary plant of ancient South America. New York: Haworth Herbal.Google Scholar
Wassén, S.H. 1972. A medicine-man’s implements and plants in a Tiahuanacoid tomb in highland Bolivia. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Ethnographic Museum.Google Scholar
Zonisig, . 2000. Zonificación agroecológica y socioeconómica del departamento de Potosí. Potosí: Prefectura del Departamento de Potosí, Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Planificación.Google Scholar